High-speed connection available, though it doesn't reach full gigabit capacity.
High-speed connection available, though it doesn't reach full gigabit capacity.
I would examine the PC settings to confirm the interface type—gigabit or 100M—and verify the cable’s claims. Checking the router’s specifications shows those back ports support 10/100/1000, which aligns with a 1G connection. That suggests the issue lies elsewhere.
How are you testing download speed? It's also quite possible that the server you're downloading from doesn't supply more than 100 Mbps to a single client.
You're seeing a reading above 100 in your Wi-Fi speed test, which might not be accurate.
alright it says 100mbps is there any way to make it show up as 1000mbps the motherboard specs says it can be 1000
The apparent speed reflects the negotiated rate between the computer's NIC and its connection. You might link the machine to another device or laptop. If the result is 1000 Mbps, the motherboard and cable are likely fine. The probable issue lies with the router. Consider what model you have—such as a FritzBox—and note that its LAN ports may be in an "energy save" mode, capping speeds at 100 Mbps instead of 1000 Mbps. It's also possible the router doesn't support higher speeds and would need an upgrade. ~edit: I've attached a screenshot of your router's network settings; check for similar details. Spoiler alert~
Tomahawk supports gigabit wired Ethernet, but lacks Wi-Fi. If you have Wi-Fi, it's handled via a separate card. Which one are we talking about?
@Jharring0701 the laptop has gigabit Ethernet too so it could be used to test the cable. a way to test the actual cox router exists with the laptop as well. If the cable tests as gigabit, run it to the Cox router and see if it gets gigabit too. Im still suspecting Cox.
He provides the router model in the discussion, specifically the Technicolor-CGM4141. After reviewing it, it appears this router can handle 1G on its two LAN ports, which likely means a configuration setting allows speeds up to 100Mb/s as you noted.