F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Issues with overclocking Ryzen 3 1200 processor

Issues with overclocking Ryzen 3 1200 processor

Issues with overclocking Ryzen 3 1200 processor

B
Brandon_En
Member
246
03-29-2017, 01:29 PM
#1
OK so i chose to boost my Ryzen 3 1200 to 3.9 GHZ at 1.3875 Volts, thinking that might help. After downloading the Ryzen CPU image for Blender and rendering it, I opened my startup performance tool. Then something strange occurred—like it halts at around 1.37 GHz instead of reaching 3.9 GHz at all. I found an image showing this problem. When I tested it in Prime95, the same issue appeared again. I’m confused about what’s causing it and wonder if a higher voltage might be necessary.
B
Brandon_En
03-29-2017, 01:29 PM #1

OK so i chose to boost my Ryzen 3 1200 to 3.9 GHZ at 1.3875 Volts, thinking that might help. After downloading the Ryzen CPU image for Blender and rendering it, I opened my startup performance tool. Then something strange occurred—like it halts at around 1.37 GHz instead of reaching 3.9 GHz at all. I found an image showing this problem. When I tested it in Prime95, the same issue appeared again. I’m confused about what’s causing it and wonder if a higher voltage might be necessary.

K
kirby620
Member
60
03-29-2017, 07:18 PM
#2
Don't rely solely on Windows for this task; often it struggles with OC. Consider using HW Info or Ryzen Master instead.
K
kirby620
03-29-2017, 07:18 PM #2

Don't rely solely on Windows for this task; often it struggles with OC. Consider using HW Info or Ryzen Master instead.

N
NickiMinajjj
Junior Member
39
04-05-2017, 12:21 PM
#3
I just checked my setup to compare it with Windows, and noticed the readings vary a lot—between 3.33 and 3.79 for the 3.8GHz model. In contrast, HWMonitor shows a clear main difference of about 3.791. When I click Stress CPU in cpuz or run Prime95, my CPU usage jumps to 100%, while yours only shows 35%.
N
NickiMinajjj
04-05-2017, 12:21 PM #3

I just checked my setup to compare it with Windows, and noticed the readings vary a lot—between 3.33 and 3.79 for the 3.8GHz model. In contrast, HWMonitor shows a clear main difference of about 3.791. When I click Stress CPU in cpuz or run Prime95, my CPU usage jumps to 100%, while yours only shows 35%.

G
Generel_Autism
Junior Member
22
04-06-2017, 08:15 AM
#4
I checked my setup to compare it with Windows and found that Windows fluctuates between 3.33 and 3.79, whereas HWMonitor shows a consistent 3.791 difference. When I click Stress CPU in cpuz or run Prime95, the CPU usage jumps directly to 100%, while mine only shows 35%. Do you know why?
G
Generel_Autism
04-06-2017, 08:15 AM #4

I checked my setup to compare it with Windows and found that Windows fluctuates between 3.33 and 3.79, whereas HWMonitor shows a consistent 3.791 difference. When I click Stress CPU in cpuz or run Prime95, the CPU usage jumps directly to 100%, while mine only shows 35%. Do you know why?

K
Kikibug223
Member
144
04-06-2017, 10:35 AM
#5
MXGamer80 asked simon12 to compare their setup, noting discrepancies between software readings and hardware monitoring tools.
K
Kikibug223
04-06-2017, 10:35 AM #5

MXGamer80 asked simon12 to compare their setup, noting discrepancies between software readings and hardware monitoring tools.

A
AstroZone
Member
136
04-06-2017, 04:37 PM
#6
Did you review the advanced settings within your power-saving plan in Windows?
A
AstroZone
04-06-2017, 04:37 PM #6

Did you review the advanced settings within your power-saving plan in Windows?