F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking an FX8350

Overclocking an FX8350

Overclocking an FX8350

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
LForLoser_
Member
79
12-17-2016, 01:44 PM
#1
Here are the details you requested. The information provided outlines the specifications of the system, including the processor, CPU fan, case, and motherboard. It also mentions the user's experience with overclocking and performance observations.
L
LForLoser_
12-17-2016, 01:44 PM #1

Here are the details you requested. The information provided outlines the specifications of the system, including the processor, CPU fan, case, and motherboard. It also mentions the user's experience with overclocking and performance observations.

J
jaefrh
Member
180
12-17-2016, 10:28 PM
#2
Bad motherboard for overclocking. The power phase design is subpar (4+1). It's suitable only for running the 8350 at stock or turbo settings.
J
jaefrh
12-17-2016, 10:28 PM #2

Bad motherboard for overclocking. The power phase design is subpar (4+1). It's suitable only for running the 8350 at stock or turbo settings.

P
ProSkipperz
Member
129
12-20-2016, 02:38 PM
#3
Bad motherboard for overclocking. The power phase design is subpar (4+1). It's suitable only for running the 8350 at stock or turbo settings.
P
ProSkipperz
12-20-2016, 02:38 PM #3

Bad motherboard for overclocking. The power phase design is subpar (4+1). It's suitable only for running the 8350 at stock or turbo settings.

R
RigbyPT
Member
99
12-20-2016, 04:29 PM
#4
That's what I thought. Appreciate the explanation.
R
RigbyPT
12-20-2016, 04:29 PM #4

That's what I thought. Appreciate the explanation.

K
Kacper_Bored
Senior Member
389
12-20-2016, 07:42 PM
#5
I own the same motherboard but with a rev 1.0; the older version works fine for overclocking, though not ideal. Most M5A97 boards have poor LLLoad line calibration (overvoltage), so I disable it. Turn off all energy-saving features and try overclocking the CPU cooler—currently I'm at 4.5ghz with 1.475 volts, which is quite high compared to other overclocks. Since load line calibration isn't possible, I increase the voltage a bit for better performance, allowing my CPU to reach 45c and using a Noctua NHD14 cooler.
K
Kacper_Bored
12-20-2016, 07:42 PM #5

I own the same motherboard but with a rev 1.0; the older version works fine for overclocking, though not ideal. Most M5A97 boards have poor LLLoad line calibration (overvoltage), so I disable it. Turn off all energy-saving features and try overclocking the CPU cooler—currently I'm at 4.5ghz with 1.475 volts, which is quite high compared to other overclocks. Since load line calibration isn't possible, I increase the voltage a bit for better performance, allowing my CPU to reach 45c and using a Noctua NHD14 cooler.

S
skugry
Junior Member
15
12-22-2016, 10:50 AM
#6
I'll need to try that out later. I'm using a similar Zalman cooler on my system and seeing the speeds as described before.
I'm planning to disable the load line, thanks for the suggestion.
Another thought—does the Noctua really justify the higher cost? I was considering switching from an Antec 900 to a Silverstone Raven RV03 for better heat dissipation at the top, and to avoid overheating the PSU with a future 370 xfire configuration. In my mind, the Zalman would be preferable since it lets you position the CPU fan to direct airflow upward with the other fans.
S
skugry
12-22-2016, 10:50 AM #6

I'll need to try that out later. I'm using a similar Zalman cooler on my system and seeing the speeds as described before.
I'm planning to disable the load line, thanks for the suggestion.
Another thought—does the Noctua really justify the higher cost? I was considering switching from an Antec 900 to a Silverstone Raven RV03 for better heat dissipation at the top, and to avoid overheating the PSU with a future 370 xfire configuration. In my mind, the Zalman would be preferable since it lets you position the CPU fan to direct airflow upward with the other fans.

A
AlsoCookie
Member
124
12-28-2016, 04:48 PM
#7
I had a zalman 9900aled, it couldn't manage the chip with overclocking. It was hitting g 70c on the socket and 60c on the CPU, which are the limits for these chips. Now with this noctua cooler, I'm achieving the temperatures I mentioned earlier. I'm currently running an Intel burn test and I'm hitting 50c on the socket, which is actually lower than I expected.
So yes, noctua is worth it. I managed to get one in used condition.
A
AlsoCookie
12-28-2016, 04:48 PM #7

I had a zalman 9900aled, it couldn't manage the chip with overclocking. It was hitting g 70c on the socket and 60c on the CPU, which are the limits for these chips. Now with this noctua cooler, I'm achieving the temperatures I mentioned earlier. I'm currently running an Intel burn test and I'm hitting 50c on the socket, which is actually lower than I expected.
So yes, noctua is worth it. I managed to get one in used condition.

T
tensaimicky
Member
214
01-06-2017, 12:20 PM
#8
Regarding the air direction, I used a cooler 212evo and it didn't make any change whether I blew air out the side or straight up.
T
tensaimicky
01-06-2017, 12:20 PM #8

Regarding the air direction, I used a cooler 212evo and it didn't make any change whether I blew air out the side or straight up.

D
DerpUniverse
Member
203
01-06-2017, 06:20 PM
#9
Well, we'll find out what remains after improving my case/CPU and adding another GPU.
Maybe I'll get one, but it's uncertain. I'd need to try the new configuration first to determine if it's necessary. I'd prefer to keep what works and reuse it. This system has been performing well for four years now.
D
DerpUniverse
01-06-2017, 06:20 PM #9

Well, we'll find out what remains after improving my case/CPU and adding another GPU.
Maybe I'll get one, but it's uncertain. I'd need to try the new configuration first to determine if it's necessary. I'd prefer to keep what works and reuse it. This system has been performing well for four years now.

H
horrie
Member
71
01-06-2017, 07:31 PM
#10
It really depends on your needs and how much you want to hide it. If you're a beginner, just keep it simple. I tend to push my hardware to its limits. My motherboard is already supporting this CPU overclock, so it should work fine.
H
horrie
01-06-2017, 07:31 PM #10

It really depends on your needs and how much you want to hide it. If you're a beginner, just keep it simple. I tend to push my hardware to its limits. My motherboard is already supporting this CPU overclock, so it should work fine.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next