Yes, I would consider 2920x.

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Yes, I would consider 2920x.

Yes, I would consider 2920x.

Yes, I would consider 2920x.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3

C

Creeperman3
Senior Member

454

03-08-2019, 04:17 PM

#21

I need to explain this clearly. 2000WX CPUs are recognized for unpredictable performance across various software because of their mixed core structure—some cores have direct memory access while others don't. Programs that perform well with this setup (like rendering) benefit greatly, offering impressive speed potential (e.g., 24-core capability in some configurations). However, other tasks (such as data compression) struggle and often lag behind even faster CPUs like 2920x or 2950x. Therefore, assigning a single rating to 2000WX CPUs is misleading. It’s not practical to give one general score for such a diverse platform.

C

Creeperman3

03-08-2019, 04:17 PM #21

I need to explain this clearly. 2000WX CPUs are recognized for unpredictable performance across various software because of their mixed core structure—some cores have direct memory access while others don't. Programs that perform well with this setup (like rendering) benefit greatly, offering impressive speed potential (e.g., 24-core capability in some configurations). However, other tasks (such as data compression) struggle and often lag behind even faster CPUs like 2920x or 2950x. Therefore, assigning a single rating to 2000WX CPUs is misleading. It’s not practical to give one general score for such a diverse platform.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3