F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking To utilize the GPU R5 M330 to its full capacity, follow the recommended settings and configurations.

To utilize the GPU R5 M330 to its full capacity, follow the recommended settings and configurations.

To utilize the GPU R5 M330 to its full capacity, follow the recommended settings and configurations.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
U
ulstein06
Junior Member
32
03-05-2017, 08:00 PM
#1
Hi,
I'm using a laptop with the Radeon r5 m330 GPU. The default settings are core@1030mhz, memory clock@1000mhz, and DDR3 2GB RAM. I believe this isn't a high-end gaming card, but I'm trying to overclock it to achieve around 30-50 fps for flight simulation. I want to get the most out of it. The MSI Afterburner options available are power limit, core clock up to 1100mhz, and memory clock up to 1100mhz. I can't adjust the core voltage, fan control, or temperature limits.

Other details:
- AMD a8-7410 APU @2.2ghz
- 8GB DDR3 @1600 (2x4GB)

Please help me. Thanks.
U
ulstein06
03-05-2017, 08:00 PM #1

Hi,
I'm using a laptop with the Radeon r5 m330 GPU. The default settings are core@1030mhz, memory clock@1000mhz, and DDR3 2GB RAM. I believe this isn't a high-end gaming card, but I'm trying to overclock it to achieve around 30-50 fps for flight simulation. I want to get the most out of it. The MSI Afterburner options available are power limit, core clock up to 1100mhz, and memory clock up to 1100mhz. I can't adjust the core voltage, fan control, or temperature limits.

Other details:
- AMD a8-7410 APU @2.2ghz
- 8GB DDR3 @1600 (2x4GB)

Please help me. Thanks.

S
szymon124
Member
57
03-06-2017, 03:52 AM
#2
I've found Sapphire Trixx to perform better than Afterburner on my AMD graphics cards. If you're experiencing similar results, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds compared to Afterburner, even though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If this doesn't work, you might only be able to improve things slightly by getting RAM with more precise memory timings, but it probably won't justify the cost for you.
S
szymon124
03-06-2017, 03:52 AM #2

I've found Sapphire Trixx to perform better than Afterburner on my AMD graphics cards. If you're experiencing similar results, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds compared to Afterburner, even though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If this doesn't work, you might only be able to improve things slightly by getting RAM with more precise memory timings, but it probably won't justify the cost for you.

E
ErBrayan
Junior Member
38
03-06-2017, 04:43 PM
#3
I've found Sapphire Trixx to perform better than Afterburner on my AMD graphics cards. If you're experiencing similar results, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds compared to Afterburner, even though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If this doesn't work, you might only be able to improve things slightly by getting RAM with more precise memory timings, but it probably won't justify the cost for you.
E
ErBrayan
03-06-2017, 04:43 PM #3

I've found Sapphire Trixx to perform better than Afterburner on my AMD graphics cards. If you're experiencing similar results, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds compared to Afterburner, even though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If this doesn't work, you might only be able to improve things slightly by getting RAM with more precise memory timings, but it probably won't justify the cost for you.

T
Tjeard_
Member
179
03-13-2017, 09:21 PM
#4
I tried Sapphire Trixx, it worked better than Afterburner on my AMD cards. If your experience matches mine, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds than With With Afterburner, though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If that doesn't help, you'll probably just get tighter memory timings, but it's unlikely to be worth the cost for you.
That tool definitely helped... I gradually adjusted the memory clock and core clock, along with power settings, and found my optimal configuration.
core@1080 mhz
memory@1200mhz
Thanks a lot!
T
Tjeard_
03-13-2017, 09:21 PM #4

I tried Sapphire Trixx, it worked better than Afterburner on my AMD cards. If your experience matches mine, you should be able to reach higher clock speeds than With With Afterburner, though I haven't tested it on a laptop yet.
If that doesn't help, you'll probably just get tighter memory timings, but it's unlikely to be worth the cost for you.
That tool definitely helped... I gradually adjusted the memory clock and core clock, along with power settings, and found my optimal configuration.
core@1080 mhz
memory@1200mhz
Thanks a lot!

