Rdr 2 or witcher 3 (which one is better)
Rdr 2 or witcher 3 (which one is better)
Blood and Wine unfolds after the events of the Witcher 3 base game, extending Geralt’s journey. It appears as a major quest within the base Witcher 3 experience, launching Geralt to a completely different setting. These missions aren’t linked to the W3 base game or its storyline. The content follows the W3 base game and is included in the Game of the Year edition alongside Heart of Stone. Regrettably, you missed a discount on Witcher 3 at GoG; it was offered at a very low price, typically a few times annually. Edit: Currently available for 80% off on Steam: https://store.steampowered.com/sub/124923/
You're referring to adjustments in the main plot if you buy Blood and Wine.
Blood and Wine expands beyond the original narrative, introducing a completely different setting not found in the base story. The other DLC for the GotY edition of W3, Hearts of Stone is more concise, with parts set within the main game world and others in a separate area. B&W represents a significant addition, offering a fresh experience after finishing the core game.
Well? I think it’s about preferences, but maybe it’s more that I’d focus on the story, the gameplay, and the world details.
I’d probably enjoy Red Dead 2, especially with the right setup to really test it. Still, I understand why people find it odd—both games have their own strengths and experiences. Since you’ve played both, you know what they provide, but asking for a direct comparison feels a bit unclear. Maybe rephrase your question?
I hope it didn't come across as mean spirited, as that wasn't my intention. It's just that you had quite a lot of experience with the games so I wasn't sure what I could offer. Certainly, if you were saying you'd played both games on console and now had the opportunity to play them again on a high end rig, and which was the more beautiful looking etc...I could see why you might be unsure. Anyway, whichever you pick you will have a great experience.