F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop s around Intel's 10th generation CPU leaks highlight concerns over design flaws and performance issues.

s around Intel's 10th generation CPU leaks highlight concerns over design flaws and performance issues.

s around Intel's 10th generation CPU leaks highlight concerns over design flaws and performance issues.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
soul_harveste
Member
223
10-03-2020, 12:59 PM
#1
I wish I had not purchased the 9600k source site: https://wccftech.com/intel-10th-gen-desk...oard-leak/
S
soul_harveste
10-03-2020, 12:59 PM #1

I wish I had not purchased the 9600k source site: https://wccftech.com/intel-10th-gen-desk...oard-leak/

C
clay__
Member
159
10-03-2020, 02:55 PM
#2
If the performance hits 10/20 at 5.1GHz and it supports all the cores, it should work fine. The main factor is the cost overall. Ryzen provides more cores with a bit lower speed.
C
clay__
10-03-2020, 02:55 PM #2

If the performance hits 10/20 at 5.1GHz and it supports all the cores, it should work fine. The main factor is the cost overall. Ryzen provides more cores with a bit lower speed.

Z
Zakk_M
Junior Member
6
10-11-2020, 08:02 AM
#3
It seems this table was shared earlier. Would you like me to review it or discuss its contents?
Z
Zakk_M
10-11-2020, 08:02 AM #3

It seems this table was shared earlier. Would you like me to review it or discuss its contents?

U
UnicornWuver
Member
193
10-11-2020, 04:13 PM
#4
Our dependable site for precise leaks and gossip.
U
UnicornWuver
10-11-2020, 04:13 PM #4

Our dependable site for precise leaks and gossip.

N
NerdiYT
Junior Member
37
10-15-2020, 09:07 AM
#5
The new i3s are essentially i7s from the past, which is impressive. Thanks, AMD! Hyperthreading throughout the lineup is a nice update, though I hope those Pentiums had real quad-core support.
N
NerdiYT
10-15-2020, 09:07 AM #5

The new i3s are essentially i7s from the past, which is impressive. Thanks, AMD! Hyperthreading throughout the lineup is a nice update, though I hope those Pentiums had real quad-core support.

R
reddcool8480
Junior Member
47
11-06-2020, 06:40 AM
#6
Suggesting 35W for a 10-core processor capable of 4.5GHz raises concerns, especially since Intel typically bases TDP on the lowest values.
R
reddcool8480
11-06-2020, 06:40 AM #6

Suggesting 35W for a 10-core processor capable of 4.5GHz raises concerns, especially since Intel typically bases TDP on the lowest values.

L
LilStege
Member
205
11-13-2020, 05:50 AM
#7
It has a single core, 12 threads, and uses minimal power.
L
LilStege
11-13-2020, 05:50 AM #7

It has a single core, 12 threads, and uses minimal power.

H
Happeh_
Junior Member
42
11-14-2020, 12:18 PM
#8
What's happening in those comments? It seems like a mix of confusion and curiosity about the article.
H
Happeh_
11-14-2020, 12:18 PM #8

What's happening in those comments? It seems like a mix of confusion and curiosity about the article.

R
robbie172
Member
63
11-21-2020, 01:11 AM
#9
Consensus suggests these figures are on the lower side. I've been curious about Intel's actual power consumption metrics across their latest lineup—from ultra-low mobile chips to high-end Xeons. The idea is to measure real-world performance under strict conditions: all cores at base frequency, using a Prime95 small FFT test (no shortcuts), on a board with limited VRMs. It would mean the power usage never exceeds what the CPU itself reports at its lowest operating point, even in extreme temperatures. I've considered a scenario where a chip needs to run at 1.4-1.45V or similar to stay stable, but that pushes it toward being seen as defective if not handled carefully. My own experience with the 4790K shows it can reach 100°C and throttle under load, while the 4790K+ often stays cooler and handles higher temps. In contrast, a poorly designed board could make even modest CPUs behave like power-hungry giants. The numbers I've seen for non-Prime tests range between 4.7-4.8 GHz at various voltages, but real-world efficiency matters more than peak figures.
R
robbie172
11-21-2020, 01:11 AM #9

Consensus suggests these figures are on the lower side. I've been curious about Intel's actual power consumption metrics across their latest lineup—from ultra-low mobile chips to high-end Xeons. The idea is to measure real-world performance under strict conditions: all cores at base frequency, using a Prime95 small FFT test (no shortcuts), on a board with limited VRMs. It would mean the power usage never exceeds what the CPU itself reports at its lowest operating point, even in extreme temperatures. I've considered a scenario where a chip needs to run at 1.4-1.45V or similar to stay stable, but that pushes it toward being seen as defective if not handled carefully. My own experience with the 4790K shows it can reach 100°C and throttle under load, while the 4790K+ often stays cooler and handles higher temps. In contrast, a poorly designed board could make even modest CPUs behave like power-hungry giants. The numbers I've seen for non-Prime tests range between 4.7-4.8 GHz at various voltages, but real-world efficiency matters more than peak figures.

S
112
12-02-2020, 07:51 PM
#10
Intel's thermal limits are becoming increasingly impractical, mirroring the trend of the base frequency. They're likely to release processors with a 500MHz clock speed labeled as a 5W TDP, then boost it to 5GHz while omitting any real power rating. When tested at that higher frequency—intended to match the advertised figure—they consume around 150W. My machine uses a CPU with a 15W TDP that can be pushed up to 25W, but under heavy use it exceeds 40W. It's confusing to market a low figure as the standard while implying you can always go higher when it's clear they're already at their maximum.
S
superdavideito
12-02-2020, 07:51 PM #10

Intel's thermal limits are becoming increasingly impractical, mirroring the trend of the base frequency. They're likely to release processors with a 500MHz clock speed labeled as a 5W TDP, then boost it to 5GHz while omitting any real power rating. When tested at that higher frequency—intended to match the advertised figure—they consume around 150W. My machine uses a CPU with a 15W TDP that can be pushed up to 25W, but under heavy use it exceeds 40W. It's confusing to market a low figure as the standard while implying you can always go higher when it's clear they're already at their maximum.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next