F
finnster20
Member
161
03-14-2017, 06:16 AM
#5
Great! It was a success.
F
finnster20
03-14-2017, 06:16 AM #5

Great! It was a success.

R
RG48
Posting Freak
778
03-16-2017, 07:00 AM
#6
Jerry1010 shared his experience with Sapphire Trixx, noting better results compared to Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying higher memory timings and found success by adjusting core and memory clock speeds. Core@1080 mhz and memory@1200mhz were used. He also asked if the utility still works stably at those frequencies.
R
RG48
03-16-2017, 07:00 AM #6

Jerry1010 shared his experience with Sapphire Trixx, noting better results compared to Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying higher memory timings and found success by adjusting core and memory clock speeds. Core@1080 mhz and memory@1200mhz were used. He also asked if the utility still works stably at those frequencies.

J
jonatan1234
Member
215
03-17-2017, 05:22 PM
#7
HSSaran shared his experience with Sapphire Trixx, noting better results than Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying higher clocks with it but found limited gains, especially on laptops. The link provided points to a tech article. If it doesn’t help, he suggests only modest RAM improvements with tighter timings, which likely won’t justify the cost. He confirmed the utility worked well for him, achieving stable performance at 25 fps with anti-aliasing and v-sync.
J
jonatan1234
03-17-2017, 05:22 PM #7

HSSaran shared his experience with Sapphire Trixx, noting better results than Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying higher clocks with it but found limited gains, especially on laptops. The link provided points to a tech article. If it doesn’t help, he suggests only modest RAM improvements with tighter timings, which likely won’t justify the cost. He confirmed the utility worked well for him, achieving stable performance at 25 fps with anti-aliasing and v-sync.

X
Xx_Lauti_xX
Member
58
03-18-2017, 05:38 AM
#8
Jerry1010 shared his experience with various tools and settings. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found it more effective than Afterburner on his AMD cards. He noted that it allowed him to reach higher clock speeds, though he hadn't tested it on a laptop. He provided links for further reading. If the tool didn't help, he suggested only improving RAM with tighter memory timings, which likely wouldn't be worth the cost in his case. He also confirmed that the utility worked well for him, adjusting memory clock and core clock to find optimal performance.
X
Xx_Lauti_xX
03-18-2017, 05:38 AM #8

Jerry1010 shared his experience with various tools and settings. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found it more effective than Afterburner on his AMD cards. He noted that it allowed him to reach higher clock speeds, though he hadn't tested it on a laptop. He provided links for further reading. If the tool didn't help, he suggested only improving RAM with tighter memory timings, which likely wouldn't be worth the cost in his case. He also confirmed that the utility worked well for him, adjusting memory clock and core clock to find optimal performance.

M
MrJoris02
Member
195
03-18-2017, 04:02 PM
#9
HSSaran shared his experience with various overclocking tools and settings, comparing results and offering advice. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found better success than Afterburner on AMD cards, noting it allowed higher clock speeds. He provided links to his tech page and shared personal performance data, including temperatures under load. He also discussed stability issues and the risks of using overclocked cards, especially after driver updates.
M
MrJoris02
03-18-2017, 04:02 PM #9

HSSaran shared his experience with various overclocking tools and settings, comparing results and offering advice. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found better success than Afterburner on AMD cards, noting it allowed higher clock speeds. He provided links to his tech page and shared personal performance data, including temperatures under load. He also discussed stability issues and the risks of using overclocked cards, especially after driver updates.

A
Aples
Member
51
03-23-2017, 03:42 AM
#10
Jerry1010 shared his experience with various overclocking tools and settings, noting better results compared to Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found it effective for achieving higher clock speeds. He provided links to the relevant pages and discussed performance improvements under different configurations.
A
Aples
03-23-2017, 03:42 AM #10

Jerry1010 shared his experience with various overclocking tools and settings, noting better results compared to Afterburner on AMD cards. He mentioned trying Sapphire Trixx and found it effective for achieving higher clock speeds. He provided links to the relevant pages and discussed performance improvements under different configurations.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next