Executing Linux tasks: terminal instructions, additional commands, ongoing fixes
Executing Linux tasks: terminal instructions, additional commands, ongoing fixes
Wait... did you think I was trying to irritate you? Actually, I was just wondering why Linux operates this way. My take is that they aim for an elite, specialized OS rather than something mainstream users would prefer. Interestingly, I've been using Linux for over a year now. I don’t dislike it, but I wish it were easier to navigate. I faced quite a struggle with Debian—imagine waiting 12 hours just to install! Then another two days trying to get it running. Even after setting the right root password, which I recorded, it still wouldn’t let me install anything. Once I switched to user root, it seemed to unlock full access, unlike Linux Mint where it would let you become root instantly. I think the main issue is staying patient and listening before reacting. Surprisingly, I don’t care about the OS people use—every system is just as valid for me.
Sorry for the joke earlier, but don’t worry—I’m still here. I care about you.
Context matters when communicating; without it, your message loses clarity. For a more intuitive experience, consider an Ubuntu-based system instead of Debian.
I realize I was overwhelmed and acted on impulse, which led to negative reactions. Now I understand my behavior can make others resent me for criticizing Linux.
Not always, there are package managers involved. The main focus is on what comes by default in the repositories. Mixing Pamac with the AUR can deliver nearly any package you might need without direct terminal interaction. I don’t understand your reference to dependency hell; it hasn’t affected me personally. From the repos I use, they automatically fetch required dependencies and leave optional ones up to you, often explaining what each adds. I use Arch, and I’ve set up my installation so I rarely need to interact with the terminal. Still, I favor using the terminal most of the time, especially Yakuze’s dropdown menu for searching or installing packages and updating. It feels quicker than navigating through a GUI like Pamac. Ultimately, it comes down to how your distribution chooses to handle things and what desktop environment or packages they prefer. Today, GUIs are common, but the real choice is whether they made it easy for you.
Well, the issue is clear. The discrepancy exists because of how it was set up. Regarding the difficulties you faced, your explanation suggests the problem lies more with your understanding than with Linux itself. You were likely taught by others, so additional guidance isn’t necessary. If you had asked for assistance, you’d have gotten support on installation challenges. A useful point: Linux can work on older hardware, but only if you consider its limitations and avoid tasks it wasn’t built for. For example, using systemd on a P4 would be inappropriate.
Who handles this? Who refers to "they"? I could share many stories about bad experiences with Windows, but that shouldn’t be all you need to assess an OS’s quality. There’s nothing more natural about Linux distributions than most users, even if they’re unfamiliar with it. If you stick with A for years before trying B, it’s natural to feel out of place at first. Also, if you needed assistance installing Debian, a post about that would have been helpful. Plus, it looks like your issue is specific to Debian rather than the entire Linux world. Debian tends to focus on servers and system admins more than everyday users. Are you frustrated? Angry? You’re the one who shared a mix of weak complaints and incorrect facts. I think we all understood you and put our best in clarifying your mistakes and the reasons behind them. On the other hand, you interpreted it as a personal attack.
I understand your perspective. Right now things are quite varied. Gnome and KDE are receiving significant support from Red Hat, Canonical, Suse, Google, and Debian. The goal is to strengthen the desktop experience. Everything except Cinnamon (Linux Mint) and Mate (strong community and stability) will likely fade away soon. This actually benefits Linux; KDE, GNOME, and Cinnamon all provide solid desktop environments with distinct features. I apologize if it seemed like I was pushing a particular agenda—I intended to address how Linux works rather than criticize it. As others mentioned, feel free to ask questions. This is generally a welcoming community.