F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming What is the actual required frame rate, isn't 60 sufficient?

What is the actual required frame rate, isn't 60 sufficient?

What is the actual required frame rate, isn't 60 sufficient?

A
alejandrobo1
Posting Freak
877
12-14-2018, 05:24 AM
#1
It struck me recently (or perhaps it happened before, but I just kept going) that my quest for a more powerful GPU is becoming increasingly urgent. Do I truly need something capable of delivering around 120 fps at 1920p? That’s the resolution I use for my games. There’s no clear need to upgrade beyond a 27-inch screen in Full HD.

I’m accustomed to playing at 25 fps, and the TV maintains a smooth frame rate for the human eye. Aiming for 50 fps would be ideal for buttery smoothness. At the moment, a RX 6500 seems sufficient to achieve that—especially with current games, moderate settings for several more years, and I doubt ray tracing will be worth it.

I also prefer quiet, energy-efficient systems. A 65W 5600G paired with a dedicated ~70W GPU should meet my needs, providing stable 50 fps performance for the foreseeable future.
A
alejandrobo1
12-14-2018, 05:24 AM #1

It struck me recently (or perhaps it happened before, but I just kept going) that my quest for a more powerful GPU is becoming increasingly urgent. Do I truly need something capable of delivering around 120 fps at 1920p? That’s the resolution I use for my games. There’s no clear need to upgrade beyond a 27-inch screen in Full HD.

I’m accustomed to playing at 25 fps, and the TV maintains a smooth frame rate for the human eye. Aiming for 50 fps would be ideal for buttery smoothness. At the moment, a RX 6500 seems sufficient to achieve that—especially with current games, moderate settings for several more years, and I doubt ray tracing will be worth it.

I also prefer quiet, energy-efficient systems. A 65W 5600G paired with a dedicated ~70W GPU should meet my needs, providing stable 50 fps performance for the foreseeable future.

K
kungfutyla
Posting Freak
780
12-15-2018, 12:54 AM
#2
if the 50fps are smooth for you, nothing is against it
but frame rate and lowest fps during gaming also matter for GPUs. It might cause stuttering if it can't maintain 50fps consistently, though it's a personal preference.
cinema at 25fps and gaming at 25fps can feel quite different
this might help clarify things, but ultimately it's your own opinion. If 50 is acceptable, then it's okay.
others wouldn't even think about "just" gaming at 120 or 200fps.
frames per second (FPS) in TV, cinema, and gaming
frame rate decides if movies, videos, or games run smoothly. Discover the ideal minimum FPS for gaming and how many frames per second are best.
K
kungfutyla
12-15-2018, 12:54 AM #2

if the 50fps are smooth for you, nothing is against it
but frame rate and lowest fps during gaming also matter for GPUs. It might cause stuttering if it can't maintain 50fps consistently, though it's a personal preference.
cinema at 25fps and gaming at 25fps can feel quite different
this might help clarify things, but ultimately it's your own opinion. If 50 is acceptable, then it's okay.
others wouldn't even think about "just" gaming at 120 or 200fps.
frames per second (FPS) in TV, cinema, and gaming
frame rate decides if movies, videos, or games run smoothly. Discover the ideal minimum FPS for gaming and how many frames per second are best.

E
EldarHuahwi
Member
55
12-22-2018, 10:30 PM
#3
The article covered some useful insights, such as the difference between FPS and game type, which I was already familiar with. It seems the layout is clear and well-organized. Having a GPU that runs at 50 FPS without stutter should suffice for someone like me. I believe it's feasible to restrict FPS in card settings to manage power consumption, and this feature is available for AMD cards as well.
E
EldarHuahwi
12-22-2018, 10:30 PM #3

The article covered some useful insights, such as the difference between FPS and game type, which I was already familiar with. It seems the layout is clear and well-organized. Having a GPU that runs at 50 FPS without stutter should suffice for someone like me. I believe it's feasible to restrict FPS in card settings to manage power consumption, and this feature is available for AMD cards as well.

X
xEchoz
Member
208
12-23-2018, 03:39 AM
#4
you can adjust voltage, impose power caps, or restrict FPS
for example using the amd driver, msi afterburner, or similar tools
certain games provide an in-game FPS limit option
X
xEchoz
12-23-2018, 03:39 AM #4

you can adjust voltage, impose power caps, or restrict FPS
for example using the amd driver, msi afterburner, or similar tools
certain games provide an in-game FPS limit option

M
mcDavoz
Senior Member
544
12-24-2018, 04:37 PM
#5
Others can be quite sensitive to lower frame rates. For me, low frame rates lead to motion sickness. I’m not affected by movies, but I’d like to experience strong motion while playing anything below 40 frames. The screen refresh rate and hertz also contribute to this. If you don’t have any problems playing at 30 frames and it looks satisfactory, that’s fine.
M
mcDavoz
12-24-2018, 04:37 PM #5

Others can be quite sensitive to lower frame rates. For me, low frame rates lead to motion sickness. I’m not affected by movies, but I’d like to experience strong motion while playing anything below 40 frames. The screen refresh rate and hertz also contribute to this. If you don’t have any problems playing at 30 frames and it looks satisfactory, that’s fine.

M
Matke04
Posting Freak
825
12-24-2018, 05:38 PM
#6
Gaming depends on how you view it. Enjoying it is possible with whatever is provided. High frame rates and visual quality aren't always essential.
M
Matke04
12-24-2018, 05:38 PM #6

Gaming depends on how you view it. Enjoying it is possible with whatever is provided. High frame rates and visual quality aren't always essential.