F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming No, it likely won<|pad|> a NVidia GTX 460 768MB wouldn't be enough for Star Wars Battlefront.

No, it likely won<|pad|> a NVidia GTX 460 768MB wouldn't be enough for Star Wars Battlefront.

No, it likely won<|pad|> a NVidia GTX 460 768MB wouldn't be enough for Star Wars Battlefront.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
R
RexCraft_YT
Junior Member
15
08-21-2016, 05:00 AM
#21
If you prefer a smooth 30 fps at about 720p, go for it. I thought 60 fps would look better overall.
R
RexCraft_YT
08-21-2016, 05:00 AM #21

If you prefer a smooth 30 fps at about 720p, go for it. I thought 60 fps would look better overall.

F
Fireking124
Senior Member
576
08-21-2016, 02:30 PM
#22
I completely understand your point, but he has a 1600x900 screen and is achieving performance comparable to mine. In the beta of Battlefront, I was consistently reaching up to 70fps.
F
Fireking124
08-21-2016, 02:30 PM #22

I completely understand your point, but he has a 1600x900 screen and is achieving performance comparable to mine. In the beta of Battlefront, I was consistently reaching up to 70fps.

P
pspsmith1998
Member
71
08-21-2016, 10:57 PM
#23
You seem to have a much stronger GPU than expected, your own configuration is far below 900p on ultra settings, or you're just looking up at the sky. Regardless, the performance will likely feel closer to 30 at that resolution, maybe even lower. For Battlefront specifically, I couldn't tolerate 30 fps when competing online. I hope your brother can handle it too.
P
pspsmith1998
08-21-2016, 10:57 PM #23

You seem to have a much stronger GPU than expected, your own configuration is far below 900p on ultra settings, or you're just looking up at the sky. Regardless, the performance will likely feel closer to 30 at that resolution, maybe even lower. For Battlefront specifically, I couldn't tolerate 30 fps when competing online. I hope your brother can handle it too.

K
ketman34
Posting Freak
834
08-23-2016, 10:49 PM
#24
The 460 SE was consistently a slow card, even at launch, and can't compete with the newer 1GB full-fat 460 or the 560Ti in second-hand deals.
K
ketman34
08-23-2016, 10:49 PM #24

The 460 SE was consistently a slow card, even at launch, and can't compete with the newer 1GB full-fat 460 or the 560Ti in second-hand deals.

F
FrenchTost
Member
204
09-08-2016, 04:32 PM
#25
I mentioned I can reach up to 70fps occasionally. That wasn't meant to describe the typical performance. My usual speed was around 35 to 50fps.
F
FrenchTost
09-08-2016, 04:32 PM #25

I mentioned I can reach up to 70fps occasionally. That wasn't meant to describe the typical performance. My usual speed was around 35 to 50fps.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3