F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming These games require moderate processing power.

These games require moderate processing power.

These games require moderate processing power.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
A
ayahnib
Member
213
06-02-2017, 11:44 PM
#11
Your Russian isn't very strong.
A
ayahnib
06-02-2017, 11:44 PM #11

Your Russian isn't very strong.

F
FLPFive
Member
170
06-03-2017, 08:26 AM
#12
They mentioned 30fps at 1680x1050 using the 670, but the video displays 7770 at 1920x1080. It doesn't matter whether it's low or ultra—it's still quicker than a GTX 670 in my view.
F
FLPFive
06-03-2017, 08:26 AM #12

They mentioned 30fps at 1680x1050 using the 670, but the video displays 7770 at 1920x1080. It doesn't matter whether it's low or ultra—it's still quicker than a GTX 670 in my view.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
06-03-2017, 11:57 AM
#13
I don't see the resolution in the video. I ran GTA5 on GTX670 post-release with medium settings, it exceeded the 2GB VRAM. I began Witcher 3 on GTX670 after release and at high settings it limited to about 25 frames. CDRED improved performance slightly, but the GTX670 remains outdated. In my experience, low-medium settings are what you should aim for to get playable frames.
S
snuttisnutti
06-03-2017, 11:57 AM #13

I don't see the resolution in the video. I ran GTA5 on GTX670 post-release with medium settings, it exceeded the 2GB VRAM. I began Witcher 3 on GTX670 after release and at high settings it limited to about 25 frames. CDRED improved performance slightly, but the GTX670 remains outdated. In my experience, low-medium settings are what you should aim for to get playable frames.

D
daemon29
Member
67
06-15-2017, 07:14 PM
#14
The display quality at 1920x1080 is excellent in the graphics settings. I’m short on extra funds, and Nvidia drivers work better with slower CPUs or I could try a 7950/7970, which was the GTX 670 alternative. I now own an R9 280 or 280X, which is considered entry-level. Your reasoning isn’t clear to me. I made it obvious to another member that they’re using a GTX 970. Did you mean to ask about the cost?
D
daemon29
06-15-2017, 07:14 PM #14

The display quality at 1920x1080 is excellent in the graphics settings. I’m short on extra funds, and Nvidia drivers work better with slower CPUs or I could try a 7950/7970, which was the GTX 670 alternative. I now own an R9 280 or 280X, which is considered entry-level. Your reasoning isn’t clear to me. I made it obvious to another member that they’re using a GTX 970. Did you mean to ask about the cost?

D
destruc7
Member
72
06-17-2017, 10:10 AM
#15
I don't judge you because of the hardware you pick. I'm just straightforward based on my experience with this card and the games available. You shouldn't expect much from it. Maybe I'm mistaken and you'll get improved frames thanks to better drivers, who knows? It's been a while since I used it. Witcher 3 made me discard it from my PC.
D
destruc7
06-17-2017, 10:10 AM #15

I don't judge you because of the hardware you pick. I'm just straightforward based on my experience with this card and the games available. You shouldn't expect much from it. Maybe I'm mistaken and you'll get improved frames thanks to better drivers, who knows? It's been a while since I used it. Witcher 3 made me discard it from my PC.

D
drawesome54
Member
67
06-24-2017, 07:35 PM
#16
I've been playing GTA5 on 750Ti with a mix of med-med-high at 1080p, and it runs smoothly at 40–50fps. I believe a 670 setting could push it to around 60fps on average. GTA5 is quite demanding on the CPU, often hitting the performance of a quad-core processor (or close to it). I’m not sure how much this will impact its performance compared to my Xeon i7-3770, which is just a bit slower.
D
drawesome54
06-24-2017, 07:35 PM #16

I've been playing GTA5 on 750Ti with a mix of med-med-high at 1080p, and it runs smoothly at 40–50fps. I believe a 670 setting could push it to around 60fps on average. GTA5 is quite demanding on the CPU, often hitting the performance of a quad-core processor (or close to it). I’m not sure how much this will impact its performance compared to my Xeon i7-3770, which is just a bit slower.

