Star Wars Battlefront Beta performance details! (My test results.)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next

xJENKSY123
Junior Member

10-29-2016, 02:06 PM

I ran a benchmark for Battlefront yesterday and found it to be excellent with optimization. I'm using the newest 358.50 Nvidia driver specs: GTX 770 2GB, i5 4690K, 8GB RAM, Corsair Vengeance Pro 2133Mhz. This setup should help you understand performance in GTX 970/960/760 configurations. I suggest using FXAA and reducing post-processing effects to avoid noticeable stuttering in the 50s or keeping effects while lowering quality.

xJENKSY123

10-29-2016, 02:06 PM #1

Matthieu_p
Member

217

10-29-2016, 03:40 PM

It runs smoothly on a 970 with a 4460, delivering up to 1080p at a steady 72 FPS, consistently maintaining around 61 FPS. CPU usage sits at 65% while GPU load reaches 98%. Memory consumption is 6.5GB total and 2.5GB dedicated to video.

Matthieu_p

10-29-2016, 03:40 PM #2

Jesser30
Junior Member

10-31-2016, 02:46 AM

EA handled optimization well, especially in a beta phase.

Jesser30

10-31-2016, 02:46 AM #3

EA handled optimization well, especially in a beta phase.

Kieshy_
Junior Member

10-31-2016, 03:06 AM

Intense cold impacts frostbite heavily, causing scores under 60, particularly on the battlefield where structures collapse near you

Kieshy_

10-31-2016, 03:06 AM #4

Intense cold impacts frostbite heavily, causing scores under 60, particularly on the battlefield where structures collapse near you

Kungpanda
Junior Member

10-31-2016, 10:13 AM

It stays above sixty, reaching a minimum of sixty-one.

Kungpanda

10-31-2016, 10:13 AM #5

It stays above sixty, reaching a minimum of sixty-one.

Master949
Junior Member

10-31-2016, 12:09 PM

They generally handle graphics well, though they aren't from Ubisoft. They've occasionally made mistakes in areas like server operations and multiplayer problems. I hope the release goes smoothly.

Master949

10-31-2016, 12:09 PM #6

They generally handle graphics well, though they aren't from Ubisoft. They've occasionally made mistakes in areas like server operations and multiplayer problems. I hope the release goes smoothly.

sru2016
Junior Member

11-01-2016, 11:58 AM

This title performs better on SLI compared to most launched titles. I consistently maintain around 70fps, especially in intense moments. Usually I'm holding steady near 80-85fps at 1440p ultra.

sru2016

11-01-2016, 11:58 AM #7

This title performs better on SLI compared to most launched titles. I consistently maintain around 70fps, especially in intense moments. Usually I'm holding steady near 80-85fps at 1440p ultra.

UnicornWuver
Member

193

11-02-2016, 08:19 AM

Achieved an average of 84 frames per second with your 970 and 3570 units fully boosted (with AA) during the Walker assault.

UnicornWuver

11-02-2016, 08:19 AM #8

Achieved an average of 84 frames per second with your 970 and 3570 units fully boosted (with AA) during the Walker assault.

livtheviking
Posting Freak

846

11-02-2016, 02:47 PM

Same as here with my stock sign.

livtheviking

11-02-2016, 02:47 PM #9

Same as here with my stock sign.

Inezze009
Senior Member

716

11-06-2016, 08:30 AM

#10

It's great to see another AMD Gaming Evolved release and all the Nvidia fans enjoying smooth performance and impressive visuals. The way PC gaming should be! Regarding the choice, the map appears very appealing even at 1080p resolution. Your FOV might seem high unless your screen is positioned close to your eyes. Or perhaps you prefer that setting for better multiplayer advantage? I think it could work well on a very large display.

Inezze009

11-06-2016, 08:30 AM #10

Pages (2): 1 2 Next