F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking FX 6300 Over clocking Troubble

FX 6300 Over clocking Troubble

FX 6300 Over clocking Troubble

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
A
Abruhcadabra
Junior Member
10
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#11
The situation doesn't seem to be missing anything for me. I understand that the motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but a 4.6-4.7Ghz should still be achievable on a decent CPU.
It's not really ethical to return a working CPU or motherboard that functions properly at the original specifications. But ultimately, it's up to you what you decide. Overclocking is often seen as a bonus, like winning the lottery—it's something she chooses to do sometimes and other times not.
A
Abruhcadabra
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #11

The situation doesn't seem to be missing anything for me. I understand that the motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but a 4.6-4.7Ghz should still be achievable on a decent CPU.
It's not really ethical to return a working CPU or motherboard that functions properly at the original specifications. But ultimately, it's up to you what you decide. Overclocking is often seen as a bonus, like winning the lottery—it's something she chooses to do sometimes and other times not.

B
Bocamadman
Member
58
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#12
utroz :
Matt_matrix :
utroz
Seems like you're not missing anything, mate. I know the motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but 4.6-4.7Ghz should still work on a decent CPU.
-_- RMA; Rinse and repeat then...
It's not really the right thing to return a CPU or motherboard that functions perfectly with the original settings. But personal preference is everything. Overclocking is just another perk, like winning the lottery—it's something she does sometimes and other times not.
I don't care about ethics when it comes to my gear; focus on price versus performance, and if it means saving a few hundred dollars from big companies, that's fine.
B
Bocamadman
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #12

utroz :
Matt_matrix :
utroz
Seems like you're not missing anything, mate. I know the motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but 4.6-4.7Ghz should still work on a decent CPU.
-_- RMA; Rinse and repeat then...
It's not really the right thing to return a CPU or motherboard that functions perfectly with the original settings. But personal preference is everything. Overclocking is just another perk, like winning the lottery—it's something she does sometimes and other times not.
I don't care about ethics when it comes to my gear; focus on price versus performance, and if it means saving a few hundred dollars from big companies, that's fine.

M
Malv3ir0_
Member
207
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#13
Matt_matrix :
utroz :
Matt_matrix :
utroz :
It doesn't look like you're missing anything. I understand that a motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but 4.6-4.7Ghz should still be achievable on a decent CPU.
-_- RMA; Rinse and repeat then...
It's not very ethical to return a CPU or motherboard that functions perfectly under stock settings, especially when it was sold for. But personal preferences matter. Overclocking is just another perk, like winning the lottery—it's something she chooses, sometimes, sometimes not.
I don't care about ethics regarding my hardware. I'm not worried about abortion, weather, feeding children in Somalia, or buying everyone Bugatti Veyrons. My priority is maximizing price-to-performance, and if that means spending a few hundred dollars from a big company's pocket, I'm fine with it...
Most people don't share that view.
M
Malv3ir0_
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #13

Matt_matrix :
utroz :
Matt_matrix :
utroz :
It doesn't look like you're missing anything. I understand that a motherboard isn't ideal for overclocking, but 4.6-4.7Ghz should still be achievable on a decent CPU.
-_- RMA; Rinse and repeat then...
It's not very ethical to return a CPU or motherboard that functions perfectly under stock settings, especially when it was sold for. But personal preferences matter. Overclocking is just another perk, like winning the lottery—it's something she chooses, sometimes, sometimes not.
I don't care about ethics regarding my hardware. I'm not worried about abortion, weather, feeding children in Somalia, or buying everyone Bugatti Veyrons. My priority is maximizing price-to-performance, and if that means spending a few hundred dollars from a big company's pocket, I'm fine with it...
Most people don't share that view.

B
BritishPing
Member
105
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#14
Before attempting an RMA, consider resetting the CMOS and starting fresh. This is especially important given your recent overclocking attempts, which may have altered settings and led to problems. You might also try removing the lithium battery from the motherboard (while unplugged) for a short time, then reinstalling it and rebooting. After loading the BIOS, everything should return to its original configuration. Disable all power-saving features, set the Vcore to manual, and gradually increase the multiplier while adjusting the Vcore as needed. After each 100Mhz overclock, verify with Prime 95 (or similar) for 15 minutes; if successful, increase the multiplier, otherwise adjust the Vcore. Your initial 100Mhz test should use the standard voltage, not begin by changing it drastically.
B
BritishPing
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #14

Before attempting an RMA, consider resetting the CMOS and starting fresh. This is especially important given your recent overclocking attempts, which may have altered settings and led to problems. You might also try removing the lithium battery from the motherboard (while unplugged) for a short time, then reinstalling it and rebooting. After loading the BIOS, everything should return to its original configuration. Disable all power-saving features, set the Vcore to manual, and gradually increase the multiplier while adjusting the Vcore as needed. After each 100Mhz overclock, verify with Prime 95 (or similar) for 15 minutes; if successful, increase the multiplier, otherwise adjust the Vcore. Your initial 100Mhz test should use the standard voltage, not begin by changing it drastically.

