I can assist you with your upgrade. Please let me know what specific help you need.
I can assist you with your upgrade. Please let me know what specific help you need.
@NZgamer with AC: The Odyssey reaches its peak, delivering about 40-50 FPS on average. With varied configurations, I typically see around 60 FPS.
You shouldn't upgrade for no reason. Assassin's Creed Odyssey isn't worth it. Ubisoft struggles with PC optimization, and these games have always been problematic. PCgamer evaluated the performance of Odyssey on various GPUs at 1080p ultra, using an i9 9900k! That’s a huge amount of power! The RTX 2080ti, costing around $1000, is failing in this test—averaging just 86 FPS and dropping to 62 with a 3% drop. Even with $1500 invested in CPU and GPU, it still falls short. https://www.pcgamer.com/performance-guid...d-odyssey/ The truth is, a Ryzen 1600AF can maintain 60 FPS in most games if the graphics card isn’t limiting it. Whether you're on 1080p, 1440p, or 4K, unless you’re aiming for 120 FPS, upgrading isn’t necessary. Game developers seem to be prioritizing ease over efficiency. Skyrim (with mods) performed well in 4K at a lower resolution, while Call of Duty Warzone struggles with massive textures even on older GPUs. Skyrim’s original version was a 6GB game; the remastered one is 22GB, but it runs more smoothly thanks to 64-bit support and more RAM. Most current titles exceed 50GB in size. It seems developers are neglecting optimization.
The 3200g represents a much weaker CPU compared to the 1600AF when you take overclocking into account. It’s a 4-core, 4-thread processor built using the 12nm process. The 1600AF, on the other hand, is a 6-core, 12-thread model also based on the 12nm process (the AF version uses 12nm, while the original was 14nm). Both share the same manufacturing process, so their performance per clock cycle and actual speed are the same at identical frequencies. The 3200g starts at 3.6 GHz with a turbo of 4 GHz, whereas the 1600AF has a lower base of 3.2 GHz and a turbo of 3.6 GHz. Nonetheless, overclocking brings them very close in relative terms. Binning effects might slightly favor the 3200g, but the difference is minimal. Running a 1600AF at 4.0 GHz versus a 4.1 GHz 3200g still leaves the 1600AF ahead. The 1600AF is essentially a low-cost option. It would likely sell for around $120 given its performance, whereas AMD’s Ryzen 3600 offers double the price and better results after overclocking.