Yes, the Ryzen 5 3600 could create a performance issue with an RTX 3070.
Yes, the Ryzen 5 3600 could create a performance issue with an RTX 3070.
Sure, that sounds like a logical sequence for setting up your components.
Yes, it will, even when facing delays. Nothing is going to blow up, so that's reassuring. My 3600x feels a bit stuck with the 2060 Super, but it's still fine for now. Also, monitors can be pushed to higher speeds too.
In fact, I believe everyone should aim for this. Monitoring is the perfect bottleneck—you'll avoid any drops or tearing, and you can run at full settings. Set the volumetric lighting to its highest level too! This is exactly what I want. If I receive a 3070/3080/s super high resolution, I'll keep my current monitor and switch to a 1080p/60Hz one again for maximum performance—no interruptions. That would be a dream come true. Having a monitor that fully utilizes your hardware would be counterproductive unless you really enjoy custom frames (so no one else does). Also, remember that with powerful systems you can super sample, which is a great choice. It can eliminate jaggies and improve the visual quality. This is what I mean—if that's the case, you can definitely use NVIDIA super sampling (though many games might not support it at 60fps, but it's still an option).
Focus entirely on the software or game you're using and the outcomes you expect. It doesn't matter much. A 3600 provides ample performance for most systems, avoiding bottlenecks with a 2080 Ti or even a 3090 in most titles. Why exaggerate the role of CPU in games? CPU plays only a minor part for gaming. Gameplay at 1080p, medium or high settings with a 3600 is sufficient.
If you check the lowest possible frames per second and maintain stock CPU settings, overclock a 2080 Ti while keeping the CPU idle, and play at medium quality, you could potentially gain around 15% more FPS by investing in a more expensive processor. However, once you raise the resolution or quality to high levels or shift your focus from minimum to average FPS, the gains become negligible.
Even in the examples provided, the numbers represent extreme cases for the 3600. Upgrading to a better CPU only makes a noticeable difference if you're also increasing resolution or quality. Gaming isn't heavily CPU-dependent. You don’t require a powerful CPU to play games. A modest CPU can run high-end GPUs smoothly without issues. In a few still-relevant titles like CS:GO, CPU often matters more than the graphics card, but even then a 3600 is more than sufficient. If you're handling CPU-intensive work outside of gaming, a pricier CPU might be justified, but for regular gaming, a 3600 is more than adequate no matter your GPU.
Thanks for sharing your perspective on the topic. It's clear you value a balanced setup. Ideally, you want to avoid any bottlenecks, but it's more about having enough power for your needs. With an older i5-1060 and a 1080 GTX, you're already in a solid range. Most games run smoothly at higher frame rates, so worrying about bottlenecks isn't always necessary. Sometimes people upgrade their CPUs and then find themselves with limited performance in games, while others focus on graphics. It's wise to prioritize what matters most for your experience. If you're comfortable with a mid-range GPU and a capable CPU, you're in a good position. Just keep an eye on your performance and adjust as needed.