F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocked i3 3220

Overclocked i3 3220

Overclocked i3 3220

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
F
FanvonLOGO
Member
61
10-06-2016, 11:42 AM
#11
Mug3r:
Curious, Windows isn't adjusting the update my BIOS confirms as 4.02 on the CPU, yet Windows claims it's running at 3.30.
Windows typically doesn't interpret real clock values; a 3.3 GHz figure is just part of the CPU's name in its view.
F
FanvonLOGO
10-06-2016, 11:42 AM #11

Mug3r:
Curious, Windows isn't adjusting the update my BIOS confirms as 4.02 on the CPU, yet Windows claims it's running at 3.30.
Windows typically doesn't interpret real clock values; a 3.3 GHz figure is just part of the CPU's name in its view.

G
GamerBlu
Member
63
10-23-2016, 02:10 AM
#12
Sakkura:
Mug3r:
Curious, Windows isn't detecting the update my BIOS confirms as 4.02 on the CPU, yet Windows claims it's running at 3.30.
Windows typically doesn't interpret the real clock speeds; a 3.3 GHz is just part of the CPU's name in its view.
However, when I look in HW Monitor, it also lists the maximum as 3292 MHz.
G
GamerBlu
10-23-2016, 02:10 AM #12

Sakkura:
Mug3r:
Curious, Windows isn't detecting the update my BIOS confirms as 4.02 on the CPU, yet Windows claims it's running at 3.30.
Windows typically doesn't interpret the real clock speeds; a 3.3 GHz is just part of the CPU's name in its view.
However, when I look in HW Monitor, it also lists the maximum as 3292 MHz.

L
lilycotterill
Senior Member
656
10-25-2016, 12:49 AM
#13
I believe I should keep it running for about three hours, using a mix of activities like chrome browsing, word processing, video playback, a few cinebench sessions, and light gaming. I'll share the outcomes later. 😊
L
lilycotterill
10-25-2016, 12:49 AM #13

I believe I should keep it running for about three hours, using a mix of activities like chrome browsing, word processing, video playback, a few cinebench sessions, and light gaming. I'll share the outcomes later. 😊

D
Drennix
Junior Member
11
10-26-2016, 12:30 AM
#14
Check cpuz.
D
Drennix
10-26-2016, 12:30 AM #14

Check cpuz.

R
Redstoner137
Posting Freak
811
10-26-2016, 08:35 AM
#15
Checking the cpuz is necessary. I'm not sure what I missed initially, maybe just too accustomed to using HW for everything. Alright here goes.
R
Redstoner137
10-26-2016, 08:35 AM #15

Checking the cpuz is necessary. I'm not sure what I missed initially, maybe just too accustomed to using HW for everything. Alright here goes.

K
KIRO_HD
Member
216
10-27-2016, 12:40 PM
#16
Update: During Cinebench the CPU surged to a maximum of 107C, which seems like a strong indication to stop the project and return to my i5 6600k. This model is intended for overclocking and comes with a solid cooler. I'm a bit let down though, as I was looking forward to testing how far I could push a budget system. Fun's over packed it up.

In summary, I guess even though there was some success at the end, it’s not worth it to experiment with a budget CPU—especially since this only worked because it’s winter here and I’ve lowered the room temperature to 20C while keeping both side panels off.
K
KIRO_HD
10-27-2016, 12:40 PM #16

Update: During Cinebench the CPU surged to a maximum of 107C, which seems like a strong indication to stop the project and return to my i5 6600k. This model is intended for overclocking and comes with a solid cooler. I'm a bit let down though, as I was looking forward to testing how far I could push a budget system. Fun's over packed it up.

In summary, I guess even though there was some success at the end, it’s not worth it to experiment with a budget CPU—especially since this only worked because it’s winter here and I’ve lowered the room temperature to 20C while keeping both side panels off.

A
avi15
Member
167
11-04-2016, 02:57 AM
#17
Certainly, it's clear you're not making a mistake. Being at 121 bclk would have been unfeasible when others were struggling to reach 105.
A
avi15
11-04-2016, 02:57 AM #17

Certainly, it's clear you're not making a mistake. Being at 121 bclk would have been unfeasible when others were struggling to reach 105.

R
RamseyMC
Member
70
11-05-2016, 10:32 PM
#18
That was my consideration, you mentioned GPU and storage subsystem problems after 105-106. Also, three hours of light usage wouldn't be worthwhile; three hours of prime time marks the beginning of a solid test.
R
RamseyMC
11-05-2016, 10:32 PM #18

That was my consideration, you mentioned GPU and storage subsystem problems after 105-106. Also, three hours of light usage wouldn't be worthwhile; three hours of prime time marks the beginning of a solid test.

R
ripa5000
Posting Freak
884
11-06-2016, 03:52 PM
#19
You're definitely not overclocking. It would have been impossible to reach 121 bclk when everyone else is struggling to hit 105. I think there might have been some safety limits in place, bringing it down to 100, even though the BIOS showed 121 as the active setting and I noticed temperature increases during operation.
R
ripa5000
11-06-2016, 03:52 PM #19

You're definitely not overclocking. It would have been impossible to reach 121 bclk when everyone else is struggling to hit 105. I think there might have been some safety limits in place, bringing it down to 100, even though the BIOS showed 121 as the active setting and I noticed temperature increases during operation.

F
FamusLuna
Member
202
11-06-2016, 05:27 PM
#20
Some mobos will let you change settings but it actually doesn't do anything because it's locked. There is no reason temps should have even changed when nothing changed. You are still at stock speed.
F
FamusLuna
11-06-2016, 05:27 PM #20

Some mobos will let you change settings but it actually doesn't do anything because it's locked. There is no reason temps should have even changed when nothing changed. You are still at stock speed.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next