F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Eager to discover more :)

Eager to discover more :)

Eager to discover more :)

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
P
PandaPantz
Member
59
07-14-2021, 05:59 PM
#1
Hey, I’m not very familiar with my new PC yet, but I really want to understand everything. How accurate are those core speeds? And can I disable the two LEDs on the Asus GPU and turn on the mainboard’s startup to fix the appearance?
P
PandaPantz
07-14-2021, 05:59 PM #1

Hey, I’m not very familiar with my new PC yet, but I really want to understand everything. How accurate are those core speeds? And can I disable the two LEDs on the Asus GPU and turn on the mainboard’s startup to fix the appearance?

X
xAPPLExPIEx
Senior Member
657
07-14-2021, 06:33 PM
#2
Your setup runs at an auto-overclocked level, probably due to MCE technology. This can be a trick used by some motherboard makers. It’s correct information, though it implies you’re handling roughly twice the maximum power for your CPU.
X
xAPPLExPIEx
07-14-2021, 06:33 PM #2

Your setup runs at an auto-overclocked level, probably due to MCE technology. This can be a trick used by some motherboard makers. It’s correct information, though it implies you’re handling roughly twice the maximum power for your CPU.

D
DYLARK01
Member
199
07-24-2021, 03:28 PM
#3
Core speed stands at 5.0988 GHz and appears accurate. Which LEDs are you asking about? Feel free to share the photo if needed.
D
DYLARK01
07-24-2021, 03:28 PM #3

Core speed stands at 5.0988 GHz and appears accurate. Which LEDs are you asking about? Feel free to share the photo if needed.

G
gaLact1cfLea
Member
194
07-29-2021, 07:43 PM
#4
The speed mentioned is accurate, but it shouldn't reach 5.1 GHz unless you've overclocked it yourself... Are you? If not, your BIOS might be handling things incorrectly, and I’d recommend updating it. A 9900k processor shouldn’t exceed 5 GHz by default, and I suspect it’s drawing excessive voltage if it is running at that frequency. Edited May 29, 2020 by SansVarnic
G
gaLact1cfLea
07-29-2021, 07:43 PM #4

The speed mentioned is accurate, but it shouldn't reach 5.1 GHz unless you've overclocked it yourself... Are you? If not, your BIOS might be handling things incorrectly, and I’d recommend updating it. A 9900k processor shouldn’t exceed 5 GHz by default, and I suspect it’s drawing excessive voltage if it is running at that frequency. Edited May 29, 2020 by SansVarnic

2
25daniel
Member
177
07-29-2021, 08:03 PM
#5
2
25daniel
07-29-2021, 08:03 PM #5

J
james26665
Senior Member
537
07-31-2021, 06:31 AM
#6
It seems this setup doesn't work as intended. Both parameters should cause instability. Reminder: damaging LEDs with force can shorten their lifespan.
J
james26665
07-31-2021, 06:31 AM #6

It seems this setup doesn't work as intended. Both parameters should cause instability. Reminder: damaging LEDs with force can shorten their lifespan.

R
RockRippa
Junior Member
44
08-09-2021, 10:04 PM
#7
If it doesn't affect the CPU, I don't know much about power usage 😊
R
RockRippa
08-09-2021, 10:04 PM #7

If it doesn't affect the CPU, I don't know much about power usage 😊

I
ItzKanekii
Junior Member
34
08-10-2021, 02:49 AM
#8
Run is powered by XMP1, with AI overclocking support from Asus.
I
ItzKanekii
08-10-2021, 02:49 AM #8

Run is powered by XMP1, with AI overclocking support from Asus.

M
MasterJeffho
Junior Member
2
08-10-2021, 02:59 AM
#9
CPU-Z indicates "x51.0 (8-50)" meaning the 5.1Ghz is below the maximum boost for all cores. My 9900K is configured to boost up to 5.2Ghz on up to four cores, which aligns with this result.
M
MasterJeffho
08-10-2021, 02:59 AM #9

CPU-Z indicates "x51.0 (8-50)" meaning the 5.1Ghz is below the maximum boost for all cores. My 9900K is configured to boost up to 5.2Ghz on up to four cores, which aligns with this result.

I
ItsMeAimee
Junior Member
10
08-10-2021, 10:03 AM
#10
AI Overclocking is essentially a DIY approach, typically handled by Asus. I wouldn't recommend it. It's highly probable that it's applying excessive voltage. Achieving 5.1 GHz on a 9900k chip today is challenging, as those processors were limited in optimization. My 9900k could handle it, but maintaining the necessary cooling would be risky, even with an aggressive custom setup. The main concern is the voltage it generates—far beyond what's stable and safe. I wouldn't rely on this method; for overclocking, manual adjustments are safer.
I
ItsMeAimee
08-10-2021, 10:03 AM #10

AI Overclocking is essentially a DIY approach, typically handled by Asus. I wouldn't recommend it. It's highly probable that it's applying excessive voltage. Achieving 5.1 GHz on a 9900k chip today is challenging, as those processors were limited in optimization. My 9900k could handle it, but maintaining the necessary cooling would be risky, even with an aggressive custom setup. The main concern is the voltage it generates—far beyond what's stable and safe. I wouldn't rely on this method; for overclocking, manual adjustments are safer.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next