S
Suthurnbel
Member
182
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#15
Before attempting an RMA, consider resetting the CMOS and starting fresh. This is especially important given your recent overclocking attempts, which may have altered settings and caused problems. You might also try removing the lithium battery from the motherboard (while unplugged) for a short time, then reinstalling it and rebooting. After loading the BIOS, everything should return to its original configuration. Disabling power-saving features is recommended—set the Vcore to manual, adjust the multiplier slowly, and fine-tune the Vcore. After each 100Mhz overclock, verify with Prime95 (or similar) for 15 minutes; if successful, increase the multiplier, otherwise adjust the Vcore. Your first 100Mhz overclock should start at the standard voltage, not immediately increasing it. Thanks for your patience; I’ll try the steps you suggested and let you know how it goes.
S
Suthurnbel
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #15

Before attempting an RMA, consider resetting the CMOS and starting fresh. This is especially important given your recent overclocking attempts, which may have altered settings and caused problems. You might also try removing the lithium battery from the motherboard (while unplugged) for a short time, then reinstalling it and rebooting. After loading the BIOS, everything should return to its original configuration. Disabling power-saving features is recommended—set the Vcore to manual, adjust the multiplier slowly, and fine-tune the Vcore. After each 100Mhz overclock, verify with Prime95 (or similar) for 15 minutes; if successful, increase the multiplier, otherwise adjust the Vcore. Your first 100Mhz overclock should start at the standard voltage, not immediately increasing it. Thanks for your patience; I’ll try the steps you suggested and let you know how it goes.

B
Blazer444
Member
146
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#16
Well, it's not just lack of skill, overclocking can be tricky. Even experienced users sometimes make errors. My system once ran at 4.7Ghz for more than two months because a small, forgotten setting was off. I only noticed it when I had to check the BIOS. Once I fixed it, I could push 5.05Ghz @ 1.46V (with the multiplier and FSB) and my top overclock reached 5.5Ghz @ 1.55V. My usual 5.05Ghz is fine, but keeping it at 1.55V all day isn't safe. It's easy to mess up with just one wrong setting. If you haven't checked yet, look at the guide posted for the FX 8350 and Asus board—it covers similar points.
B
Blazer444
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #16

Well, it's not just lack of skill, overclocking can be tricky. Even experienced users sometimes make errors. My system once ran at 4.7Ghz for more than two months because a small, forgotten setting was off. I only noticed it when I had to check the BIOS. Once I fixed it, I could push 5.05Ghz @ 1.46V (with the multiplier and FSB) and my top overclock reached 5.5Ghz @ 1.55V. My usual 5.05Ghz is fine, but keeping it at 1.55V all day isn't safe. It's easy to mess up with just one wrong setting. If you haven't checked yet, look at the guide posted for the FX 8350 and Asus board—it covers similar points.

J
JosephGamez
Member
141
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#17
Redneck5439 shared their experience with overclocking, emphasizing that even experienced users can make mistakes due to minor oversights. They recall a situation where a small setting error kept their system stuck at 4.7Ghz for months, only resolving it after a critical moment in BIOS. They highlighted the importance of double-checking settings and suggest reading a guide for better guidance. The post also mentions tips for an FX 8350 with an Asus motherboard, though most settings remain similar.

They detailed a process starting from scratch, avoiding power-saving features, and gradually increasing voltage to reach 3.9Ghz before needing further adjustments. After stabilizing at stock voltage, they experimented with higher speeds and voltages, eventually hitting a ceiling around 4.2Ghz. They noted that changing voltage too much caused instability, and even with adjustments, crashes occurred within a minute.

Additionally, they observed that the boost voltage increased to 1.452V under high clock settings, supporting their concerns. They also checked the impact of enabling High Performance Computing mode and CPU Unlock in UEFI, confirming no interference.
J
JosephGamez
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #17

Redneck5439 shared their experience with overclocking, emphasizing that even experienced users can make mistakes due to minor oversights. They recall a situation where a small setting error kept their system stuck at 4.7Ghz for months, only resolving it after a critical moment in BIOS. They highlighted the importance of double-checking settings and suggest reading a guide for better guidance. The post also mentions tips for an FX 8350 with an Asus motherboard, though most settings remain similar.

