F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Unable to maintain stable performance with 3600Mhz RAM at 3466Mhz frequency – Crosshair VI Hero (WiFi ac)

Unable to maintain stable performance with 3600Mhz RAM at 3466Mhz frequency – Crosshair VI Hero (WiFi ac)

Unable to maintain stable performance with 3600Mhz RAM at 3466Mhz frequency – Crosshair VI Hero (WiFi ac)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
STEVEJasonson
Member
171
09-19-2019, 09:28 AM
#1
Hello everyone! I'm trying to push my machine's performance by overclocking and facing some RAM stability problems at lower clock speeds. I have a Ryzen 1700 with an OC of 3.9, using 3600 MHz DDR3 RAM. After looking into compatibility issues, I found others using 3466 MHz and decided to go with the lower setting for safety. I entered all the specs into my BIOS and ran Intel Burn Test—successful on standard runs, but freezing after 15-20 minutes at max speed. The CPU itself is stable when overclocked, so it's probably the RAM that's having trouble. Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
S
STEVEJasonson
09-19-2019, 09:28 AM #1

Hello everyone! I'm trying to push my machine's performance by overclocking and facing some RAM stability problems at lower clock speeds. I have a Ryzen 1700 with an OC of 3.9, using 3600 MHz DDR3 RAM. After looking into compatibility issues, I found others using 3466 MHz and decided to go with the lower setting for safety. I entered all the specs into my BIOS and ran Intel Burn Test—successful on standard runs, but freezing after 15-20 minutes at max speed. The CPU itself is stable when overclocked, so it's probably the RAM that's having trouble. Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.

I
ISY_0815
Senior Member
566
09-19-2019, 09:28 PM
#2
It's likely you require higher SOC voltage, which could harm your IMC on the CPU and/or raise DRAM voltage.
I
ISY_0815
09-19-2019, 09:28 PM #2

It's likely you require higher SOC voltage, which could harm your IMC on the CPU and/or raise DRAM voltage.

A
augustb19907
Senior Member
456
09-20-2019, 09:36 AM
#3
Existing SOC at 1.1 and DRAM at 1.42 – not sure if pushing further would improve safety or boost performance.
A
augustb19907
09-20-2019, 09:36 AM #3

Existing SOC at 1.1 and DRAM at 1.42 – not sure if pushing further would improve safety or boost performance.

E
EuropeanUnion
Senior Member
700
09-20-2019, 10:59 PM
#4
I’m not aware of anyone else relying on IBT for RAM testing. Many people prefer tools like TM5 or memtest64 instead. If IBT seems stuck, it might point to an issue beyond your RAM configuration.
E
EuropeanUnion
09-20-2019, 10:59 PM #4

I’m not aware of anyone else relying on IBT for RAM testing. Many people prefer tools like TM5 or memtest64 instead. If IBT seems stuck, it might point to an issue beyond your RAM configuration.

G
goldmoneyman
Member
52
09-21-2019, 12:12 AM
#5
To the best of my knowledge, IBT relies heavily on RAM, particularly during more demanding tests. I'm open to correction if I'm mistaken. My CPU overclock appears fine—it has passed all IBT assessments on its own, as well as extended sessions in Prime and OCCT (just to be cautious). It only fails once when adjusting the RAM settings. I plan to test one of those software tools to check for issues.
G
goldmoneyman
09-21-2019, 12:12 AM #5

To the best of my knowledge, IBT relies heavily on RAM, particularly during more demanding tests. I'm open to correction if I'm mistaken. My CPU overclock appears fine—it has passed all IBT assessments on its own, as well as extended sessions in Prime and OCCT (just to be cautious). It only fails once when adjusting the RAM settings. I plan to test one of those software tools to check for issues.

E
Evgenius
Junior Member
16
09-27-2019, 02:28 AM
#6
3600mhz places a heavy demand on first-generation Ryzen processors. Even at lower speeds like 3200mhz, achieving stable performance was challenging—only reaching about 3.8ghz on a 1700x stable board. At 3600mhz or even 3466, it seems the limits are being pushed further. The Ryzen 2 handles these frequencies better but still faces limitations; I often had to lower the clock to 2800mhz to hit around 4.2ghz across all cores on a 2700x. Consider upgrading to a higher socket if you can, but be mindful of stability at 1.2v. Keep RAM voltage at its rated level. If you must downclock, adjust timings and focus on reducing latency for your chosen speed—it does require some effort. A range from 2800mhz to 3200mhz seems reasonable depending on CPU quality, target clock, and workload. For gaming at 2800mhz, Ryzen performs better due to improved memory bandwidth and InfinityFabric speed. However, beyond a certain point, the gains in clock speed may not outweigh thermal or stability concerns. Stress tests like IBT are acceptable, but running OCCT large FFT or ASUS RealBench can give more accurate insights. These tools offer real-world results; you can load all RAM with 7zip to evaluate your system’s limits, and they cover memory and core performance at high frequencies. Smaller benchmarks mainly serve extreme thermal validation.
E
Evgenius
09-27-2019, 02:28 AM #6

