F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming my gpu usage doesn't want to reach near 100% in certain games

my gpu usage doesn't want to reach near 100% in certain games

my gpu usage doesn't want to reach near 100% in certain games

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
1
1234qaz12qaz
Posting Freak
773
08-18-2016, 05:19 AM
#11
The program isn't visible in the uninstall section of your control panel, which means it might not be listed there.
1
1234qaz12qaz
08-18-2016, 05:19 AM #11

The program isn't visible in the uninstall section of your control panel, which means it might not be listed there.

X
Xtrezze
Junior Member
2
08-26-2016, 07:51 AM
#12
CPU usage staying below 100% with no core reaching 100% still doesn't confirm full CPU capacity. Windows scheduler usually distributes tasks across cores to manage heat, even for identical jobs. For instance, this is how my processor behavior appears during a 4-thread Cinebench test on a Ryzen 5600X runs.

Notably, the Ryzen informs Windows about its preferred cores, which the scheduler attempts to utilize. The core marked at 100% is one of those preferred ones. If other logical processors were busy, it would suggest this isn't a true 4-thread benchmark.

The game's overall design also plays a role. Certain titles only require 4-5 active threads, and the CPU limit could be higher if GPU compilation tasks run on a single thread.
X
Xtrezze
08-26-2016, 07:51 AM #12

CPU usage staying below 100% with no core reaching 100% still doesn't confirm full CPU capacity. Windows scheduler usually distributes tasks across cores to manage heat, even for identical jobs. For instance, this is how my processor behavior appears during a 4-thread Cinebench test on a Ryzen 5600X runs.

Notably, the Ryzen informs Windows about its preferred cores, which the scheduler attempts to utilize. The core marked at 100% is one of those preferred ones. If other logical processors were busy, it would suggest this isn't a true 4-thread benchmark.

The game's overall design also plays a role. Certain titles only require 4-5 active threads, and the CPU limit could be higher if GPU compilation tasks run on a single thread.

N
NorthwestSun
Member
202
08-26-2016, 02:25 PM
#13
The processor isn't reaching the boost frequency. Are you using a cooler? What temperatures are being recorded during high load?
Install RAM in slots a2-b2 and turn on XMP in the BIOS settings.
N
NorthwestSun
08-26-2016, 02:25 PM #13

The processor isn't reaching the boost frequency. Are you using a cooler? What temperatures are being recorded during high load?
Install RAM in slots a2-b2 and turn on XMP in the BIOS settings.

F
Fabista
Member
175
08-26-2016, 07:23 PM
#14
there is just two slots in my motherboard and it just supports till 2666mhz on i5 so there is no xmp setting in bios
and I'm using the stock cooler and the CPU temps are very good
F
Fabista
08-26-2016, 07:23 PM #14

there is just two slots in my motherboard and it just supports till 2666mhz on i5 so there is no xmp setting in bios
and I'm using the stock cooler and the CPU temps are very good

L
Lucilu123
Junior Member
47
08-26-2016, 09:31 PM
#15
The article discusses the Intel Core i5-10400F review available at the provided link.
L
Lucilu123
08-26-2016, 09:31 PM #15

The article discusses the Intel Core i5-10400F review available at the provided link.

M
Mor7e
Junior Member
46
08-26-2016, 10:39 PM
#16
A person must inform Intel about this matter.
M
Mor7e
08-26-2016, 10:39 PM #16

A person must inform Intel about this matter.

S
Spikeddragon
Junior Member
7
08-27-2016, 04:30 AM
#17
It has been this way for a long time: Intel promoting the single-core turbos for their CPUs, with frequencies adjusting based on core usage being an obvious point of discussion.
Therefore, users rarely experience those single-core improvements since the operating system constantly handles other tasks.
Intel's claimed boost might be just that—cake—unless you're using a K or X CPU.
S
Spikeddragon
08-27-2016, 04:30 AM #17

It has been this way for a long time: Intel promoting the single-core turbos for their CPUs, with frequencies adjusting based on core usage being an obvious point of discussion.
Therefore, users rarely experience those single-core improvements since the operating system constantly handles other tasks.
Intel's claimed boost might be just that—cake—unless you're using a K or X CPU.

B
Brudora
Senior Member
726
08-27-2016, 04:59 AM
#18
Ohhhh... I see.
B
Brudora
08-27-2016, 04:59 AM #18

Ohhhh... I see.

M
MyPreZBro
Member
131
08-27-2016, 07:07 AM
#19
Turbo boost represents a marketer's ideal because there are numerous subtle aspects that often go unnoticed. The two key points are:

Turbo boost isn't a guaranteed feature
Intel even mentions this in their footnotes:
Turbo boost is the highest frequency a component can reach. It doesn't imply it will actually achieve it.
In fact, turbo boosting seems to be the point where companies are giving up and saying yes, people will overclock their parts. So why not handle it for them? And apply it selectively.
M
MyPreZBro
08-27-2016, 07:07 AM #19

Turbo boost represents a marketer's ideal because there are numerous subtle aspects that often go unnoticed. The two key points are:

Turbo boost isn't a guaranteed feature
Intel even mentions this in their footnotes:
Turbo boost is the highest frequency a component can reach. It doesn't imply it will actually achieve it.
In fact, turbo boosting seems to be the point where companies are giving up and saying yes, people will overclock their parts. So why not handle it for them? And apply it selectively.

B
Broflash
Senior Member
740
08-27-2016, 03:52 PM
#20
It's completely okay to run benchmarks or stress tests, but when I played Minecraft the same way, I got around 30% usage with about 100 FPS, which wasn't smooth. I don't know why that happened.
B
Broflash
08-27-2016, 03:52 PM #20

It's completely okay to run benchmarks or stress tests, but when I played Minecraft the same way, I got around 30% usage with about 100 FPS, which wasn't smooth. I don't know why that happened.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next