Issues with RAM failing to reach maximum performance settings.

F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Issues with RAM failing to reach maximum performance settings.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next

Nobo_HD
Member

08-21-2019, 12:22 PM

#11

Failed attempt, proceeding with 3417MHz.

Nobo_HD

08-21-2019, 12:22 PM #11

Failed attempt, proceeding with 3417MHz.

Pugy101
Junior Member

08-21-2019, 01:50 PM

#12

It could be the IMC not handling them all at 3600 seconds. Either way, the gap between 3400 and 3600 isn't really noticeable.

Pugy101

08-21-2019, 01:50 PM #12

It could be the IMC not handling them all at 3600 seconds. Either way, the gap between 3400 and 3600 isn't really noticeable.

Fergy04
Member

152

09-11-2019, 07:38 AM

#13

The IMC is currently running on the CPU. Upgrading to an i9 should improve performance, but timing matters—consider testing before your planned installation.

Fergy04

09-11-2019, 07:38 AM #13

The IMC is currently running on the CPU. Upgrading to an i9 should improve performance, but timing matters—consider testing before your planned installation.

xenjohn
Junior Member

09-17-2019, 08:11 PM

#14

Usually the IMCs on Intel CPUs perform well and can manage high frequencies, though the i9 might benefit from an upgraded IMC. The integrated memory controller is also worth mentioning.

xenjohn

09-17-2019, 08:11 PM #14

Usually the IMCs on Intel CPUs perform well and can manage high frequencies, though the i9 might benefit from an upgraded IMC. The integrated memory controller is also worth mentioning.

Fenitis
Member

196

09-22-2019, 02:00 AM

#15

It seems like you're considering a specific approach now. Intel likely didn't anticipate many systems using high-speed RAM with a locked CPU.

Fenitis

09-22-2019, 02:00 AM #15

It seems like you're considering a specific approach now. Intel likely didn't anticipate many systems using high-speed RAM with a locked CPU.

AquaTrees123
Junior Member

09-22-2019, 03:31 AM

#16

Not sure about the lock status, but the IMC remains good. The gap between 3400 and 3600 isn't significant, so you're not missing much.

AquaTrees123

09-22-2019, 03:31 AM #16

Not sure about the lock status, but the IMC remains good. The gap between 3400 and 3600 isn't significant, so you're not missing much.

YellowDevs
Member

170

09-22-2019, 07:01 AM

#17

It doesn’t affect 2 DIMMs in slot 1 or 3, and IMC doesn’t determine the slot location. That’s more about RAM arrangement than slot type.

YellowDevs

09-22-2019, 07:01 AM #17

It doesn’t affect 2 DIMMs in slot 1 or 3, and IMC doesn’t determine the slot location. That’s more about RAM arrangement than slot type.

Koollojoe
Posting Freak

830

09-27-2019, 08:26 AM

#18

I'm referring to operating four dimmers simultaneously at a speed of 3600.

Koollojoe

09-27-2019, 08:26 AM #18

I'm referring to operating four dimmers simultaneously at a speed of 3600.

diamondswordjo
Junior Member

09-28-2019, 01:49 AM

#19

Yes, but if slots 1 and 3 don’t work with 3600, a CPU change likely won’t make much difference unless a better IMC can help reduce the issue.

diamondswordjo

09-28-2019, 01:49 AM #19

Yes, but if slots 1 and 3 don’t work with 3600, a CPU change likely won’t make much difference unless a better IMC can help reduce the issue.

Xephtor
Member

192

09-29-2019, 02:36 PM

#20

it is always kind of recommended to put the ram in slot 2 and 4 since generally, a lot of boards use daisy chain. but again, OP is running 4 dimms not 2.

Xephtor

09-29-2019, 02:36 PM #20

it is always kind of recommended to put the ram in slot 2 and 4 since generally, a lot of boards use daisy chain. but again, OP is running 4 dimms not 2.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next