F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Small cosmetic purchases through digital platforms

Small cosmetic purchases through digital platforms

Small cosmetic purchases through digital platforms

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
claw1994
Junior Member
18
12-30-2023, 01:28 AM
#1
I just wanted to start a discussion about cosmetic micro-transactions in 2018. It popped into my mind because of the new Overwatch skins. I think micro-transactions are okay as long as they don’t impact gameplay. I like cosmetic ones because buying them helps developers earn while giving players something new—like CSGO skins or LoL skins.
C
claw1994
12-30-2023, 01:28 AM #1

I just wanted to start a discussion about cosmetic micro-transactions in 2018. It popped into my mind because of the new Overwatch skins. I think micro-transactions are okay as long as they don’t impact gameplay. I like cosmetic ones because buying them helps developers earn while giving players something new—like CSGO skins or LoL skins.

H
Hyper_B0Y
Member
215
12-30-2023, 03:26 AM
#2
Most people agree they’re okay as long as the changes are just cosmetic and not meant to give an unfair advantage. I haven’t noticed anyone holding a contrasting opinion; it looks like certain businesses have other ideas.
H
Hyper_B0Y
12-30-2023, 03:26 AM #2

Most people agree they’re okay as long as the changes are just cosmetic and not meant to give an unfair advantage. I haven’t noticed anyone holding a contrasting opinion; it looks like certain businesses have other ideas.

B
Bruno2910
Member
138
12-31-2023, 03:56 PM
#3
Some might think that after paying for a game, every feature should be bundled in, including skins and more.
B
Bruno2910
12-31-2023, 03:56 PM #3

Some might think that after paying for a game, every feature should be bundled in, including skins and more.

B
brayden07890
Member
59
01-01-2024, 01:48 AM
#4
This situation mirrors the company’s request for funds to create new material. I don’t really empathize much with consumers given that $60 has been the typical price point for AAA titles for about a decade, surpassing the older $40 standard around 1995. Plus, many people wait for discounts anyway. From a consumer perspective, it’s hard to grasp the complexities of software development. As someone who works in this field, I tend to view what consumers demand as being taken for granted. Day one updates—whether patches or DLC—would face less backlash if people were more aware of how software evolves and manages its lifecycle.
B
brayden07890
01-01-2024, 01:48 AM #4

This situation mirrors the company’s request for funds to create new material. I don’t really empathize much with consumers given that $60 has been the typical price point for AAA titles for about a decade, surpassing the older $40 standard around 1995. Plus, many people wait for discounts anyway. From a consumer perspective, it’s hard to grasp the complexities of software development. As someone who works in this field, I tend to view what consumers demand as being taken for granted. Day one updates—whether patches or DLC—would face less backlash if people were more aware of how software evolves and manages its lifecycle.

B
BruinsBear40
Junior Member
12
01-08-2024, 08:25 AM
#5
I’m comfortable with skins and similar features. They allow for more growth and help fund the game. While some titles misuse them or fail to invest in improvements, this isn’t the case here.
B
BruinsBear40
01-08-2024, 08:25 AM #5

I’m comfortable with skins and similar features. They allow for more growth and help fund the game. While some titles misuse them or fail to invest in improvements, this isn’t the case here.

_
_Sawe_
Junior Member
44
01-08-2024, 09:39 AM
#6
I'm in the same situation too. Often the skins need time to grow, and the cost of getting them is meant to cover development before earning a modest profit afterward.
_
_Sawe_
01-08-2024, 09:39 AM #6

I'm in the same situation too. Often the skins need time to grow, and the cost of getting them is meant to cover development before earning a modest profit afterward.

B
113
01-08-2024, 11:25 AM
#7
I agree, but only if it's not a loot box situation. Adding random elements seems like the developers are trying to encourage players to spend their money.
B
BasiComplexity
01-08-2024, 11:25 AM #7

I agree, but only if it's not a loot box situation. Adding random elements seems like the developers are trying to encourage players to spend their money.

M
MeskaDvasia
Member
50
01-08-2024, 10:03 PM
#8
It's clear you prefer predictability. If I need something, I want to know exactly what I'm getting.
M
MeskaDvasia
01-08-2024, 10:03 PM #8

It's clear you prefer predictability. If I need something, I want to know exactly what I'm getting.

S
sidyfan
Member
151
01-08-2024, 11:14 PM
#9
It's interesting how many people struggle with that. My view is, I don’t mind if developers charge exorbitant amounts for features that don’t impact gameplay.
S
sidyfan
01-08-2024, 11:14 PM #9

It's interesting how many people struggle with that. My view is, I don’t mind if developers charge exorbitant amounts for features that don’t impact gameplay.

T
163
01-08-2024, 11:23 PM
#10
Cosmetics MTX work well for me, but I think all in-game items should come from grinding. Loot boxes should be removed unless they’re mission rewards or special bonuses beyond the regular ones.
T
Tutterbutter88
01-08-2024, 11:23 PM #10

Cosmetics MTX work well for me, but I think all in-game items should come from grinding. Loot boxes should be removed unless they’re mission rewards or special bonuses beyond the regular ones.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next