Upgrading from 5800x3D to 9800x3D
Upgrading from 5800x3D to 9800x3D
Hello, I’ve been considering upgrading my PC for a while now. After the launch of the 9800x3D and seeing the results from tests, I’m even more unsure about making the change. The upgrade would require switching to an AM5 motherboard and new RAM, which is definitely an investment, though not too concerning for me. Looking ahead, I plan to replace my 3080Ti with a 5070 or 5080 model, but that won’t be until around summer 2025, not sooner. I’m mainly interested in Microsoft Flight Simulator, so I’ll upgrade my PC and get ready for MSFS24. Some people might suggest sticking with my current setup and 3080Ti, arguing it will work fine, but I’m not convinced. I usually want the best graphics settings, so I prefer higher resolutions. I’m currently at 1440p, but in MSFS settings I set the resolution to 150% (3840x2065), aiming for Ultra quality everywhere. My main concern is whether I should upgrade to the 9800x3D soon, or if my 3080Ti will follow. I’ve been a bit overwhelmed by stories about bottlenecks, and I’m trying to understand this theory better. I don’t want to wait too long to buy an RTX 50xx just for the CPU, so I’d rather focus on getting the processor first. If someone tells me the 9800x3D is compatible with my 3080Ti, I’d also like recommendations for a motherboard under 350€ (around 369$) that has two slots for M2 NVMe SSDs. Thanks in advance.
Hey there! If you're talking about MSFS, definitely go for it. That report looks solid. Even in 4K it should work fine. I've used MSI boards before—about twenty over the years. The "MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard" sounds like a strong pick. The Wi-Fi value adds up, especially with an external antenna. Three M2 slots at 300USD? That's a solid investment.
When considering a motherboard, you may discover that prices range from 150 to 200€ for AM5 options. This depends on your location and the balance between affordability and features. You might be able to rely on the second cheapest B650 chipset for now if you don’t have high demands. Otherwise, there are limited choices that could stretch further into the future, often just a bit more expensive—around 50€ or more.
Nevertheless, the B650 chipset provides sufficient capabilities for most scenarios. The X670E and X870 models benefit from PCIe 5.0 and M.2 Gen 5 connections, which far exceed today’s necessary bandwidth. These boards typically feature PCIe 5.0 slots numbering 16, while the latest high-end GPUs like the RTX 4090 operate over PCIe 4.0, and many 50-series cards also use that standard. Gen 5 M.2 drives are essentially unnecessary for most gamers, even those seeking maximum speed; they may slightly improve load times but won’t noticeably boost FPS compared to Gen 4. The MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI stands out as a solid choice, offering balanced features and robust VRM design for the 7950X. It includes two M.2 slots for NVMe drives, which some users find adequate. I’m unable to verify the exact TUF model, but it should support the 9800X3D and likely have at least two M.2 ports. Most manufacturers perform well on AM5, with variations in price and efficiency, and some models are more budget-friendly while still delivering solid performance.
The ASUS TUF Gaming B650-Plus WIFI seems similar to the MSI B650 Gaming Plus WIFI. A second AIO wouldn’t really help much for me. I’m confident my BeQuiet will last a long time, especially with this brand. Thanks for clarifying! I’m in France and the 9800x3D is just launched, already sold out on most sites. I still have time to decide. From what I understand, the stock discount will take some time, but I’m planning to buy it soon—hoping it works well with my 3080Ti and that it’s a good replacement.
a faster CPU is like a wide, open highway, while the GPU is the car that speeds along it as quickly as possible.
Checking msfs 24 suggests using powerful CPUs with high core counts. It’s better to wait for game reviews before deciding, since 8 cores may fall short against a 9950x.
Hello, The best settings shown for an AMD CPU in MSFS24 are the 7900x, offering 12 cores and 24 threads—four more cores than the 9800x3D but running at a lower frequency of 0.4 GHz. Its counterpart, the 7900x3D, has nearly identical specs yet costs €70 less. But should frequency be prioritized over core count? That question was similar for Prepar3D, even though it doesn’t match up directly...