F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Optimal components for each Windows update.

Optimal components for each Windows update.

Optimal components for each Windows update.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
Charoonia
Member
134
07-03-2016, 01:39 PM
#1
Basically, this is an attempt to look at the major releases of Windows and determine the exact right hardware that each version of Windows will run the very best on. Some versions of Windows may technically support more powerful hardware, but you shouldn't need the most powerful hardware possible (except in certain cases). This is hardware that can support everything that runs on a particular version of Windows well enough for the vast majority of Windows enthusiasts. Also, this won't cover every Windows version, I will get to other notable versions after going over the main 9/10 versions of Windows. So I will first start with these 8 versions: Windows 1.0 (MS-DOS 3.2) Windows 2.0 (MS-DOS 3.3) Windows 3.0 (MS-DOS 5.0) Windows 95 Windows 2000 Windows Vista Windows 7 Windows 8 Because of the fact that some versions of Windows run equally as well as previous versions, there are only really going to be 5 computers (at first). Also, because having a bunch of computers takes up too much space, the first three versions of Windows will be done with 86box. 86box is able to emulate various IBM PCs from 1981 all the way to an Intel Pentium II/AMD K6-2 running at 266 MHz. Anything faster than that cannot be accomplished by any emulator or hypervisor software. VMware actually can run Windows 2000 acceptably, but we are still looking for something better than acceptable, so that is why I created this thread.
C
Charoonia
07-03-2016, 01:39 PM #1

Basically, this is an attempt to look at the major releases of Windows and determine the exact right hardware that each version of Windows will run the very best on. Some versions of Windows may technically support more powerful hardware, but you shouldn't need the most powerful hardware possible (except in certain cases). This is hardware that can support everything that runs on a particular version of Windows well enough for the vast majority of Windows enthusiasts. Also, this won't cover every Windows version, I will get to other notable versions after going over the main 9/10 versions of Windows. So I will first start with these 8 versions: Windows 1.0 (MS-DOS 3.2) Windows 2.0 (MS-DOS 3.3) Windows 3.0 (MS-DOS 5.0) Windows 95 Windows 2000 Windows Vista Windows 7 Windows 8 Because of the fact that some versions of Windows run equally as well as previous versions, there are only really going to be 5 computers (at first). Also, because having a bunch of computers takes up too much space, the first three versions of Windows will be done with 86box. 86box is able to emulate various IBM PCs from 1981 all the way to an Intel Pentium II/AMD K6-2 running at 266 MHz. Anything faster than that cannot be accomplished by any emulator or hypervisor software. VMware actually can run Windows 2000 acceptably, but we are still looking for something better than acceptable, so that is why I created this thread.

J
jmoorse
Member
62
07-03-2016, 06:22 PM
#2
Many overlook Windows NT 4.0, which is a disappointment because it was the top Windows before XP.
J
jmoorse
07-03-2016, 06:22 PM #2

Many overlook Windows NT 4.0, which is a disappointment because it was the top Windows before XP.

K
Koreje
Junior Member
44
07-10-2016, 01:37 AM
#3
For this setup, the ideal components included a motherboard like the [ACC 2168] clone or the [SiS 310] ASUS ISA-386C. The processor was an [PGA-132] AMD Am386DX running at 25 MHz, paired with a separate 387 FPU unit. The graphics card used IBM VGA ISA, functioning as a basic display adapter without acceleration for advanced graphics. RAM was limited to 4 MB, while the storage relied on IDE drives connected via an ISA16 controller. A 31/32 MB hard drive was necessary because MS-DOS versions 3.2 and 3.3 required 32 MB partitions, which caused issues with larger drives. The system also featured a modest 4 MB of RAM, far exceeding typical needs since most programs operated within 640 KB. Some older DOS programs might have needed to operate under the 2 MB limit.
K
Koreje
07-10-2016, 01:37 AM #3

For this setup, the ideal components included a motherboard like the [ACC 2168] clone or the [SiS 310] ASUS ISA-386C. The processor was an [PGA-132] AMD Am386DX running at 25 MHz, paired with a separate 387 FPU unit. The graphics card used IBM VGA ISA, functioning as a basic display adapter without acceleration for advanced graphics. RAM was limited to 4 MB, while the storage relied on IDE drives connected via an ISA16 controller. A 31/32 MB hard drive was necessary because MS-DOS versions 3.2 and 3.3 required 32 MB partitions, which caused issues with larger drives. The system also featured a modest 4 MB of RAM, far exceeding typical needs since most programs operated within 640 KB. Some older DOS programs might have needed to operate under the 2 MB limit.

F
funniegame1
Member
192
07-11-2016, 09:11 PM
#4
I remember it. It wasn<|pad|>, just not the main version. I’ll eventually outline the equipment needed to support it.
F
funniegame1
07-11-2016, 09:11 PM #4

I remember it. It wasn<|pad|>, just not the main version. I’ll eventually outline the equipment needed to support it.

