Raven Ridge Athlon 3000G model
Raven Ridge Athlon 3000G model
Some gigabyte CPU support pages mention two versions of the Athlon 3000GS: YD3000C6M2OFH labeled as Picasso and YD3000C6M2OFB as Raven Ridge. It appears AMD altered its architecture, grouping these chips together despite different manufacturing processes and motherboard compatibility. I’m curious about how their performance might vary.
All 3000G chips come from Raven Ridge and use 14nm technology. My version is an OFH with a dual-core Raven Ridge-2 processor. Picasso was never designed for dual-core performance. It’s confusing how AMD hides it as Picasso, especially when the CPUID matches.
Do you notice any variation in how each model handles performance? I’ve been using my 3000g for a while now, and my PC has been acting sluggish, so I considered reinstalling. It turns out some users report high CPU usage as Picasso and 12nm, while others see Raven Ridge and 14nm.
CPU-Z has updated its reporting for the 3000G. The CPUID matches what I have, and the tool infers the code name accurately. I haven’t seen an "FB" version before; it seems they’re only available in ES form. If performance remains unchanged, it’s likely due to modern spinning HDDs. What model number is shown on your CPU’s packaging?
Most of the non-ES3 3000g available locally finish with FB. I picked an FH model specifically to test my Gigabyte B450 MBOO BIOS. It looks like older models (pre/early 2020) have FB endings. I’m curious about trying an FB just to compare the differences. I’m not confident in using tools like cpuid, but I also don’t want to deldel them.
Hey there, this discussion is quite old now, but I believe there’s still useful data for those browsing online, especially since AMD recently re-launched the 3000G in late 2023. There are updated boxed models with refreshed designs and improved cooling solutions, moving away from the smaller aluminum heat sinks I had before. Although I used my original FX Wraith cooler, I’ve been looking into the 3000G because I’m planning to build a new PC to replace my older one running on PCI-E 2.0. With my processor, extra DDR4 RAM, and all the right components, I needed a motherboard supporting PCI-4.0 for faster performance. I ended up choosing the Gigabyte B550I AORUS Pro AX, making sure it had both M.2 slots—one for PCI-4.0 and one for CPU. The M.2 slot from the 3000G will only work with PCI-3.0 at the moment, but I’m planning to upgrade to a Ryzen 5000 later so both can run smoothly on PCI-4.0. Many people don’t realize their motherboards might not support PCI-4.0 if the CPU is still limited to PCI-3.0.
I overclocked my CPU to 4.1 GHz, but settled for 4.0 GHz after testing. My GPU is set at 1600 MHz. The main challenge is getting memory to overclock past 3400 MT/s. I’ve reduced timings to 20 and tried increasing speeds, but even a jump to 3466 doesn’t get me past that threshold. Memory temps usually stay around 35°C, occasionally reaching 42°C.
I noticed my motherboard has an update for the "Picasso" version, which seems relevant for the new Athlon 3000G and Athlon Golds. However, I’m unsure if this update includes my 3000G processor. Some users thought it did, but others are confused. I saw a BIOS note suggesting an update is available, but it’s unclear whether it applies to my model.
I’ve been delaying the BIOS upgrade because some boards claim compatibility with older CPUs, but manufacturers often remove support for older models to accommodate newer ones. Since I needed a compatible processor for the new BIOS, I went with the 3000G initially. Once I upgraded to the 5700G, I no longer needed it, which made me reconsider keeping it around.
Before making any changes, I want to double-check compatibility after the BIOS update. Most boards were designed for older CPUs before the Ryzen 5000 series, so my new board should still work. Still, I’m a bit anxious about fitting everything together, especially with limited space in the case. I might even switch the ATX power supply to a smaller size to free up room for larger drives.
There were several unexpected issues during this build—things that usually don’t pop up. I’m hoping this thread will help others who find similar problems. Overall, it’s been a learning experience, and I’ll keep an eye on updates before making any final decisions.
It's essentially the same core concept as when AMD initially developed Deneb for AM3, then updated its design with a new approach and various adjustments that transformed it into a distinct product while retaining the Deneb branding. I'm not surprised there have been modifications to the Athlon "G" series because this line is positioned somewhere unusual. It's a low-power processor ideal for laptops yet still capable of desktop use, offering more character than typical G models. Perfect for basic office tasks and web browsing, but it falls short for serious gaming due to its limitations. I own one (220G) and... well, I strongly dislike it because it interferes with USB functionality in Windows 7 (regardless of whether it previously worked). Microsoft attempted to push users toward Windows 10, but even after a firmware reset, the system still refuses to install USB drivers. (Heh-Heh) I managed to bypass that issue too—I discovered a workaround. They argued AM4 hardware wouldn't function with Windows 7, but that's clearly incorrect. Currently, running an AM4 works smoothly, though compatibility with Windows 7 remains a hassle. On Linux, everything functions perfectly.