F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Patriot Viper Steel 4000-19 Samsung B-Die performance data Overclocking outcomes recorded

Patriot Viper Steel 4000-19 Samsung B-Die performance data Overclocking outcomes recorded

Patriot Viper Steel 4000-19 Samsung B-Die performance data Overclocking outcomes recorded

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
ChaTheBeast87
Member
68
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM
#1
Test System; MSI MPG B550 Gaming Plus AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @PBO +200 MHz CO -20 all cores Patriot Viper Steel 4000-19 2x8 Samsung B-Die TestMem5 1usmus_v3 config 10 Cycles no error. Prime95 Large FFTs no WHEA. Prime95 Small FFTs no WHEA. MemTes86 no errors. AIDA 64 51.2ns. These are the most precise numbers for my build. I have poor IMC, can't exceed 2000 FCLK; actually I can, but it requires a 1.25 SoC and I wouldn't choose it for regular use—it's not needed at 67 MHz and 33 FCLK. I achieved 51.2ns in AIDA64. That's sufficient for me. Wishing success to all who overclock. By the way, my CPU is overclocked to PBO2 +200 MHz and -20 CO for all cores.
C
ChaTheBeast87
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM #1

Test System; MSI MPG B550 Gaming Plus AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @PBO +200 MHz CO -20 all cores Patriot Viper Steel 4000-19 2x8 Samsung B-Die TestMem5 1usmus_v3 config 10 Cycles no error. Prime95 Large FFTs no WHEA. Prime95 Small FFTs no WHEA. MemTes86 no errors. AIDA 64 51.2ns. These are the most precise numbers for my build. I have poor IMC, can't exceed 2000 FCLK; actually I can, but it requires a 1.25 SoC and I wouldn't choose it for regular use—it's not needed at 67 MHz and 33 FCLK. I achieved 51.2ns in AIDA64. That's sufficient for me. Wishing success to all who overclock. By the way, my CPU is overclocked to PBO2 +200 MHz and -20 CO for all cores.

J
Jakeplusplus
Junior Member
3
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM
#2
Impressive outcomes from this setup. My current rig runs at 4000 16-16-16-32 1.45v on a 10850k board, but I would have preferred a gigabyte board for the t-topology. I plan to adjust all my OC settings once I upgrade to a proper case with a 360mm aio, which could make the Z490 gaming edge even more surprising.
J
Jakeplusplus
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM #2

Impressive outcomes from this setup. My current rig runs at 4000 16-16-16-32 1.45v on a 10850k board, but I would have preferred a gigabyte board for the t-topology. I plan to adjust all my OC settings once I upgrade to a proper case with a 360mm aio, which could make the Z490 gaming edge even more surprising.

D
Djefish
Member
184
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM
#3
You're almost there—just a bit more effort will get you past 50ns! Great work!
D
Djefish
03-19-2017, 10:55 PM #3

You're almost there—just a bit more effort will get you past 50ns! Great work!

E
EuropeanUnion
Senior Member
700
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#4
Providing the correct voltage works best for this chip. If temperatures stay below 60°C, it shouldn't be an issue. I shared a voltage setting of 1.57V using the stock LLC. You can also adjust the timings, as some—like tRCDRD, tRFC, tRC, and tCL—are sensitive to voltage changes. I can lower the tRFC value further, but it might not be ideal. A voltage of 295 is acceptable for me. Poor IMC can cause high ns Unluckiness, but overall I'm satisfied with 1967. By the way, your results are great!
E
EuropeanUnion
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #4

Providing the correct voltage works best for this chip. If temperatures stay below 60°C, it shouldn't be an issue. I shared a voltage setting of 1.57V using the stock LLC. You can also adjust the timings, as some—like tRCDRD, tRFC, tRC, and tCL—are sensitive to voltage changes. I can lower the tRFC value further, but it might not be ideal. A voltage of 295 is acceptable for me. Poor IMC can cause high ns Unluckiness, but overall I'm satisfied with 1967. By the way, your results are great!

J
Just_Andrep1p
Junior Member
17
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#5
No problem man! Thanks! The FCLK is not stable at that speed, errors start when I pass 2000 1:1. The memory was getting about 1.6v I think.
J
Just_Andrep1p
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #5

No problem man! Thanks! The FCLK is not stable at that speed, errors start when I pass 2000 1:1. The memory was getting about 1.6v I think.

R
RageRauken
Junior Member
42
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#6
I'm really struck by the 1967MHz FCLK. None of the Ryzen 5000 models I've tested reach more than 1900MHz without needing scaling adjustments. My 5900X, for instance, only runs about 26 seconds in Y Cruncher 1B at 3800MHz CL16-13-13-21 dual rank, but it climbs to over 5 minutes with a bit more relaxed timing. You're pretty lucky the CPU performs this way if it doesn't.
R
RageRauken
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #6

I'm really struck by the 1967MHz FCLK. None of the Ryzen 5000 models I've tested reach more than 1900MHz without needing scaling adjustments. My 5900X, for instance, only runs about 26 seconds in Y Cruncher 1B at 3800MHz CL16-13-13-21 dual rank, but it climbs to over 5 minutes with a bit more relaxed timing. You're pretty lucky the CPU performs this way if it doesn't.

O
OscarWoHA
Member
58
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#7
My 5900X becomes unreliable after passing 1900, whether dual or single rank. It shifts into a whea generator mode. Vsoc doesn't make a difference. My 5600 performs well up to 2K, but beyond that it also turns into a whea generator and isn't helpful.
O
OscarWoHA
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #7

My 5900X becomes unreliable after passing 1900, whether dual or single rank. It shifts into a whea generator mode. Vsoc doesn't make a difference. My 5600 performs well up to 2K, but beyond that it also turns into a whea generator and isn't helpful.

X
226
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#8
It seems this B-Die at 4000mhz on the CL14-14-14 platform should be achievable, especially on Intel's setup. The main issue with AMD is the Fclk cap; even their 5000 series aren't stable at that frequency, and my 2700X works at 3933mhz but not at 4000. There’s no solution for decoupling it either. A full B-Die can reach up to 4000mhz on CL12 or CL11, but my A2 single won’t. The 4200 CL16/17 actually gave better 3D scores.
X
X_Impossible_X
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #8

It seems this B-Die at 4000mhz on the CL14-14-14 platform should be achievable, especially on Intel's setup. The main issue with AMD is the Fclk cap; even their 5000 series aren't stable at that frequency, and my 2700X works at 3933mhz but not at 4000. There’s no solution for decoupling it either. A full B-Die can reach up to 4000mhz on CL12 or CL11, but my A2 single won’t. The 4200 CL16/17 actually gave better 3D scores.

F
FireWater26
Junior Member
14
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#9
They’ll go for a full 3600 at 12 bars, while my black and white designs refuse to include the C12 version.
F
FireWater26
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #9

They’ll go for a full 3600 at 12 bars, while my black and white designs refuse to include the C12 version.

N
natedog5476
Junior Member
32
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM
#10
I used tRCDRD to 14, but it posts inconsistently. It seems I need higher voltage for 14, possibly. The current voltage is 1.62V and it remains unstable. I lowered the voltage to 1.57V and it worked, but at 1.56V it becomes unstable again.
N
natedog5476
03-19-2017, 10:56 PM #10

I used tRCDRD to 14, but it posts inconsistently. It seems I need higher voltage for 14, possibly. The current voltage is 1.62V and it remains unstable. I lowered the voltage to 1.57V and it worked, but at 1.56V it becomes unstable again.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next