F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Unusual AMD 3000 performance tweaks Behavior patterns during overclocking

Unusual AMD 3000 performance tweaks Behavior patterns during overclocking

Unusual AMD 3000 performance tweaks Behavior patterns during overclocking

R
Ryanmon
Member
200
11-19-2019, 11:50 PM
#1
For two years now, I've been using a Ryzen 5 3600 non x, Tuf X570-Pro board, GTX 1060 turbo, Vengeance 3200mhz 32gb(4x8), and RM750. I've been tweaking the settings from the start and have experienced some odd changes during my overclocking journey. Luckily, my CPU performed well, reaching 4.2ghz all cores at 1.31 volts, 4.375ghz at 2.325 volts, 2core 4.4ghz at 1.334 volts, and a single core up to 4.5ghz on Windows 10. I stopped pushing beyond 4.2ghz because some apps would crash even when the system was fine. Interestingly, on PopOS I managed 4.2ghz all cores at just 1.22 volts—stable and smooth, allowing me to run an 8k 3000 sample cycles without issues. Can anyone clarify this significant difference?
R
Ryanmon
11-19-2019, 11:50 PM #1

For two years now, I've been using a Ryzen 5 3600 non x, Tuf X570-Pro board, GTX 1060 turbo, Vengeance 3200mhz 32gb(4x8), and RM750. I've been tweaking the settings from the start and have experienced some odd changes during my overclocking journey. Luckily, my CPU performed well, reaching 4.2ghz all cores at 1.31 volts, 4.375ghz at 2.325 volts, 2core 4.4ghz at 1.334 volts, and a single core up to 4.5ghz on Windows 10. I stopped pushing beyond 4.2ghz because some apps would crash even when the system was fine. Interestingly, on PopOS I managed 4.2ghz all cores at just 1.22 volts—stable and smooth, allowing me to run an 8k 3000 sample cycles without issues. Can anyone clarify this significant difference?

I
iRees
Member
69
11-20-2019, 03:08 AM
#2
Don't assume stability equals real performance. Test it.
I
iRees
11-20-2019, 03:08 AM #2

Don't assume stability equals real performance. Test it.

S
Shibess
Member
129
12-08-2019, 11:32 PM
#3
You might face issues because the system won't boot when you attempt the Linux overclock in Windows. This could be due to compatibility problems or conflicting settings between the operating systems.
S
Shibess
12-08-2019, 11:32 PM #3

You might face issues because the system won't boot when you attempt the Linux overclock in Windows. This could be due to compatibility problems or conflicting settings between the operating systems.

M
Mr_Gloku
Member
211
12-10-2019, 03:53 PM
#4
PopOs is significantly less heavy than Windows. Windows has grown quite large, adding many extra features that complicate understanding its problems.
M
Mr_Gloku
12-10-2019, 03:53 PM #4

PopOs is significantly less heavy than Windows. Windows has grown quite large, adding many extra features that complicate understanding its problems.

T
TheblueTNT
Junior Member
12
12-12-2019, 10:46 PM
#5
I’m really not in the mood to test this, but I totally get that Windows tends to have more bloat. Thanks!
T
TheblueTNT
12-12-2019, 10:46 PM #5

I’m really not in the mood to test this, but I totally get that Windows tends to have more bloat. Thanks!