Rdr 2 or witcher 3 (which one is better)
Rdr 2 or witcher 3 (which one is better)
Hello everyone, I hope you're all doing well. Please stay safe and healthy. I understand you have more experience with gaming, so I thought it would be helpful to share this idea with you. It might sound a bit unusual at first, but I wanted to explain my perspective. I've played both games and really enjoy them. I'm interested in buying both, but because of budget constraints, I can only get one at a time. How do you feel when you have to pick just one? That's exactly what I'm thinking right now... Confused, but I appreciate your understanding.
Why am I considering these titles?
1. RDR – I've mastered it long ago, but with some adjustments to the graphics settings, after upgrading my PC, I can now play it at ultra settings in 4K resolution without any issues.
2. Witcher 3 – I finished this game back in 2015, but my ending choice wasn't great and I didn't fully explore the open world or beat all the bosses. Feel free to share your thoughts! Your opinion is really important to me.
This choice seems open to interpretation, offering a chance to explore different options. I’d lean toward The Witcher since it provides a richer experience beyond what you might already know.
You've finished both titles and are unsure which one stands out more. You're seeking honest opinions from others to help decide. While I don't fully grasp the discussion, my take is that The Witcher 3 offers a superior experience compared to Red Dead Redemption 2, which is enjoyable but less engaging in most situations.
@dizmo and @Middcore thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’ll remember that. Actually, I was thinking maybe I’m mistaken and I might be wrong—sometimes I just want to be clarified. Let’s look at the facts. You both have excellent titles, which makes it tough to pick one. Also, I can only purchase one title at a time because of budget constraints. Hope you understand.
It seems you're eager to dive into Witcher 3. The game is quite extensive—completing it in over 200 hours felt like a challenge, especially when you wanted to skip parts of the story.
Have you finished the Witcher 3 expansion? You mentioned earlier that you believed you played W3 in 2015, even though Blood & Wine came out in 2016. The Blood & Wine expansion is quite extensive, almost functioning as a separate experience, with its own setting. I’m unsure about the extent of optional content, but I managed to complete all main quests and side missions available. Monster hunts were mostly done, though not every treasure hunt. There’s a lot of engaging material. After more than 100 hours, I usually reach a satisfying conclusion. Outcomes for quests can vary depending on your decisions in W3. If you’ve played RDR2 twice but haven’t revisited W3 since 2015, it might feel more current. Playing W3 on the console could look even better on PC, and there are visual mods to enhance it. I haven’t finished RDR2 myself, but what I’ve tried seemed more structured and less open-ended.
I understand your perspective @Delicieuxz and I’ll address your questions. 1. W3 and Blood & Wine share a similar narrative, though they’re distinct stories rather than a direct sequel. 2. The best mod for W3 depends on your needs, but I’ve noticed some issues after installing GTA V mods—like unexpected weather changes even at night. It’s worth checking if the mod you’re using is stable before uninstalling.