F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Issues with AMD FX 9590 on Gigabyte GA-990X model

Issues with AMD FX 9590 on Gigabyte GA-990X model

Issues with AMD FX 9590 on Gigabyte GA-990X model

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
L
lunas3
Member
54
10-10-2016, 03:41 PM
#11
The only reliable information comes from the manufacturer's official page. If it isn't available there and doesn't apply, it may be incorrect or outdated. Everyone else seems mistaken, or you might have searched incorrectly. It could support some 220W CPUs, but not all—verify with the exact model for accuracy.
L
lunas3
10-10-2016, 03:41 PM #11

The only reliable information comes from the manufacturer's official page. If it isn't available there and doesn't apply, it may be incorrect or outdated. Everyone else seems mistaken, or you might have searched incorrectly. It could support some 220W CPUs, but not all—verify with the exact model for accuracy.

W
WildCandy
Senior Member
675
10-13-2016, 02:23 AM
#12
Support was the only request made. Seeing the screenshot highlights the reason for concern. Appreciate your assistance.
W
WildCandy
10-13-2016, 02:23 AM #12

Support was the only request made. Seeing the screenshot highlights the reason for concern. Appreciate your assistance.

C
chenglee1998
Member
147
10-19-2016, 02:46 PM
#13
The difference between marketing and reality is clear. Official backing isn't present, which means some Amazon reviews may not be fully reliable.
C
chenglee1998
10-19-2016, 02:46 PM #13

The difference between marketing and reality is clear. Official backing isn't present, which means some Amazon reviews may not be fully reliable.

J
jkgaga15
Member
234
10-19-2016, 09:34 PM
#14
That's what I thought, unfortunately. Alright, I'll purchase the 8350 and trade in the 9590. All set.
J
jkgaga15
10-19-2016, 09:34 PM #14

That's what I thought, unfortunately. Alright, I'll purchase the 8350 and trade in the 9590. All set.

H
Hitscher
Member
203
10-20-2016, 02:35 AM
#15
I wouldn't. It's better to buy an Athlon 200GE and it will perform much better in everything. The FX8350 is just not great right now. You can't play many games smoothly at 60fps no matter the settings, it always stutters and feels pretty bad.
H
Hitscher
10-20-2016, 02:35 AM #15

I wouldn't. It's better to buy an Athlon 200GE and it will perform much better in everything. The FX8350 is just not great right now. You can't play many games smoothly at 60fps no matter the settings, it always stutters and feels pretty bad.

G
glenroi
Member
164
10-20-2016, 05:03 AM
#16
The board lacks a VRM package suitable for the processor. Options include Crosshair Formula Z or Sabortooth Rev 2. For those who prefer Gigabyte, the 990FX UD7 is recommended. I owned all three models.
G
glenroi
10-20-2016, 05:03 AM #16

The board lacks a VRM package suitable for the processor. Options include Crosshair Formula Z or Sabortooth Rev 2. For those who prefer Gigabyte, the 990FX UD7 is recommended. I owned all three models.

M
mumustrak
Senior Member
729
10-21-2016, 05:16 PM
#17
200ge is indeed AM4, right? I’m thinking about sticking with AM3 or maybe jumping into another chip and a new motherboard. The GB-990x was just a better replacement for the old Crosshair, so I won’t waste more on something outdated. I plan to sell the 9590 and buy the 8350. Maybe that profit will cover a beer. Cheers!
M
mumustrak
10-21-2016, 05:16 PM #17

200ge is indeed AM4, right? I’m thinking about sticking with AM3 or maybe jumping into another chip and a new motherboard. The GB-990x was just a better replacement for the old Crosshair, so I won’t waste more on something outdated. I plan to sell the 9590 and buy the 8350. Maybe that profit will cover a beer. Cheers!

I
Idg1000shatz
Member
215
10-21-2016, 06:30 PM
#18
This model features an impressive chip that performs well overall, especially when compared to lower-end variants. The non-E chips tend to have solid timing, though they run slightly slower than the higher-end versions.
I
Idg1000shatz
10-21-2016, 06:30 PM #18

This model features an impressive chip that performs well overall, especially when compared to lower-end variants. The non-E chips tend to have solid timing, though they run slightly slower than the higher-end versions.

E
ExplicitSavage
Junior Member
14
10-29-2016, 05:55 AM
#19
It’s smarter to sell the gigabyte instead of investing in an outdated system. Performance has dropped so much that you can’t climb higher without buying a new board and CPU right away.
E
ExplicitSavage
10-29-2016, 05:55 AM #19

It’s smarter to sell the gigabyte instead of investing in an outdated system. Performance has dropped so much that you can’t climb higher without buying a new board and CPU right away.

V
vikkiii
Member
182
10-31-2016, 12:27 AM
#20
Reviewed Gigabyte's website and found the 9370 and 9590 models not listed as supported. GA-990X-Gaming SLI (rev. 1.0) Support | Motherboard - GIGABYTE U.S.A. The chips rated at 125W are highlighted, with the top performer being the FX-8370. This is because the 9370 and 9590 use 225W components. The motherboard's VRM performs adequately but falls short of meeting the requirements for a 225W chip. Gigabyte previously faced problems with their UD lineup and opted not to include 225W options. While FX boards generally support them, few models do so reliably. The Asus 990FX chipped boards are dependable, as confirmed by personal experience. I own a Sabertooth 2.0, 3.0 (new), CHV and CHV-Z, which all work well with any FX chip. Unless you're just experimenting or have no alternatives, consider upgrading to AM4-based hardware. If not, an 8370 or lower wattage chip would be preferable, as the 9370 and 9590 generate excessive heat and require a high-quality cooler—ideally water-cooled—for stable operation.
V
vikkiii
10-31-2016, 12:27 AM #20

Reviewed Gigabyte's website and found the 9370 and 9590 models not listed as supported. GA-990X-Gaming SLI (rev. 1.0) Support | Motherboard - GIGABYTE U.S.A. The chips rated at 125W are highlighted, with the top performer being the FX-8370. This is because the 9370 and 9590 use 225W components. The motherboard's VRM performs adequately but falls short of meeting the requirements for a 225W chip. Gigabyte previously faced problems with their UD lineup and opted not to include 225W options. While FX boards generally support them, few models do so reliably. The Asus 990FX chipped boards are dependable, as confirmed by personal experience. I own a Sabertooth 2.0, 3.0 (new), CHV and CHV-Z, which all work well with any FX chip. Unless you're just experimenting or have no alternatives, consider upgrading to AM4-based hardware. If not, an 8370 or lower wattage chip would be preferable, as the 9370 and 9590 generate excessive heat and require a high-quality cooler—ideally water-cooled—for stable operation.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next