No, the ASRock B450M HDV is not compatible with an R5 2600/2600x.

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop No, the ASRock B450M HDV is not compatible with an R5 2600/2600x.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next

3Edge
Senior Member

718

06-02-2019, 12:35 AM

Hey there, I’m weighing my options between the R5 2600 and 2600x. Since my motherboard is quite basic, I’m worried about compatibility. My current setup includes an R5 2400g, 8 GB of 3200 MHz RAM, an RX 5700 graphics card, and a 500W EVGA PSU. I’m not sure if these specs would work smoothly together. Let me know what you think!

3Edge

06-02-2019, 12:35 AM #1

Nero12321
Posting Freak

858

06-21-2019, 07:58 PM

Are you asking about the HDV version of the ASROC B450M or the HDV R4.0 model?

Nero12321

06-21-2019, 07:58 PM #2

Are you asking about the HDV version of the ASROC B450M or the HDV R4.0 model?

DevilDonalt
Junior Member

06-21-2019, 08:27 PM

It seems like you're referring to a high-definition video. Could you clarify what you mean by "just the hdv"?

DevilDonalt

06-21-2019, 08:27 PM #3

It seems like you're referring to a high-definition video. Could you clarify what you mean by "just the hdv"?

7bebe_Hasson
Member

06-29-2019, 01:57 PM

For HDV it should function properly. With R4.0 it may face issues, so verify first before proceeding.

7bebe_Hasson

06-29-2019, 01:57 PM #4

For HDV it should function properly. With R4.0 it may face issues, so verify first before proceeding.

husker53
Posting Freak

802

06-29-2019, 06:46 PM

You're checking for variations on the ASRock B450M HDV P1.10 model. It seems the differences you're seeing might be minimal or based on specific configurations.

husker53

06-29-2019, 06:46 PM #5

You're checking for variations on the ASRock B450M HDV P1.10 model. It seems the differences you're seeing might be minimal or based on specific configurations.

iTestify
Member

06-30-2019, 10:08 AM

I think the 2600 (non-x) model works well because it's a 65W device, while the 2600x is a 95W unit. I’d pick the 2600 and run it; your board should handle it without issues.

iTestify

06-30-2019, 10:08 AM #6

I think the 2600 (non-x) model works well because it's a 65W device, while the 2600x is a 95W unit. I’d pick the 2600 and run it; your board should handle it without issues.

blackdragon172
Junior Member

07-01-2019, 10:27 AM

The board fits perfectly with 100% compatibility and is ideal for running the chip.

blackdragon172

07-01-2019, 10:27 AM #7

The board fits perfectly with 100% compatibility and is ideal for running the chip.

Erls
Junior Member

07-03-2019, 06:45 AM

the dp on the chip (65vs95) isn't significant. it simply indicates you have a 65w rated cooler versus a 95w rated one. actually, during overclocking, both the 2600 and 2600x models perform similarly and consume around 110w maximum.

Erls

07-03-2019, 06:45 AM #8

iTzSantiiArg
Member

07-09-2019, 02:17 PM

Sadly I can't find the original case, but all clues (UEFI and labels on the motherboard) suggest it's not a 4.0 model. This photo was taken roughly a year ago during the build process

iTzSantiiArg

07-09-2019, 02:17 PM #9

Sadly I can't find the original case, but all clues (UEFI and labels on the motherboard) suggest it's not a 4.0 model. This photo was taken roughly a year ago during the build process

Gh0sTrider17
Member

07-10-2019, 07:11 PM

#10

The rated power consumption of the component is listed for standard conditions. Remember this is the original spec, not an overclocked version. If your statement is accurate, devices like the AM3+ FX-9590 wouldn't have a wattage rating at all because they weren't designed with a cooling solution from the start. However, the 2600 model remains safe to use.

Gh0sTrider17

07-10-2019, 07:11 PM #10

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next