3600mhz places a heavy demand on first-generation Ryzen processors. Even at lower speeds like 3200mhz, achieving stable performance was challenging—only reaching about 3.8ghz on a 1700x stable board. At 3600mhz or even 3466, it seems the limits are being pushed further. The Ryzen 2 handles these frequencies better but still faces limitations; I often had to lower the clock to 2800mhz to hit around 4.2ghz across all cores on a 2700x. Consider upgrading to a higher socket if you can, but be mindful of stability at 1.2v. Keep RAM voltage at its rated level. If you must downclock, adjust timings and focus on reducing latency for your chosen speed—it does require some effort. A range from 2800mhz to 3200mhz seems reasonable depending on CPU quality, target clock, and workload. For gaming at 2800mhz, Ryzen performs better due to improved memory bandwidth and InfinityFabric speed. However, beyond a certain point, the gains in clock speed may not outweigh thermal or stability concerns. Stress tests like IBT are acceptable, but running OCCT large FFT or ASUS RealBench can give more accurate insights. These tools offer real-world results; you can load all RAM with 7zip to evaluate your system’s limits, and they cover memory and core performance at high frequencies. Smaller benchmarks mainly serve extreme thermal validation.

M
Mel_Kawaii
Member
182
09-27-2019, 03:52 AM
#7
The SOC voltage is likely too low. For stable performance of your 4x8 3200mhz Flare X kit on Crosshair VI Hero (off Wi-Fi), set it to 1.175v with high LLC. You can safely run it up to 1.2v continuously.
M
Mel_Kawaii
09-27-2019, 03:52 AM #7

The SOC voltage is likely too low. For stable performance of your 4x8 3200mhz Flare X kit on Crosshair VI Hero (off Wi-Fi), set it to 1.175v with high LLC. You can safely run it up to 1.2v continuously.

L
lillboman91
Member
164
09-29-2019, 02:29 AM
#8
3466 is quite fortunate for a first-gen Ryzen, just reduce the clock speeds.
L
lillboman91
09-29-2019, 02:29 AM #8

3466 is quite fortunate for a first-gen Ryzen, just reduce the clock speeds.

K
KwongKwaiLa
Member
235
09-29-2019, 09:21 AM
#9
Thanks for the support! It seems like 3466 might not be the right number, so I'm starting with 3400. I'll test it out and adjust as needed.
K
KwongKwaiLa
09-29-2019, 09:21 AM #9

Thanks for the support! It seems like 3466 might not be the right number, so I'm starting with 3400. I'll test it out and adjust as needed.

L
LaserJamez
Junior Member
17
09-29-2019, 04:48 PM
#10
Hello everyone, here’s an update and some thoughts. Your RAM is now running at 3333Mhz while your CPU is at 3.9Ghz. You’ve got the CPU at 1.35 volts and RAM at 1.38, and you’ve cleared all benchmarks without issues—except for Prime95 which crashes after a few hours. You’re doing a blend test and thinking it might be the RAM, but your CPU is stable and temps are consistent. The 40 minutes of Battlefield 1 also passed fine. You’re considering a Memtest or raising the voltage to 1.4. It’s unclear if this is necessary, or if it could just be a false positive. Your RAM isn’t hitting its full speed yet, and your CPU overclock seems solid. No clear direction yet—keep monitoring and let me know what happens next.
L
LaserJamez
09-29-2019, 04:48 PM #10

Hello everyone, here’s an update and some thoughts. Your RAM is now running at 3333Mhz while your CPU is at 3.9Ghz. You’ve got the CPU at 1.35 volts and RAM at 1.38, and you’ve cleared all benchmarks without issues—except for Prime95 which crashes after a few hours. You’re doing a blend test and thinking it might be the RAM, but your CPU is stable and temps are consistent. The 40 minutes of Battlefield 1 also passed fine. You’re considering a Memtest or raising the voltage to 1.4. It’s unclear if this is necessary, or if it could just be a false positive. Your RAM isn’t hitting its full speed yet, and your CPU overclock seems solid. No clear direction yet—keep monitoring and let me know what happens next.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next