F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Ryzen 7900x or Ryzen 7900 non-x?

Ryzen 7900x or Ryzen 7900 non-x?

Ryzen 7900x or Ryzen 7900 non-x?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
1
16_1_1998
Junior Member
48
05-05-2022, 09:46 AM
#1
The Ryzen 7900X and its non-X counterpart are nearly identical in price near my location. Since I focus on video editing with occasional gaming, I favor energy-efficient processors. The 7900X isn’t particularly efficient, so upgrading to the non-X model might be a better choice. Regarding performance, using the 65W Eco Mode won’t match the 7900X’s output—it will be similar but not as strong.
1
16_1_1998
05-05-2022, 09:46 AM #1

The Ryzen 7900X and its non-X counterpart are nearly identical in price near my location. Since I focus on video editing with occasional gaming, I favor energy-efficient processors. The 7900X isn’t particularly efficient, so upgrading to the non-X model might be a better choice. Regarding performance, using the 65W Eco Mode won’t match the 7900X’s output—it will be similar but not as strong.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
05-06-2022, 05:00 AM
#2
The 7900 is the 9900X but with slightly reduced performance.
S
snuttisnutti
05-06-2022, 05:00 AM #2

The 7900 is the 9900X but with slightly reduced performance.

X
xDirtBlock
Member
68
05-06-2022, 10:23 AM
#3
I’d prefer the X option if they match the price. Using binned silicon would help. Keeping voltage away from direct contact and just tweaking power caps suggests better performance with similar power draw. I’m not sure about the ECO feature; usually, the real power cap is about 35% more than the rated TDP. For a 65W TDP component, the actual limit would be around 88W. Putting it at 65W would actually be less than a standard 65W part.
X
xDirtBlock
05-06-2022, 10:23 AM #3

I’d prefer the X option if they match the price. Using binned silicon would help. Keeping voltage away from direct contact and just tweaking power caps suggests better performance with similar power draw. I’m not sure about the ECO feature; usually, the real power cap is about 35% more than the rated TDP. For a 65W TDP component, the actual limit would be around 88W. Putting it at 65W would actually be less than a standard 65W part.

S
Sukibooki
Member
204
05-06-2022, 04:14 PM
#4
I hadn't considered that before, and indeed the X model costs roughly $15 more than the non-X version. My aim is to lower the chip's power consumption, so using an eco mode at 88W should work similarly or even better. Also, does lowering the clock speed also cut idle power usage?
S
Sukibooki
05-06-2022, 04:14 PM #4

I hadn't considered that before, and indeed the X model costs roughly $15 more than the non-X version. My aim is to lower the chip's power consumption, so using an eco mode at 88W should work similarly or even better. Also, does lowering the clock speed also cut idle power usage?

P
Pigzerd
Member
56
05-06-2022, 08:59 PM
#5
Even without knowing the ECO setting, at the same power level the performance should be marginally higher. Changing the voltage curve to undervolt isn’t something I’ve done before.
P
Pigzerd
05-06-2022, 08:59 PM #5

Even without knowing the ECO setting, at the same power level the performance should be marginally higher. Changing the voltage curve to undervolt isn’t something I’ve done before.

M
MorielM
Member
69
05-07-2022, 02:00 AM
#6
M
MorielM
05-07-2022, 02:00 AM #6

_
_FryYT_
Junior Member
16
05-12-2022, 06:46 PM
#7
9900x is great, though it adds roughly $100 extra. Maybe it's worth it to grab 7950x instead.
_
_FryYT_
05-12-2022, 06:46 PM #7

9900x is great, though it adds roughly $100 extra. Maybe it's worth it to grab 7950x instead.

M
master_scope
Posting Freak
794
05-12-2022, 11:56 PM
#8
Previous 7900x buyer with a friend who owns a 7900. Both situations are quite alike. Get the more affordable option.
M
master_scope
05-12-2022, 11:56 PM #8

Previous 7900x buyer with a friend who owns a 7900. Both situations are quite alike. Get the more affordable option.

S
SivTheGreat
Member
209
05-13-2022, 01:55 AM
#9
Have you ever experimented with undervolting or Eco settings to cut power usage? For me, the non-X option is $10 cheaper compared to X variant. I’m really focused on power use, but if the performance boost is just 5-6%, I’d pick the more efficient chip.
S
SivTheGreat
05-13-2022, 01:55 AM #9

Have you ever experimented with undervolting or Eco settings to cut power usage? For me, the non-X option is $10 cheaper compared to X variant. I’m really focused on power use, but if the performance boost is just 5-6%, I’d pick the more efficient chip.

S
SuperTao
Junior Member
10
05-14-2022, 12:58 AM
#10
It’s likely to cost around $500 extra since it resists degradation. So once more, no...
S
SuperTao
05-14-2022, 12:58 AM #10

It’s likely to cost around $500 extra since it resists degradation. So once more, no...

Pages (2): 1 2 Next