F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Processing at a reduced pace than anticipated.

Processing at a reduced pace than anticipated.

Processing at a reduced pace than anticipated.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
H
HopiheEmi
Member
158
11-28-2016, 12:32 PM
#11
Deceptive marketing aside, I see it has 2x WAN ports, can OP provide dual uplink from a nearby router/modem and get 200Mbps out of it??? If he's got 1 ethernet ran to it already, might as well run a 2nd. Worth a shot lol Edit: I'm stupid, the receiving end will only spit out 100Mbps , return the dumb thing lol
H
HopiheEmi
11-28-2016, 12:32 PM #11

Deceptive marketing aside, I see it has 2x WAN ports, can OP provide dual uplink from a nearby router/modem and get 200Mbps out of it??? If he's got 1 ethernet ran to it already, might as well run a 2nd. Worth a shot lol Edit: I'm stupid, the receiving end will only spit out 100Mbps , return the dumb thing lol

T
tristangimp29
Member
55
11-29-2016, 01:00 AM
#12
Thank you all! Any suggestions for a DLAN device would be very helpful. Otherwise, thank you for your time and assistance.
T
tristangimp29
11-29-2016, 01:00 AM #12

Thank you all! Any suggestions for a DLAN device would be very helpful. Otherwise, thank you for your time and assistance.

A
addiblythe
Junior Member
17
11-30-2016, 09:29 PM
#13
It lacks WAN ports and only has LAN ports. I question its functionality—think it might just use a switch or limit itself to four pairs per port for 100Mbps at each end. Even when combined, it wouldn't reach 200Mbps; a single transfer would cap at 100Mbps, though two transfers could operate simultaneously at 100Mbps.
A
addiblythe
11-30-2016, 09:29 PM #13

It lacks WAN ports and only has LAN ports. I question its functionality—think it might just use a switch or limit itself to four pairs per port for 100Mbps at each end. Even when combined, it wouldn't reach 200Mbps; a single transfer would cap at 100Mbps, though two transfers could operate simultaneously at 100Mbps.

H
HitsLikeNoah_
Member
138
11-30-2016, 11:46 PM
#14
It won't affect the outcome; your speed will stay at 100Mbps per port no matter what you do.
H
HitsLikeNoah_
11-30-2016, 11:46 PM #14

It won't affect the outcome; your speed will stay at 100Mbps per port no matter what you do.

F
flycatcher9
Junior Member
47
12-05-2016, 03:50 PM
#15
Review the changes, I reached that conclusion almost as quickly as I formed the idea.
F
flycatcher9
12-05-2016, 03:50 PM #15

Review the changes, I reached that conclusion almost as quickly as I formed the idea.

N
Neidro
Senior Member
453
12-05-2016, 05:17 PM
#16
I thought the opposite end also had two ports linked together. But the result matches what I provided—it would practically support 2x 100Mbps (though the adapter wouldn’t handle LACP)—instead of merging to a single 200Mbps for one transfer. Usually not much benefit for the end device; better suited for switches and servers that need several high-speed connections from various devices.
N
Neidro
12-05-2016, 05:17 PM #16

I thought the opposite end also had two ports linked together. But the result matches what I provided—it would practically support 2x 100Mbps (though the adapter wouldn’t handle LACP)—instead of merging to a single 200Mbps for one transfer. Usually not much benefit for the end device; better suited for switches and servers that need several high-speed connections from various devices.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2