F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Bf1 build configuration

Bf1 build configuration

Bf1 build configuration

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
A
AlfaZGamer
Junior Member
20
03-18-2016, 05:44 PM
#1
Right now I’m running an i5 4690k with 8 GB RAM. Next year I aim to upgrade to Skylake, adding 16 GB DDR4 and an i7 6700K. I also have a GTX 1070 paired with a 144 Hz 1080p display. I’m not too concerned about frame rates as long as the game runs smoothly without stutters or lag. Do you know anyone who plays this setup? Just want to confirm if the performance will be solid and stable. I understand you can check videos and benchmarks, but from what I’ve seen, noticeable stuttering usually happens only when CPU usage climbs past 70%.
A
AlfaZGamer
03-18-2016, 05:44 PM #1

Right now I’m running an i5 4690k with 8 GB RAM. Next year I aim to upgrade to Skylake, adding 16 GB DDR4 and an i7 6700K. I also have a GTX 1070 paired with a 144 Hz 1080p display. I’m not too concerned about frame rates as long as the game runs smoothly without stutters or lag. Do you know anyone who plays this setup? Just want to confirm if the performance will be solid and stable. I understand you can check videos and benchmarks, but from what I’ve seen, noticeable stuttering usually happens only when CPU usage climbs past 70%.

S
Superninja34
Member
225
03-19-2016, 01:49 AM
#2
Pick up a 4790k and 16GB RAM. My setup works with a 6600k and a 970.
S
Superninja34
03-19-2016, 01:49 AM #2

Pick up a 4790k and 16GB RAM. My setup works with a 6600k and a 970.

A
alejandro351
Member
137
03-19-2016, 07:05 AM
#3
I prefer purchasing the new architecture now because the 4790k is an older model, yet initial looks of Kaby Lake don’t suggest major upgrades. Additionally, I think your system feels more stable overall. Right now, I’m experiencing severe performance drops in certain games due to my home’s speed outpacing my CPU capabilities—especially with Witcher 3 and Battlefield 4 becoming nearly unplayable, no matter how much DSR I enable.
A
alejandro351
03-19-2016, 07:05 AM #3

I prefer purchasing the new architecture now because the 4790k is an older model, yet initial looks of Kaby Lake don’t suggest major upgrades. Additionally, I think your system feels more stable overall. Right now, I’m experiencing severe performance drops in certain games due to my home’s speed outpacing my CPU capabilities—especially with Witcher 3 and Battlefield 4 becoming nearly unplayable, no matter how much DSR I enable.

M
Matke04
Posting Freak
825
04-09-2016, 09:51 AM
#4
The variation between Haswell Refresh and Kaby Lake is around 10%, quite a small difference.
M
Matke04
04-09-2016, 09:51 AM #4

The variation between Haswell Refresh and Kaby Lake is around 10%, quite a small difference.

T
TamedWolfy
Member
156
04-10-2016, 07:38 PM
#5
I’m heading to 4790k using the same setup you mentioned, with a 390GB drive and 16GB of RAM installed.
T
TamedWolfy
04-10-2016, 07:38 PM #5

I’m heading to 4790k using the same setup you mentioned, with a 390GB drive and 16GB of RAM installed.

B
BanaanBerry
Senior Member
253
05-02-2016, 07:13 AM
#6
However, Z97's design is outdated from a technical standpoint—it's not just about speed improvements. It offers more PCIe lanes, USB 3.1 support, and DDR4 memory. If I were purchasing an entire system, I'd choose the X99 instead.
B
BanaanBerry
05-02-2016, 07:13 AM #6

However, Z97's design is outdated from a technical standpoint—it's not just about speed improvements. It offers more PCIe lanes, USB 3.1 support, and DDR4 memory. If I were purchasing an entire system, I'd choose the X99 instead.

X
Xephtor
Member
192
05-02-2016, 02:45 PM
#7
It remains the same quantity of PCIe, DDR4 offers little improvement over DDR3 and USB 3.1, so you can always find a PCIe card to use.
X
Xephtor
05-02-2016, 02:45 PM #7

It remains the same quantity of PCIe, DDR4 offers little improvement over DDR3 and USB 3.1, so you can always find a PCIe card to use.

Y
yalo29
Senior Member
641
05-23-2016, 05:15 PM
#8
Only the Asrock Extreme 6 handles full-speed M.2 on the Z97 platform. My XP941 reaches about 890mb/sec, while it typically hits around 1100mb/s at top speed with a PCIe adapter card.
Y
yalo29
05-23-2016, 05:15 PM #8

Only the Asrock Extreme 6 handles full-speed M.2 on the Z97 platform. My XP941 reaches about 890mb/sec, while it typically hits around 1100mb/s at top speed with a PCIe adapter card.

F
FuzzyMug
Senior Member
476
05-23-2016, 10:10 PM
#9
Maintain identical performance from the CPU. The DMI isn't as quick either. Also, it's possible the adapter isn't the right one.
F
FuzzyMug
05-23-2016, 10:10 PM #9

Maintain identical performance from the CPU. The DMI isn't as quick either. Also, it's possible the adapter isn't the right one.

H
HBROS1245
Member
179
05-25-2016, 05:28 AM
#10
The adapter card gave me full performance while the native M.2 was capped at 890. My point remains the same—if Op decides to upgrade his processor, he should go for the latest tech. The only drawback is Kabylake will need a new socket again, but at least he could transfer the RAM then.
H
HBROS1245
05-25-2016, 05:28 AM #10

The adapter card gave me full performance while the native M.2 was capped at 890. My point remains the same—if Op decides to upgrade his processor, he should go for the latest tech. The only drawback is Kabylake will need a new socket again, but at least he could transfer the RAM then.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next