F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Quantum Break Dx12

Quantum Break Dx12

Quantum Break Dx12

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
kenaaa
Junior Member
Find
7
02-21-2016, 03:19 PM
#1
No, I haven't used Quantum Break with DX12 before.
Reply
Reply
K
kenaaa
02-21-2016, 03:19 PM #1

No, I haven't used Quantum Break with DX12 before.

Reply
Reply
D
DaniilKozhuhar
Member
Find
143
02-22-2016, 09:59 AM
#2
It's exclusively DX12 only...
Reply
Reply
D
DaniilKozhuhar
02-22-2016, 09:59 AM #2

It's exclusively DX12 only...

Reply
Reply
E
EssieFlo
Member
Find
174
03-01-2016, 09:37 AM
#3
It's a DX 12 game with poor execution of that format.
Reply
Reply
E
EssieFlo
03-01-2016, 09:37 AM #3

It's a DX 12 game with poor execution of that format.

Reply
Reply
A
AdrianSadiki
Junior Member
Find
12
03-01-2016, 06:11 PM
#4
Yup
Reply
Reply
A
AdrianSadiki
03-01-2016, 06:11 PM #4

Yup

Reply
Reply
S
sidyfan
Member
Find
151
03-23-2016, 01:06 PM
#5
The game's V-Sync setup was really poor. Extremely bad.
Reply
Reply
S
sidyfan
03-23-2016, 01:06 PM #5

The game's V-Sync setup was really poor. Extremely bad.

Reply
Reply
J
jayjay0424
Member
Find
105
03-23-2016, 02:23 PM
#6
I think the issues stem more from UWP than from DX12 directly, Hitman and Ashes perform adequately
Reply
Reply
J
jayjay0424
03-23-2016, 02:23 PM #6

I think the issues stem more from UWP than from DX12 directly, Hitman and Ashes perform adequately

Reply
Reply
F
fatrick135
Junior Member
Find
3
03-23-2016, 04:39 PM
#7
Double buffer synchronization, introduced in 2016.
Reply
Reply
F
fatrick135
03-23-2016, 04:39 PM #7

Double buffer synchronization, introduced in 2016.

Reply
Reply
S
Stifelplays
Member
Find
112
03-23-2016, 04:53 PM
#8
The chart really got me chuckling at how tough it was to hit those targets for Nvidia cards. It shows: one of my 2,290 units could compete with the 980Ti, and my brother's GTX 770 handled nearly half the frames of a close friend's 270X... That’s quite the feat!
Reply
Reply
S
Stifelplays
03-23-2016, 04:53 PM #8

The chart really got me chuckling at how tough it was to hit those targets for Nvidia cards. It shows: one of my 2,290 units could compete with the 980Ti, and my brother's GTX 770 handled nearly half the frames of a close friend's 270X... That’s quite the feat!

Reply
Reply
L
lizzard89
Senior Member
Find
707
03-25-2016, 05:14 AM
#9
No, I'm not suggesting the outcomes are intentionally misleading.
Reply
Reply
L
lizzard89
03-25-2016, 05:14 AM #9

No, I'm not suggesting the outcomes are intentionally misleading.

Reply
Reply
X
xXStrikeBackXx
Member
Find
220
03-25-2016, 07:08 AM
#10
I've tried it. Runs 'OK' at 1080p on one GTX 970. Sadly, SLI is not supported. Neither is overlay software of any kind, so I have no idea how the game is performing framerate-wise. ANY attempt to run it at resolutions over 1080p results in an epic slideshow...at any IQ setting. Overall, it's a huge disappointment thus far. I foolishly pre-ordered the Xbox One version expecting the PC version would be all peaches and sunshine. Yet another example to add to the ever-growing list of reasons why pre-ordering games is bad.
Reply
Reply
X
xXStrikeBackXx
03-25-2016, 07:08 AM #10

I've tried it. Runs 'OK' at 1080p on one GTX 970. Sadly, SLI is not supported. Neither is overlay software of any kind, so I have no idea how the game is performing framerate-wise. ANY attempt to run it at resolutions over 1080p results in an epic slideshow...at any IQ setting. Overall, it's a huge disappointment thus far. I foolishly pre-ordered the Xbox One version expecting the PC version would be all peaches and sunshine. Yet another example to add to the ever-growing list of reasons why pre-ordering games is bad.

Reply
Reply
Pages (2): 1 2 Next