F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop This setting isn't increasing performance further.

This setting isn't increasing performance further.

This setting isn't increasing performance further.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
N
NGWessel
Member
160
03-02-2023, 09:17 AM
#1
Hey there, I noticed the temperatures have dropped a bit since I adjusted them. Some users report 4.8GHz with similar readings. My system stays around 82-83°C max. The 7800X3D doesn’t push beyond 4.4GHz under load. Could you share more details or check your cooling setup? Thanks!
N
NGWessel
03-02-2023, 09:17 AM #1

Hey there, I noticed the temperatures have dropped a bit since I adjusted them. Some users report 4.8GHz with similar readings. My system stays around 82-83°C max. The 7800X3D doesn’t push beyond 4.4GHz under load. Could you share more details or check your cooling setup? Thanks!

T
timberswiss3
Junior Member
23
03-02-2023, 02:04 PM
#2
Really, this board isn't too impressive, and I think it might restrict your CPU's ability to boost. Probably because it doesn't provide enough power or the VRM gets too hot.
T
timberswiss3
03-02-2023, 02:04 PM #2

Really, this board isn't too impressive, and I think it might restrict your CPU's ability to boost. Probably because it doesn't provide enough power or the VRM gets too hot.

M
MechanoidBlue
Member
62
03-18-2023, 11:02 PM
#3
You're asking about the performance numbers behind a system running at 4.4GHz. It seems you're curious if your setup is handling higher frequencies, especially since some components might require AVX support. You mentioned testing with Cinebench R23.5 and noticed different results. The A620 board offers VRM cooling, which helps under load, but the motherboards like 7800X3D and 7900XTX still have limitations. Your question about why you're pairing these chips with an A620 is worth exploring further.
M
MechanoidBlue
03-18-2023, 11:02 PM #3

You're asking about the performance numbers behind a system running at 4.4GHz. It seems you're curious if your setup is handling higher frequencies, especially since some components might require AVX support. You mentioned testing with Cinebench R23.5 and noticed different results. The A620 board offers VRM cooling, which helps under load, but the motherboards like 7800X3D and 7900XTX still have limitations. Your question about why you're pairing these chips with an A620 is worth exploring further.

G
ghostlydigger
Senior Member
500
03-24-2023, 08:11 AM
#4
Will try tomorrow but the more i read about the 620 i regret buying it haha and i donno i tought it was fine but yea not at all Does a b650 board boost higher like 4.8?
G
ghostlydigger
03-24-2023, 08:11 AM #4

Will try tomorrow but the more i read about the 620 i regret buying it haha and i donno i tought it was fine but yea not at all Does a b650 board boost higher like 4.8?

B
Bidouille62
Junior Member
2
03-25-2023, 02:04 AM
#5
The B650 will likely deliver stronger power, enabling greater energy flow into the chip and potentially supporting higher performance.
B
Bidouille62
03-25-2023, 02:04 AM #5

The B650 will likely deliver stronger power, enabling greater energy flow into the chip and potentially supporting higher performance.

R
raven_sing
Junior Member
48
04-01-2023, 12:10 PM
#6
The 200€ b650 boards offer solid performance, delivering a good framerate for their price.
R
raven_sing
04-01-2023, 12:10 PM #6

The 200€ b650 boards offer solid performance, delivering a good framerate for their price.

M
MarcusHolmes1
Junior Member
6
04-01-2023, 05:02 PM
#7
If you purchased it originally, there would be a $50 difference. Spending $200 and not getting a refund on the A620 makes me doubt if the performance upgrade justifies the cost. It could be good for the system's lifespan, but I'm unsure how long the capacitors last under high temperatures. If it really cut the board's life from 10 to 7 years, that might still matter. I don’t know the exact ratings of the capacitors on your motherboard or what the average is. Performance doesn’t seem worth it right now.
M
MarcusHolmes1
04-01-2023, 05:02 PM #7

If you purchased it originally, there would be a $50 difference. Spending $200 and not getting a refund on the A620 makes me doubt if the performance upgrade justifies the cost. It could be good for the system's lifespan, but I'm unsure how long the capacitors last under high temperatures. If it really cut the board's life from 10 to 7 years, that might still matter. I don’t know the exact ratings of the capacitors on your motherboard or what the average is. Performance doesn’t seem worth it right now.

T
TheKroksBG
Member
209
04-02-2023, 04:38 PM
#8
Ty for the information
T
TheKroksBG
04-02-2023, 04:38 PM #8

Ty for the information

M
madison1479
Junior Member
12
04-02-2023, 05:20 PM
#9
You're seeing different results depending on the power level. At lower loads, you achieve 4.7GHz, but with higher power (80W max), the frequency drops to 4.4GHz. This is normal because higher power often limits the operating frequency to ensure stability and efficiency. When no load is applied, the system can reach its full potential frequency of 4.7GHz.
M
madison1479
04-02-2023, 05:20 PM #9

You're seeing different results depending on the power level. At lower loads, you achieve 4.7GHz, but with higher power (80W max), the frequency drops to 4.4GHz. This is normal because higher power often limits the operating frequency to ensure stability and efficiency. When no load is applied, the system can reach its full potential frequency of 4.7GHz.

B
bmarzano
Senior Member
449
04-09-2023, 04:22 PM
#10
demonstrates identical pattern, meaning nothing surprising, ASUS offers the poorest AM5 options.
B
bmarzano
04-09-2023, 04:22 PM #10

demonstrates identical pattern, meaning nothing surprising, ASUS offers the poorest AM5 options.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next