I don't play games due to optimization issues like FPS lock or crashes.
I don't play games due to optimization issues like FPS lock or crashes.
It worked perfectly on my 8150, usually outperforming the i5 4670 (non K) my cousin used. After damaging my 8150 and adding an 8350, the game no longer runs smoothly at all. I've tried numerous fixes to get it back online.
These are titles I haven't installed on my machine. From what I've heard, I don't think I need to pay for them. Some people criticize Assassin's Creed: Blade, but it seems to perform well and looks great even on my neighbor's R9 280 with the FX-8350 CPU. No lag at all. However, that might just be my experience—it could run poorly on certain systems... On the same setup I noticed COD ghosts working smoothly despite a high frame rate, while another machine handled Crysis 3 and Shadows of Mordor without any issues.
I've tried a few games that aren't very optimized, but they're still enjoyable. It's taught me to invest in better-optimized titles.
I usually avoid games that aren't well optimized. I got Watch Dogs for free, but its performance is really poor. I guess I'm just not interested in the story or gameplay. I was excited about Lords of the Fallen, but I've heard there are many technical problems with it. I'll have to wait a bit.
BattleField 4 claims to have 11 hours, but that seems too short for a game at my level—only 2 hours should count with my 7107 XP. Probably shouldn't have purchased it when it launched. I won’t buy Hardline either; I’ll just revisit Bad Company 2: Vietnam instead.