Some networks refuse to let bridges connect devices.
Some networks refuse to let bridges connect devices.
This involved a lengthy effort to configure my own router and access point. Initially, I was renting a college house with Gig fiber, but my ISP installed the connection while I was in class. They left unclear instructions and only provided a vague guide on connecting via their website. When I tried using a browser, the setup page refused to connect. I reached out to their support, who suggested only basic options like DHCP and didn’t allow changing the SSID or enabling bridge mode. Adding my own router seems unlikely to make a significant difference.
They said they won't allow Bridged Mode on the modem/router, so you're good. Installing your own router will set up double NAT. This might create problems for specific server hosting but isn't harmful overall. For port forwarding, you'll need to do it through the ISP's modem/router if permitted. Outside that, using your own routers in AP mode won't really help and could cause conflicts with certain services or apps.
Hi @rbrowne11 Many ISPs block this kind of activity. Bridge mode isn’t a solid option. Ideally, you’d prefer to swap the modem/router directly connected to your home line. But ISPs usually restrict that too. You might try configuring Ubiquity AP-AC and Router as just an access point; otherwise, you’ll end up with NAT behind NAT.
Are you connecting via http://192.168.18.1 to reach the Nokia gateway? The login must be admin, and the password should be found on the label. I’m still checking if this device can use native bridge mode. I’ll update once I’m sure. Also, confirming the Nokia model is G-240W-E? Edited September 23, 2019 by ddennis002
It's straightforward. The device you mentioned is the sole point of contact for tech support. It's similar to when you reach out to Xfinity for an issue—support will focus on their equipment and may avoid handling unrelated matters. Sometimes they prefer to stay within their scope, which can limit help for problems outside their systems. Occasionally, you need to connect with the appropriate team to resolve things effectively. I've seen cases where someone tried to get the gateway into bridge mode but the support agent had no idea what they were dealing with.
I was connecting via http://100.64.0.254 to reach the gateway, which matches the setup of my phone and computer. I’ll need to switch to another address once I’m back. This is the G-240W-E model.
As an ISP technician, I usually configure our gear in bridgemode. Once the setup is complete, I just confirm everything is working. I’m aware the ISP won’t back this up, and I’m only doing it for my own use.
From what I understand in the configuration guide, there doesn’t appear to be a bridge mode option listed for the Nokia device. That doesn’t mean it’s not available—it just isn’t documented here. However, it does support DMZ, which can assist with double NAT issues. You’d still have two internal subnets, but you wouldn’t need to forward ports on the Nokia itself. Still, certain services might cause problems. If you can’t locate a specific bridge mode setting, you could operate the device like an AP for Wi-Fi and switch mode on your router, letting the Nokia manage routing and DHCP instead.
Is this a multi-tenent house? There are definitely reasons to not allow an ONT to be bridged