Ryzen works well, but some individuals should reconsider...
Ryzen works well, but some individuals should reconsider...
In short, Intel is essential for my current setup, and many recommendations keep pushing Ryzen. Here, even when I emphasized needing an Intel CPU, the conversation stayed focused on that point. Some platforms dismiss Intel 2020 as outdated or inferior, especially when it comes to modern software that demands AVX-512. While I use a Ryzen 2600X for gaming, my workstation demands an Intel processor. Not everyone understands CPU nuances, but performance matters. Stop suggesting Ryzen to those who insist on Intel, and consider the series you’re using.
Complaining about others' complaints... wow, that's intense...
Consider Cascade Lake X for better performance. AVX 512 is available on Intel and AMD, but AMD focuses on AVX2 rather than AVX 512, which can result in slower processing. You might need to rely on brute force for speed gains, though this isn't the most efficient approach when a faster option exists. It seems Cascade Lake X, also called 10th gen Skylake X, offers more AVX support compared to consumer platforms.
You've essentially captured the main reasons behind Intel's current lack of enthusiasm.
hey, its different silicon at least. more expencive silicon, but hey, you get it for cheaper. and one cant deny that the hardware has its AVX512 usecase. other AVX workloads id probably look at that or look elsewhere, but sometimes you dont have an option. its one of the few exceptions to rule 2 .
You mentioned your recent update about Cascade Lake X CPUs without indicating a need for an Intel CPU. Your comments suggested you were considering upgrading your motherboard due to cost concerns, and you even hinted that your current CPU is struggling to keep up with friends using 3600x. In your latest message, you changed the tone to clearly state a preference for an Intel CPU, which wasn't present earlier. It seems you might have mixed up the recommendations at the end of your post. LMAO, it looks like you were joking about recommending Ryzen later on.
Basically I am trying to get 10920X. But since the "launch" it's not available anywhere. absolutely 0 stock everywhere lol. basically... If they cut the price 70% instead of 50% it would have been a lot better and peopl probably would have said better things about it. That one is nothing... As I mentioned in post people here are more sensible. I asked the same question in some facebook pages and I got roasted so hard for wanting, or rather needing, an Intel...
no, people would be pretty mad the charged a 130% premium on a product for 2 generation without any real change. atm people are pretty salty they charged 90% premium on it. you would get fairly close performance with the 3950x compared to that chip. it would be lower iirc, but not all that much. (i havent doublechecked that tho, ill have a look at it) edit: that would be a secondary option tho. if you ever get tired of waiting for a product to get in stock
Despite this, my argument remains valid. You mentioned needing an Intel CPU and being criticized for it, but I don’t see that reflected anywhere on this platform. If it’s on Facebook or another site, then the responsibility lies there.