F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming FPS using SEUS Minecraft shaders version 1.7.2

FPS using SEUS Minecraft shaders version 1.7.2

FPS using SEUS Minecraft shaders version 1.7.2

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
malouou
Junior Member
16
11-15-2016, 09:55 PM
#1
I set up some shaders for Minecraft using my R9 290, thinking it could manage the load. However, my local game runs around 40 FPS, which is below what I hoped for, especially compared to my friend's 90 FPS on a GTX 760 with shaders. After installing OptiFine at full settings and adjusting the view distance, the texture pack still helped but didn't fully resolve the issue. I'm playing with a 64x MC-enhanced pack and have pictures of my configuration and frame rates. Am I getting the performance I expected from MC shaders? It's unclear since I haven't used them before.
M
malouou
11-15-2016, 09:55 PM #1

I set up some shaders for Minecraft using my R9 290, thinking it could manage the load. However, my local game runs around 40 FPS, which is below what I hoped for, especially compared to my friend's 90 FPS on a GTX 760 with shaders. After installing OptiFine at full settings and adjusting the view distance, the texture pack still helped but didn't fully resolve the issue. I'm playing with a 64x MC-enhanced pack and have pictures of my configuration and frame rates. Am I getting the performance I expected from MC shaders? It's unclear since I haven't used them before.

V
VitoSEXY
Posting Freak
797
11-16-2016, 09:04 AM
#2
V
VitoSEXY
11-16-2016, 09:04 AM #2

T
THEKAIST
Junior Member
33
11-23-2016, 01:27 PM
#3
Yes, Vsync is active.
T
THEKAIST
11-23-2016, 01:27 PM #3

Yes, Vsync is active.

S
Shadoox
Member
62
11-24-2016, 04:26 PM
#4
It isn't like that; the settings are adjusted to disable VSync.
S
Shadoox
11-24-2016, 04:26 PM #4

It isn't like that; the settings are adjusted to disable VSync.

G
GamerPix
Member
63
11-24-2016, 06:36 PM
#5
VSync needs to be disabled as well, which is why you're using OptiFine. It tends to slow things down on systems that can handle the full settings, but that's what I anticipated with shaders.
G
GamerPix
11-24-2016, 06:36 PM #5

VSync needs to be disabled as well, which is why you're using OptiFine. It tends to slow things down on systems that can handle the full settings, but that's what I anticipated with shaders.

D
DistrictGamer
Junior Member
7
11-28-2016, 02:28 PM
#6
The developers mentioned issues with AMD cards since they can't properly test them. I attempted to install them on my GTX 645 and reached maximum performance at 30, which suggests the R9 290 should handle more than that.
D
DistrictGamer
11-28-2016, 02:28 PM #6

The developers mentioned issues with AMD cards since they can't properly test them. I attempted to install them on my GTX 645 and reached maximum performance at 30, which suggests the R9 290 should handle more than that.

D
diyu_
Member
123
11-29-2016, 01:04 AM
#7
He should be performing better, though the problem lies with AMD graphics cards. Optifine improves frame stability and enhances shader performance significantly.
D
diyu_
11-29-2016, 01:04 AM #7

He should be performing better, though the problem lies with AMD graphics cards. Optifine improves frame stability and enhances shader performance significantly.

O
OKNK
Member
231
11-29-2016, 07:40 AM
#8
I’ll experiment with adjusting certain parameters and then share the results. Lowering some options increased FPS by roughly 25%, and switching to a vanilla texture pack also helped. Here are a few examples: Maximum settings, MC enhanced (no AA), Minimum settings, Maximum settings (no AA), Vanilla texture pack, tiny render distance. Also tried Max settings with OpenGL off, MC enhanced. The recurring theme appears to be the texture pack.
O
OKNK
11-29-2016, 07:40 AM #8

I’ll experiment with adjusting certain parameters and then share the results. Lowering some options increased FPS by roughly 25%, and switching to a vanilla texture pack also helped. Here are a few examples: Maximum settings, MC enhanced (no AA), Minimum settings, Maximum settings (no AA), Vanilla texture pack, tiny render distance. Also tried Max settings with OpenGL off, MC enhanced. The recurring theme appears to be the texture pack.

N
nathanspike
Member
171
12-01-2016, 06:16 AM
#9
The issue stems from Minecraft being built on Java, which is inefficient for gaming and limits optimization. Running similar tasks in engines like CryEngine using C++ would yield significantly higher frame rates while maintaining visual quality. You can't change that—it just reflects how Minecraft was developed with real-time destruction in mind.
N
nathanspike
12-01-2016, 06:16 AM #9

The issue stems from Minecraft being built on Java, which is inefficient for gaming and limits optimization. Running similar tasks in engines like CryEngine using C++ would yield significantly higher frame rates while maintaining visual quality. You can't change that—it just reflects how Minecraft was developed with real-time destruction in mind.

S
SlowBR
Member
61
12-01-2016, 07:05 AM
#10
I want that!
S
SlowBR
12-01-2016, 07:05 AM #10

I want that!

Pages (2): 1 2 Next