F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Delete the specified content.

Delete the specified content.

Delete the specified content.

E
Expandablexx
Junior Member
47
10-18-2016, 05:00 AM
#1
Delete the specified content.
E
Expandablexx
10-18-2016, 05:00 AM #1

Delete the specified content.

L
lexunam
Junior Member
10
10-18-2016, 05:15 AM
#2
You can't achieve 7.7GHz memory...that's not possible. What you're receiving is a real clock of 1200MHz and an effective clock of 2400MHz. That's the capability of your hardware.
L
lexunam
10-18-2016, 05:15 AM #2

You can't achieve 7.7GHz memory...that's not possible. What you're receiving is a real clock of 1200MHz and an effective clock of 2400MHz. That's the capability of your hardware.

B
BareBlessed
Junior Member
46
10-18-2016, 07:38 AM
#3
Consider why 7732Mhz is recommended and how DDR memory speeds are determined. Generally, if tools like Task Manager or CPU-Z report a higher frequency, you should multiply it to match the advertised speeds by your motherboard or RAM maker.
B
BareBlessed
10-18-2016, 07:38 AM #3

Consider why 7732Mhz is recommended and how DDR memory speeds are determined. Generally, if tools like Task Manager or CPU-Z report a higher frequency, you should multiply it to match the advertised speeds by your motherboard or RAM maker.

K
krisjul
Member
139
10-18-2016, 01:47 PM
#4
they explained that the arrangement matters. putting 2x8GB in slot one and then 16GB in slot three is better than starting with 8GB, 16GB, and then 8GB. the order affects performance, not just capacity.
K
krisjul
10-18-2016, 01:47 PM #4

they explained that the arrangement matters. putting 2x8GB in slot one and then 16GB in slot three is better than starting with 8GB, 16GB, and then 8GB. the order affects performance, not just capacity.

S
sadfenris
Junior Member
34
10-19-2016, 08:04 PM
#5
S
sadfenris
10-19-2016, 08:04 PM #5

D
duhazneubin
Senior Member
583
10-19-2016, 08:23 PM
#6
Second and fourth RAM slots? More efficient?
D
duhazneubin
10-19-2016, 08:23 PM #6

Second and fourth RAM slots? More efficient?

A
ArthoFake
Member
142
10-20-2016, 01:14 AM
#7
The issue lies in the RAM setup, you can't combine 2x8 and a single 16GB module. The recommended configuration should be 4x8 or 2x16.
A
ArthoFake
10-20-2016, 01:14 AM #7

The issue lies in the RAM setup, you can't combine 2x8 and a single 16GB module. The recommended configuration should be 4x8 or 2x16.