B
butterlover640
Junior Member
44
06-25-2017, 01:13 AM
#17
@ LokiFire My partner enjoys playing GTA 5 on an AMD Phenom 9750 with a GT630 2gb graphics card and 2gb DDR2 RAM, achieving smooth 30fps at 1080p. The settings are kept low, yet he consistently impresses me with his performance. We haven’t tested Fallout 4 yet, but I think it should work well with reduced settings at the same resolution. We’ve played a variety of titles including Project Cars, Fallout 3/NV, Farcry 3, Tomb Raider (2013), Battlefield 3/4, and more. Some games are challenging, others run perfectly. His CPU is stronger than mine, and the GTX670 is significantly better than the GT630 he currently uses, so adjusting settings should help reach a playable frame rate. You might need to experiment a bit to find the optimal graphics options for each game. Personally, I’d recommend delaying an upgrade for now, save some cash, and watch what sales bring in January. You could possibly find a better GPU for the same budget later on, maybe from Amazon next year. If you’re not in a rush, consider investing a bit more to upgrade or build a new system.
B
butterlover640
06-25-2017, 01:13 AM #17

@ LokiFire My partner enjoys playing GTA 5 on an AMD Phenom 9750 with a GT630 2gb graphics card and 2gb DDR2 RAM, achieving smooth 30fps at 1080p. The settings are kept low, yet he consistently impresses me with his performance. We haven’t tested Fallout 4 yet, but I think it should work well with reduced settings at the same resolution. We’ve played a variety of titles including Project Cars, Fallout 3/NV, Farcry 3, Tomb Raider (2013), Battlefield 3/4, and more. Some games are challenging, others run perfectly. His CPU is stronger than mine, and the GTX670 is significantly better than the GT630 he currently uses, so adjusting settings should help reach a playable frame rate. You might need to experiment a bit to find the optimal graphics options for each game. Personally, I’d recommend delaying an upgrade for now, save some cash, and watch what sales bring in January. You could possibly find a better GPU for the same budget later on, maybe from Amazon next year. If you’re not in a rush, consider investing a bit more to upgrade or build a new system.

U
Udlu
Member
193
06-25-2017, 01:40 AM
#18
Operating at 3.5GHZ, this FX 8320 matches your Phenom's IPC and offers 270X performance that slightly undercuts the 670 but remains stable. It delivers 1680x1050 native resolution using Medium-High settings and maintains 40-60 FPS.
U
Udlu
06-25-2017, 01:40 AM #18

Operating at 3.5GHZ, this FX 8320 matches your Phenom's IPC and offers 270X performance that slightly undercuts the 670 but remains stable. It delivers 1680x1050 native resolution using Medium-High settings and maintains 40-60 FPS.

T
TrilogyXO
Member
154
07-01-2017, 05:54 PM
#19
I used to play GTA 5 on my GTX 670, getting smooth performance at around 60 FPS, and Witcher 3 ran solidly at 30+ FPS. I don’t have any experience with Fortnite.
T
TrilogyXO
07-01-2017, 05:54 PM #19

I used to play GTA 5 on my GTX 670, getting smooth performance at around 60 FPS, and Witcher 3 ran solidly at 30+ FPS. I don’t have any experience with Fortnite.

L
livvy66
Member
129
07-01-2017, 11:04 PM
#20
The 670 performs optimally at 1080p with smooth 60fps performance. Many believe cards are weak simply because they were released in 2012, but the 670 is only about 2% below top-tier options.
L
livvy66
07-01-2017, 11:04 PM #20

The 670 performs optimally at 1080p with smooth 60fps performance. Many believe cards are weak simply because they were released in 2012, but the 670 is only about 2% below top-tier options.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next