F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking For FX6300 owners only!

For FX6300 owners only!

For FX6300 owners only!

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
Sneakyginger8
Senior Member
580
11-21-2016, 02:13 PM
#1
Hi, I'm checking my clock too—it's running at 4.6Ghz after boosting the Turbo and raising the CPU speed. It's currently at 225. Regarding cooling, I have an open case and a desk fan blowing air over the processor, keeping it around 38°C while idle. How about you?
S
Sneakyginger8
11-21-2016, 02:13 PM #1

Hi, I'm checking my clock too—it's running at 4.6Ghz after boosting the Turbo and raising the CPU speed. It's currently at 225. Regarding cooling, I have an open case and a desk fan blowing air over the processor, keeping it around 38°C while idle. How about you?

J
jspr03
Member
64
11-25-2016, 07:33 AM
#2
Turning off just the cores only reduces your CPU performance, it's better to keep them all active. Your clock speed considers all six cores; removing two means losing about a third of your processing power (and the additional cores won't perform any faster than when enabled). This might work for older games, but newer titles (especially after GTA 4) will gain or lose depending on whether the extra cores are on or off. Running a CPU-Z benchmark should show over 6000 points for multi-threading and around 1200 for single-threading at your current speeds.
J
jspr03
11-25-2016, 07:33 AM #2

Turning off just the cores only reduces your CPU performance, it's better to keep them all active. Your clock speed considers all six cores; removing two means losing about a third of your processing power (and the additional cores won't perform any faster than when enabled). This might work for older games, but newer titles (especially after GTA 4) will gain or lose depending on whether the extra cores are on or off. Running a CPU-Z benchmark should show over 6000 points for multi-threading and around 1200 for single-threading at your current speeds.

M
MissVoo
Member
64
11-26-2016, 07:26 PM
#3
The details would vary a lot depending on those components.
M
MissVoo
11-26-2016, 07:26 PM #3

The details would vary a lot depending on those components.

C
Clusterluck123
Junior Member
9
11-28-2016, 03:04 AM
#4
My motherboard is a 78LMT-S2 with 8GB RAM in two 4GB modules, using DDR3 1333Mhz sticks. It has a 500W power supply and an open case featuring a desktop fan blowing air over the heatsink. My cooler appears to be a TX3 Evo.
C
Clusterluck123
11-28-2016, 03:04 AM #4

My motherboard is a 78LMT-S2 with 8GB RAM in two 4GB modules, using DDR3 1333Mhz sticks. It has a 500W power supply and an open case featuring a desktop fan blowing air over the heatsink. My cooler appears to be a TX3 Evo.

B
blondeminion
Senior Member
594
11-28-2016, 03:44 AM
#5
You're doing great, just changed from 6300 to 6350 since even with a stronger processor and cooler temperatures I still couldn't maintain stability at 4.4 -4.5 GHz. It would also help to switch to 1866 MHz RAM to fully utilize the new speed.
B
blondeminion
11-28-2016, 03:44 AM #5

You're doing great, just changed from 6300 to 6350 since even with a stronger processor and cooler temperatures I still couldn't maintain stability at 4.4 -4.5 GHz. It would also help to switch to 1866 MHz RAM to fully utilize the new speed.

S
SAW1210
Junior Member
34
11-28-2016, 09:48 AM
#6
CountMike shared his progress, noting he moved from 6300 to 6350 due to stability issues at 4.4 -4.5 GHz even with stronger hardware and cooler temperatures. He suggests considering a switch to 1866 MHz RAM for better performance. He's unsure if the frequency is around 4.6Ghz or 3.9Ghz, as Windows reports 3.9Ghz, and he used the CPU frequency instead of the multiplier. He also mentioned leaving all settings on Auto and found the system much more responsive.
S
SAW1210
11-28-2016, 09:48 AM #6

CountMike shared his progress, noting he moved from 6300 to 6350 due to stability issues at 4.4 -4.5 GHz even with stronger hardware and cooler temperatures. He suggests considering a switch to 1866 MHz RAM for better performance. He's unsure if the frequency is around 4.6Ghz or 3.9Ghz, as Windows reports 3.9Ghz, and he used the CPU frequency instead of the multiplier. He also mentioned leaving all settings on Auto and found the system much more responsive.

W
Wellxam56
Member
61
11-29-2016, 09:14 AM
#7
When checking Windows system information it doesn't display OC frequency during FSB operation. Consider using CPU-Z or AMD Overdrive for better details. AOD provides useful system data. If you enabled power-saving modes and turbo in BIOS, the frequency adjustments will vary based on workload.
W
Wellxam56
11-29-2016, 09:14 AM #7

When checking Windows system information it doesn't display OC frequency during FSB operation. Consider using CPU-Z or AMD Overdrive for better details. AOD provides useful system data. If you enabled power-saving modes and turbo in BIOS, the frequency adjustments will vary based on workload.

F
floundershy
Member
191
11-29-2016, 01:31 PM
#8
I've also turned off cores 5 and 6, leaving just four active ones. On PassMark tests it drops in every run except Single Threaded, where it gains around 100 points.
Does single-threaded speed matter more for gaming than the rest?
F
floundershy
11-29-2016, 01:31 PM #8

I've also turned off cores 5 and 6, leaving just four active ones. On PassMark tests it drops in every run except Single Threaded, where it gains around 100 points.
Does single-threaded speed matter more for gaming than the rest?

J
Juliieh
Junior Member
27
12-09-2016, 08:47 AM
#9
In certain (primarily older) titles, yes; in others, it supports 4 cores or more.
J
Juliieh
12-09-2016, 08:47 AM #9

In certain (primarily older) titles, yes; in others, it supports 4 cores or more.

H
henster12345
Member
71
12-10-2016, 04:53 PM
#10
I have conducted various stress tests to demonstrate the system's stability.
H
henster12345
12-10-2016, 04:53 PM #10

I have conducted various stress tests to demonstrate the system's stability.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next