F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming I don't play Fallout 4.

I don't play Fallout 4.

I don't play Fallout 4.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
P
Peliah
Junior Member
12
01-28-2016, 10:58 AM
#1
I recently assembled my new machine and it should handle most recent titles smoothly. I saved my graphics drivers and other files, but Fallout 4 and NVIDIA GeForce Experience both indicate I can't meet the basic requirements. Required Specs: OS: Windows 7/8/10 (64-bit needed) Processor: Intel Core i5-2300 2.8 GHz / AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0 GHz or similar RAM: 8 GB Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti 2GB / AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB or similar Storage: 30 GB free space My setup: OS: Windows 10 64-bit Processor: AMD X4 860k 3.7GHz RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti 2GB I don’t understand why it says I can’t run it, while sites like http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyr...12905/?p=a suggest otherwise. I truly value your assistance.
P
Peliah
01-28-2016, 10:58 AM #1

I recently assembled my new machine and it should handle most recent titles smoothly. I saved my graphics drivers and other files, but Fallout 4 and NVIDIA GeForce Experience both indicate I can't meet the basic requirements. Required Specs: OS: Windows 7/8/10 (64-bit needed) Processor: Intel Core i5-2300 2.8 GHz / AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0 GHz or similar RAM: 8 GB Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti 2GB / AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB or similar Storage: 30 GB free space My setup: OS: Windows 10 64-bit Processor: AMD X4 860k 3.7GHz RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti 2GB I don’t understand why it says I can’t run it, while sites like http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyr...12905/?p=a suggest otherwise. I truly value your assistance.

S
SKELETONEMPIRE
Junior Member
7
01-30-2016, 09:35 PM
#2
Run refers to the act of playing or operating the game. For this title, it would likely run smoothly on a 750ti with Med-High settings at around 60 frames per second in 1080p resolution. The graphics performance is expected to be average, and the processor might not be very strong.
S
SKELETONEMPIRE
01-30-2016, 09:35 PM #2

Run refers to the act of playing or operating the game. For this title, it would likely run smoothly on a 750ti with Med-High settings at around 60 frames per second in 1080p resolution. The graphics performance is expected to be average, and the processor might not be very strong.

M
MikeBenj
Member
209
02-02-2016, 12:13 PM
#3
You're able to play the game. Consider all these elements, but you can skip them. My friend used a low-end LGA 1150 processor and a 750ti, yet managed smooth performance at medium/high settings in 900p.
M
MikeBenj
02-02-2016, 12:13 PM #3

You're able to play the game. Consider all these elements, but you can skip them. My friend used a low-end LGA 1150 processor and a 750ti, yet managed smooth performance at medium/high settings in 900p.

_
_Lolikc_
Member
184
02-02-2016, 08:59 PM
#4
it's running just one level above the lowest spec, which isn't great
_
_Lolikc_
02-02-2016, 08:59 PM #4

it's running just one level above the lowest spec, which isn't great

L
lantilio
Junior Member
26
02-03-2016, 04:16 AM
#5
Fallout 4 behaves oddly; its frame rate seems tied straight to the amount of objects present. That means higher numbers give better performance, not less. You might notice smooth gameplay at 60 fps with reasonable settings, but inside certain areas—especially the starting house and vault—even basic settings struggle to hit that number or feel like it. Don’t be misled into thinking you can handle it; this is my message.
L
lantilio
02-03-2016, 04:16 AM #5

Fallout 4 behaves oddly; its frame rate seems tied straight to the amount of objects present. That means higher numbers give better performance, not less. You might notice smooth gameplay at 60 fps with reasonable settings, but inside certain areas—especially the starting house and vault—even basic settings struggle to hit that number or feel like it. Don’t be misled into thinking you can handle it; this is my message.

K
kefkef5000
Member
102
02-05-2016, 04:07 AM
#6
This performance is poor, especially at lower configurations, with around 15-20 FPS.
K
kefkef5000
02-05-2016, 04:07 AM #6

This performance is poor, especially at lower configurations, with around 15-20 FPS.

B
Blockwalker02
Member
181
02-05-2016, 07:37 AM
#7
I tested it myself, strolling through the sanctuary. It maintained 15-20 frames per second on reduced settings. My ASUS ROG G750JW notebook handled the game perfectly with a modded med and 765m graphics.
B
Blockwalker02
02-05-2016, 07:37 AM #7

I tested it myself, strolling through the sanctuary. It maintained 15-20 frames per second on reduced settings. My ASUS ROG G750JW notebook handled the game perfectly with a modded med and 765m graphics.

K
kirbeetx
Junior Member
4
02-12-2016, 07:12 PM
#8
I was moving quickly in the sanctuary at reduced performance, using my X-01 jetpack from a saved game on an old gaming laptop that ran 15-20 frames per second.
K
kirbeetx
02-12-2016, 07:12 PM #8

I was moving quickly in the sanctuary at reduced performance, using my X-01 jetpack from a saved game on an old gaming laptop that ran 15-20 frames per second.

R
Rubicube59
Member
192
02-20-2016, 04:18 PM
#9
I've noticed this CPU is praised for its excellent value in the budget category.
R
Rubicube59
02-20-2016, 04:18 PM #9

I've noticed this CPU is praised for its excellent value in the budget category.

D
Deneth_
Member
175
02-25-2016, 02:53 AM
#10
Sure, let me take a look. I'll run a diagnostic using Afterburner to confirm all systems are properly configured.
D
Deneth_
02-25-2016, 02:53 AM #10

Sure, let me take a look. I'll run a diagnostic using Afterburner to confirm all systems are properly configured.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next