Outperforms 3900x by 9700k
Outperforms 3900x by 9700k
the top budget gaming CPU right now seems to be a R5 3600 or i5-9400(f) priced around the same cost in the US—about $170—while still providing solid editing capabilities for a hobbyist setup. You won’t need to pick the 3300X unless you’re focused solely on gaming, as that model is likely the best option until Intel releases a strong competitor for the 10th generation. Saving money by opting for a cheaper CPU could let you upgrade your graphics by a couple of tiers and even more if you choose a budget motherboard. You might be able to cover an extra $250 to move from an 1660S to a 2070S edit, assuming you buy now.
They assert a 9100f outperforms a 2700x. Avoid them if possible. For details: the links provided reference recent CPU benchmark discussions.
I’m planning to purchase my next month’s budget around $1,100 to $1,200, excluding storage, PSU, case, and cooling. That means the main focus will be on the CPU, motherboard, RAM, and GPU. I intend to keep this machine for a while and want it to be easily upgradable in the future. This is why I’m considering the new 10th generation and 4000 series sockets. However, since I live in Israel, $1,200 isn’t that expensive. I mainly edit with many effects, mostly at 1080p or 1440p at 60fps, and I need smooth performance to maintain quality. Currently, my i3 3550 struggles with 60fps even when overclocked, making it hard to edit smoothly.
I believe even a six-core processor can make a big difference. My main gaming and workstation PCs have six or twelve cores, and my mobile station does too. I’d have chosen eight cores if it made sense back then or was available at all. Ryzen is truly the top option for both gaming and productivity on the same setup.