G
gavin0099
Member
179
07-31-2016, 07:53 PM
#5
Best hardware for Windows 3.0: Motherboard model [i420ZX], CPU socket 3, AMD Enhanced Am486DX2 running at 66 MHz, GPU using ISA adapter Tseng Labs ET4000AX (only for display, no real graphics boost), 16 MB RAM, sound card Creative Labs Sound Blaster Pro 2, storage includes a 2 GB IDE hard drive plus two floppy drives and a 64X CD-ROM drive for software installation and Windows setup. I added multimedia extensions for extra features. With a more powerful CPU, the ISA display would become a limiting factor. This setup would still work well for DOS gaming PCs.
G
gavin0099
07-31-2016, 07:53 PM #5

Best hardware for Windows 3.0: Motherboard model [i420ZX], CPU socket 3, AMD Enhanced Am486DX2 running at 66 MHz, GPU using ISA adapter Tseng Labs ET4000AX (only for display, no real graphics boost), 16 MB RAM, sound card Creative Labs Sound Blaster Pro 2, storage includes a 2 GB IDE hard drive plus two floppy drives and a 64X CD-ROM drive for software installation and Windows setup. I added multimedia extensions for extra features. With a more powerful CPU, the ISA display would become a limiting factor. This setup would still work well for DOS gaming PCs.

K
Kytzis
Member
183
08-02-2016, 10:40 AM
#6
I understand I mentioned hardware for the eight Windows versions I talked about earlier, but since Windows 95 through Windows 8 need real hardware and I’m waiting to purchase more components, I ask for your patience. In the meantime, I’ll focus on creating the best hardware guides for other Windows versions that can run in emulators.
K
Kytzis
08-02-2016, 10:40 AM #6

I understand I mentioned hardware for the eight Windows versions I talked about earlier, but since Windows 95 through Windows 8 need real hardware and I’m waiting to purchase more components, I ask for your patience. In the meantime, I’ll focus on creating the best hardware guides for other Windows versions that can run in emulators.

S
Setiii
Junior Member
45
08-02-2016, 12:32 PM
#7
Top hardware options for Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8: Motherboard model [Z68], CPU [LGA 1155], Intel Core i7-3770K, GPU choice between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (budget-friendly) or AMD Radeon HD 7970 (better DirectX 11 support). RAM available in 16 GB DDR3-1066. Sound card options include Asus Xonar DX or built-in HD audio. Storage setup features a 2 TB SATA SSD with optional SATA optical drive. Performance remains solid for most games as of mid-2023. Note: Vista won’t boot on Haswell or newer chipsets; this system supports all major titles. Updated August 26, 2023 by Smithfield
S
Setiii
08-02-2016, 12:32 PM #7

Top hardware options for Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8: Motherboard model [Z68], CPU [LGA 1155], Intel Core i7-3770K, GPU choice between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (budget-friendly) or AMD Radeon HD 7970 (better DirectX 11 support). RAM available in 16 GB DDR3-1066. Sound card options include Asus Xonar DX or built-in HD audio. Storage setup features a 2 TB SATA SSD with optional SATA optical drive. Performance remains solid for most games as of mid-2023. Note: Vista won’t boot on Haswell or newer chipsets; this system supports all major titles. Updated August 26, 2023 by Smithfield

B
bonbon317
Junior Member
31
08-03-2016, 09:28 AM
#8
Optimal components for Windows 95 OSR2: Motherboard model [AMD-760], CPU [Socket A] AMD Athlon XP 2000 or superior, Graphics card [AGP 4X] NVIDIA GeForce 4 Ti 4600, RAM 512 MB DDR, Sound card [PCI] Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live!, Storage options include 2 GB IDE hard drive with support for 16/32/64 GB drives, or an IDE CD burner. You’ll need high-density 3.5" and 5.25" floppy drives or a disk emulator, along with an IDE CD burner. This setup is limited by Windows 95’s outdated capabilities—especially its lack of AGP support, which makes the GeForce 4 Ti unusable. While newer hardware exists that can run Windows 95, it won’t significantly improve performance. A 2 GB hard drive is necessary because Windows 95 doesn’t support FAT32. The next version, Windows 95 OSR2, does include FAT32 support, but it’s a separate release and not compatible with Windows 95. This system would be suitable for running games like Half-Life, though overall performance remains constrained. The platform itself is quite outdated, with Windows 95 being considered poor and later versions like Windows Classic 4.x offering little improvement. The only viable alternatives are Windows 2000 and its derivatives, such as NT 3.51, OS/2 Warp 4, or other niche releases.
B
bonbon317
08-03-2016, 09:28 AM #8

