TPLINK OMADA setup with PFSense? 2 ISPs, single mesh design. Got any suggestions?
TPLINK OMADA setup with PFSense? 2 ISPs, single mesh design. Got any suggestions?
FYI, I've experienced some serious problems with sg1100 units. Treat them carefully. I own one for a family member's home, two friends use theirs, and I've seen it get corrupted by EMMC on one of them—randomly—and then again after an update. Another friend got it corrupted too after a second update. For NetGates, Taclane support is quick, but these kinds of failures are beyond what we should expect. I run PFSense in a virtual machine at my lab and haven't had any issues there. Those sg1100s? Better not touch them.
The top choice for you seems to be the Synology. While I appreciate Ubiquiti, my living space doesn’t allow rack-mounted gear, and the ER-X and USG aren’t available there. Also, shipping and taxes in India make those products expensive. The TP-Link VPN router option looks more affordable. With only a 300Mbps Wi-Fi connection, I’m sticking to what’s practical—no need for complicated imports or poor performance.
The deco M4 and E4 are both variants of the same rifle model, differing mainly in their caliber and intended use. The E4 is a full-size rifle with a 5.56x45mm round, while the deco M4 is a compact version designed for tactical situations.
The M3 is essentially a combination of the M3W and M4. Regarding the M3W, it may become outdated, but a Wi-Fi 6 version could offer a wall-mount option for devices without other choices.
That's just the router I own and I understand its features. I haven't tried Ubiquti or other alternatives. Remember, this isn't a common scenario for most people. You're stepping into premium consumer or business equipment now. Or you're building something yourself, which has its own challenges.
It’s good to hear. Understanding your situation is key. Not everyone can reach the same markets, so be clear about your constraints for better advice. Even if the Netgate 1100 has some problems, it doesn’t mean all pfSense products are poor quality—they’re just designed with a certain audience in mind. The main distinction lies in port speeds: the E4 uses fast Ethernet (10/100Mbps), while the M4 supports gigabit. Otherwise, WiFi capabilities appear similar. Companies that focus on affordable consumer devices like TP-Link will likely release updates soon, moving away from outdated versions. This doesn’t imply the older models are useless; they just stop getting new support. Most problems get resolved during a product’s life cycle, and if they remain, users often discuss solutions or post on forums. For business-grade gear, you rarely see such rapid obsolescence—businesses avoid products without long-term support. If you’re working with a limited budget and consumer hardware, don’t expect the same durability as enterprise options. Make the most of what you have and consider upgrading later if your funds allow.
It's clear the Decos cannot manage several WAN connections. If a TP-Link dual-WAN router fits your budget and is available, choose it.
Reviews on Amazon are mixed; I haven’t tried it myself, but I believe Omada is improving over time.