F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking using XMP with 6700k question

using XMP with 6700k question

using XMP with 6700k question

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
S
Some_Dunkus
Member
190
11-09-2016, 06:27 AM
#11
it's okay if my system stays active at 4.2ghz and there isn't a proper idle speed, temps are under control.
S
Some_Dunkus
11-09-2016, 06:27 AM #11

it's okay if my system stays active at 4.2ghz and there isn't a proper idle speed, temps are under control.

J
JYSG
Member
171
11-11-2016, 01:58 AM
#12
the clock speed remains consistently at 4.2 on my 6700k, and the voltage fluctuates between about 0.792 and 1.25-1.26 volts depending on usage. it seems 4.2 requires more than 0.792 volts under load.
J
JYSG
11-11-2016, 01:58 AM #12

the clock speed remains consistently at 4.2 on my 6700k, and the voltage fluctuates between about 0.792 and 1.25-1.26 volts depending on usage. it seems 4.2 requires more than 0.792 volts under load.

T
tdowlingiii
Member
127
11-12-2016, 07:35 PM
#13
Intel markets these CPUs as unlocked, overclockable 'K' versions. Thus, they appear suitable for overclocking provided you maintain thermal limits with an effective cooler. CPU issues typically arise from overvoltage or thermal stress. The failure rate linked to heat is closely related to the gap between CPU temperature and ambient, along with the number of thermal cycles endured. Overvoltage or current-related failures also generate excessive heat beyond the component's rating, leading to silicon damage. My hypothesis is that we cannot directly observe or confirm what occurs at the transistor level during sustained high-frequency operation. One might expect current/voltage pulses to move through the silicon more rapidly, but this would likely accelerate wear—possibly shortening the chip’s lifespan. The exact duration before failure remains uncertain, even for experienced ASIC engineers. Nevertheless, I observe that these chips still function well, as evidenced by my continued use of a Sandy Bridge unit for several weeks. Many enthusiasts with overclocked builds suggest these components generally offer a longer service life. In summary, overclocking may slightly reduce transistor and silicon longevity, but as long as you stay within safe thermal and electrical limits, you can expect a respectable lifespan from your 6700k.
T
tdowlingiii
11-12-2016, 07:35 PM #13

Intel markets these CPUs as unlocked, overclockable 'K' versions. Thus, they appear suitable for overclocking provided you maintain thermal limits with an effective cooler. CPU issues typically arise from overvoltage or thermal stress. The failure rate linked to heat is closely related to the gap between CPU temperature and ambient, along with the number of thermal cycles endured. Overvoltage or current-related failures also generate excessive heat beyond the component's rating, leading to silicon damage. My hypothesis is that we cannot directly observe or confirm what occurs at the transistor level during sustained high-frequency operation. One might expect current/voltage pulses to move through the silicon more rapidly, but this would likely accelerate wear—possibly shortening the chip’s lifespan. The exact duration before failure remains uncertain, even for experienced ASIC engineers. Nevertheless, I observe that these chips still function well, as evidenced by my continued use of a Sandy Bridge unit for several weeks. Many enthusiasts with overclocked builds suggest these components generally offer a longer service life. In summary, overclocking may slightly reduce transistor and silicon longevity, but as long as you stay within safe thermal and electrical limits, you can expect a respectable lifespan from your 6700k.

B
blue_fanta
Member
143
11-12-2016, 10:09 PM
#14
the clock speed remains consistently at 4.2 on my 6700k, and the voltage fluctuates between around 0.792 volts when idle and rises to 1.25-1.26 during intensive tasks. wouldn't a stable 4.2 require more than 0.792 volts? that seems odd. i definitely think so. would intel speedstep not make any difference?
B
blue_fanta
11-12-2016, 10:09 PM #14

the clock speed remains consistently at 4.2 on my 6700k, and the voltage fluctuates between around 0.792 volts when idle and rises to 1.25-1.26 during intensive tasks. wouldn't a stable 4.2 require more than 0.792 volts? that seems odd. i definitely think so. would intel speedstep not make any difference?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2