Optimal components for Windows 95 OSR2: Motherboard model [AMD-760], CPU [Socket A] AMD Athlon XP 2000 or superior, Graphics card [AGP 4X] NVIDIA GeForce 4 Ti 4600, RAM 512 MB DDR, Sound card [PCI] Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live!, Storage options include 2 GB IDE hard drive with support for 16/32/64 GB drives, or an IDE CD burner. You’ll need high-density 3.5" and 5.25" floppy drives or a disk emulator, along with an IDE CD burner. This setup is limited by Windows 95’s outdated capabilities—especially its lack of AGP support, which makes the GeForce 4 Ti unusable. While newer hardware exists that can run Windows 95, it won’t significantly improve performance. A 2 GB hard drive is necessary because Windows 95 doesn’t support FAT32. The next version, Windows 95 OSR2, does include FAT32 support, but it’s a separate release and not compatible with Windows 95. This system would be suitable for running games like Half-Life, though overall performance remains constrained. The platform itself is quite outdated, with Windows 95 being considered poor and later versions like Windows Classic 4.x offering little improvement. The only viable alternatives are Windows 2000 and its derivatives, such as NT 3.51, OS/2 Warp 4, or other niche releases.

M
MinerJC_66
Member
106
08-03-2016, 11:52 AM
#9
Top components for Windows 2000: Motherboard models such as [X48] Asus Rampage Formula or [P45] GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P. CPU options include [LGA 775] Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6500K (with unlocked multiplier) or [LGA 775] Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 (more affordable, greater cache, higher stock speed). Handle these processors with care, as improper use might affect your health. GPU choice: [PCI Express Gen II] ATI Radeon HD 4870 (needs unofficial drivers). RAM: 2 GB DDR3-1066. Sound card: Basic onboard audio suffices for this version. Storage: Both boards support IDE (PATA); use it if available, otherwise switch to SATA. Initially the system disk is limited to 127 GB, but you can expand it via registry changes and partition resizing. Maximum storage is 2 TB. This setup supports any workload compatible with Windows NT 5.x. Drivers for newer graphics cards like the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX will be difficult to find, but unified shaders could improve performance in some titles. The ATI Radeon HD 4870 is likely a DirectX 10 card, though Windows 2000 only recognizes DirectX 9. Some sellers may include a CPU with these boards, so check compatibility before purchasing. Avoid buying a CPU unless necessary, as installation carries health risks. This configuration is adequate for most tasks and meets basic requirements.
M
MinerJC_66
08-03-2016, 11:52 AM #9

Top components for Windows 2000: Motherboard models such as [X48] Asus Rampage Formula or [P45] GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P. CPU options include [LGA 775] Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6500K (with unlocked multiplier) or [LGA 775] Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 (more affordable, greater cache, higher stock speed). Handle these processors with care, as improper use might affect your health. GPU choice: [PCI Express Gen II] ATI Radeon HD 4870 (needs unofficial drivers). RAM: 2 GB DDR3-1066. Sound card: Basic onboard audio suffices for this version. Storage: Both boards support IDE (PATA); use it if available, otherwise switch to SATA. Initially the system disk is limited to 127 GB, but you can expand it via registry changes and partition resizing. Maximum storage is 2 TB. This setup supports any workload compatible with Windows NT 5.x. Drivers for newer graphics cards like the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX will be difficult to find, but unified shaders could improve performance in some titles. The ATI Radeon HD 4870 is likely a DirectX 10 card, though Windows 2000 only recognizes DirectX 9. Some sellers may include a CPU with these boards, so check compatibility before purchasing. Avoid buying a CPU unless necessary, as installation carries health risks. This configuration is adequate for most tasks and meets basic requirements.

S
SK_Blyat
Junior Member
17
08-07-2016, 05:36 PM
#10
Alternative components for Windows 2000 (to bypass driver and mutation problems): Use identical motherboard(s). CPU: [LGA 775] Intel Celeron 450 GPU: [PCI Express Gen I] PS3 RSX (NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX) (×2, enabling SLI). RAM: 1 or 2 GB DDR2 or DDR3. Sound card: Built-in audio functions are sufficient. Storage: 128 GB IDE (PATA) drive. This setup guarantees full compatibility with Windows 2000. SLI is implemented to compensate for the GPU(s) lacking separate vertex and pixel shaders. The single-core Celeron is designed to be safe for physical contact without requiring special precautions.
S
SK_Blyat
08-07-2016, 05:36 PM #10

Alternative components for Windows 2000 (to bypass driver and mutation problems): Use identical motherboard(s). CPU: [LGA 775] Intel Celeron 450 GPU: [PCI Express Gen I] PS3 RSX (NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX) (×2, enabling SLI). RAM: 1 or 2 GB DDR2 or DDR3. Sound card: Built-in audio functions are sufficient. Storage: 128 GB IDE (PATA) drive. This setup guarantees full compatibility with Windows 2000. SLI is implemented to compensate for the GPU(s) lacking separate vertex and pixel shaders. The single-core Celeron is designed to be safe for physical contact without requiring special precautions.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next