Switched to AMD instead of Intel. Got feedback.
Switched to AMD instead of Intel. Got feedback.
So I've recently chosen to leave Intel behind, mainly because of the bad experience I had with ASUS' X99 2011-v3 X99 Pro board over the past six years. I upgraded right when it launched for unbelievable prices. The only RAM available for over $800 was 64GB at 3200Mhz for GSkill Ripjaws back then—it cost a fortune and the company pulled out of the 2011-v3 line a few months after I bought in. "That was my error for a top socket..." but hey, I'm still dreaming! This time I'm going for a simpler build. After hearing great things about MSI's Tomahawk series, I picked the MAG B550. I've been fixing computers and had an AMD Ryzen 7 1700X in the garage, so I decided to keep that until I can upgrade the CPU later. I also chose two 16GB DDR4 Patriot Vipor 3600mhz sticks. I'll add more later when I really want to geek out. No other motivation. I bought an MSI Gaming AMD MECH RX 6600 X2 with 8GB, switching from a Zotac 1660. Right now my main concern is getting the best value for money. My current setup isn't doing well, probably because of the older 1700X CPU. To fix the slowdown, I'm planning to upgrade to the CPU. I'm eyeing the AMD 3950X, but also the Ryzen 5000 lineup. Between the Ryzen 9 5900X and the Ryzen 7 5800X, I'm leaning toward the 7 5800X. Because of budget constraints, I'm seriously considering the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G for around $250—right in my range, while the other two options sit between $50 and $100. My question is: will the RX 6600 work smoothly with the 5700G compared to the 5800 or 5900? Or will it not mesh well enough to make a real difference? I've done one build before for an AMD APU, but that was back in 2013-2014. I'm open to feedback and advice. Just a heads-up—I have a severe TBI, so I apologize if I get mixed up or ask too many questions.
The 5700X can help you utilize your GPU to its full potential based on resolution and settings, provided it fits your budget and you're considering an upgrade now. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the performance doesn't impress much compared to the 6600, which is still a solid GPU. Regarding any combined benefits from AMD components, I'm skeptical about significant gains—those extra frames would likely come from simpler fixes like better cooling or higher-quality parts.
Sure, I can provide a clearer explanation. Let me break it down in simpler terms.
AMD and Nvidia have different strengths in the market. The AMD G-series performs much better than the Nvidia 1660, which is why you prefer it. The 6600 really outshines the 1660 you owned. Your experience with the 2080TI burning out before a major GPU crash in early 2020 shows how timing matters. You chose to upgrade later rather than risking more expensive models.
I'm a 1080P gamer who still has a TBI, and it seems higher resolution causes me more nausea. I had to adjust during recovery since games helped improve my hand-eye coordination and thinking skills. Switching from lower to higher resolutions really affects my brain—it's hard to put into words. I'm ordering the 5700X because it's just $30 more.
I just picked Nvidia as an illustration because I've always relied on Nvidia GPUs. It's unclear if pairing an AMD GPU with an AMD CPU would improve efficiency, and testing AMD's offerings is difficult since Intel doesn't control Nvidia.
Some CPUs are built for specific tasks. For example, AMD threadrippers/EPYC chips are built for server and workload applications, not gaming. Think of CPUs like cars—Ryzen 7 5950X is a high-performance sports car suited for speed and sharp handling, similar to a Ferrari; it’s great for gaming but not optimized for everyday driving. On the other hand, Ryzen Threadripper is more like a powerful truck, built for heavy workloads like rendering and multimedia.
That makes sense. The thread suggests the 5700G isn't suitable for your needs.