They detailed a process starting from scratch, avoiding power-saving features, and gradually increasing voltage to reach 3.9Ghz before needing further adjustments. After stabilizing at stock voltage, they experimented with higher speeds and voltages, eventually hitting a ceiling around 4.2Ghz. They noted that changing voltage too much caused instability, and even with adjustments, crashes occurred within a minute.

Additionally, they observed that the boost voltage increased to 1.452V under high clock settings, supporting their concerns. They also checked the impact of enabling High Performance Computing mode and CPU Unlock in UEFI, confirming no interference.

N
Nex_Play
Junior Member
20
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#18
Every chip faces that overclocking challenge you're dealing with. It requires only a minimal amount of Vcore to achieve the extra speed, but once you surpass that point, increasing voltage becomes necessary with each additional megahertz. Your current performance peaks around 4Ghz, and maintaining stability at 3.9Ghz is quite impressive, though pushing beyond that will demand higher voltages. An FX chip typically supports a Vcore up to 1.55V, but for safety I’d limit it to around 1.5V. I observed with my FX 8370 that at 1.55V and 5.5Ghz, the voltage would rise to 1.6V under load—something that pushed my cooling limits and made me uncomfortable. You can attempt to push your processor to 4.3Ghz at 1.5V, but I wouldn’t exceed that threshold under stress, as voltage spikes near 1.55V would be problematic. Most FX processors can comfortably overclock within the 800Mhz to 1.2Ghz range, which is considered normal overclocking. Your chip may not be in the top tier, but if you manage temperatures well, you might still reach that 800Mhz level at around 4.3Ghz with 1.5V. It’s often referred to as the "silicon lottery" because results vary widely.
N
Nex_Play
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #18

Every chip faces that overclocking challenge you're dealing with. It requires only a minimal amount of Vcore to achieve the extra speed, but once you surpass that point, increasing voltage becomes necessary with each additional megahertz. Your current performance peaks around 4Ghz, and maintaining stability at 3.9Ghz is quite impressive, though pushing beyond that will demand higher voltages. An FX chip typically supports a Vcore up to 1.55V, but for safety I’d limit it to around 1.5V. I observed with my FX 8370 that at 1.55V and 5.5Ghz, the voltage would rise to 1.6V under load—something that pushed my cooling limits and made me uncomfortable. You can attempt to push your processor to 4.3Ghz at 1.5V, but I wouldn’t exceed that threshold under stress, as voltage spikes near 1.55V would be problematic. Most FX processors can comfortably overclock within the 800Mhz to 1.2Ghz range, which is considered normal overclocking. Your chip may not be in the top tier, but if you manage temperatures well, you might still reach that 800Mhz level at around 4.3Ghz with 1.5V. It’s often referred to as the "silicon lottery" because results vary widely.

G
Guardz
Member
115
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#19
Redneck5439 shares observations about the increasing difficulty of overclocking certain chips. The processor struggles to maintain stability as voltage requirements rise with frequency. At higher speeds, the chip tends to require more voltage, making it harder to sustain performance. Some FX chips can handle voltages up to 1.55V, but it’s generally safer to stay below 1.5V. Experiences with the FX 8370 show voltage spikes when pushing beyond 4Ghz, even with good cooling. Trying to reach 4.3Ghz at 1.5V can be risky, as it often leads to instability. Most overclockers aim for the 800Mhz–1.2Ghz range, where processors are considered reliable. The process is often described as a "silicon lottery" because results vary widely.
G
Guardz
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #19

Redneck5439 shares observations about the increasing difficulty of overclocking certain chips. The processor struggles to maintain stability as voltage requirements rise with frequency. At higher speeds, the chip tends to require more voltage, making it harder to sustain performance. Some FX chips can handle voltages up to 1.55V, but it’s generally safer to stay below 1.5V. Experiences with the FX 8370 show voltage spikes when pushing beyond 4Ghz, even with good cooling. Trying to reach 4.3Ghz at 1.5V can be risky, as it often leads to instability. Most overclockers aim for the 800Mhz–1.2Ghz range, where processors are considered reliable. The process is often described as a "silicon lottery" because results vary widely.

M
MettaloCaft
Senior Member
396
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM
#20
as you mentioned, sometimes desired clocks can be achieved; however, it's not possible within the OS without using software, though it's far from what I would normally do with BIOS settings. Here are some images before I close the thread.
M
MettaloCaft
03-19-2024, 01:23 PM #20

as you mentioned, sometimes desired clocks can be achieved; however, it's not possible within the OS without using software, though it's far from what I would normally do with BIOS settings. Here are some images before I close the thread.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next