F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Custom-built network switch tailored to specific requirements.

Custom-built network switch tailored to specific requirements.

Custom-built network switch tailored to specific requirements.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
P
PolarGod
Junior Member
13
03-04-2016, 11:52 PM
#1
Hello, I'm working on a completely custom network switch. Instead of traditional RJ45 ports, it uses USB-C ports for easy setup. The goal is to create a portable LAN hub ideal for high-speed gaming or file transfers anywhere. I'm considering adding a built-in battery and an external power source so devices can be charged via the port. Keeping everything simple is my priority—no RGMII or complicated features. Would love your feedback before diving deeper, especially with Altium design tools.
P
PolarGod
03-04-2016, 11:52 PM #1

Hello, I'm working on a completely custom network switch. Instead of traditional RJ45 ports, it uses USB-C ports for easy setup. The goal is to create a portable LAN hub ideal for high-speed gaming or file transfers anywhere. I'm considering adding a built-in battery and an external power source so devices can be charged via the port. Keeping everything simple is my priority—no RGMII or complicated features. Would love your feedback before diving deeper, especially with Altium design tools.

X
XpGames4u
Junior Member
3
03-05-2016, 03:28 AM
#2
You'd likely choose a switch chip designed for Ethernet rather than USB. Converting USB to Ethernet might work, but it doesn't make much sense compared to using Wi-Fi, which seems more fitting for your needs.
X
XpGames4u
03-05-2016, 03:28 AM #2

You'd likely choose a switch chip designed for Ethernet rather than USB. Converting USB to Ethernet might work, but it doesn't make much sense compared to using Wi-Fi, which seems more fitting for your needs.

J
JuanchoTarca1
Member
74
03-05-2016, 04:59 AM
#3
It looks like you're questioning whether this setup offers any real advantage over simpler options like a Ubiquiti Flex-Mini and a USB battery bank. You're wondering if adding an Ethernet switch IC and USB-to-Ethernet chips would be inefficient, especially since many gaming PCs already include built-in Ethernet controllers.
J
JuanchoTarca1
03-05-2016, 04:59 AM #3

It looks like you're questioning whether this setup offers any real advantage over simpler options like a Ubiquiti Flex-Mini and a USB battery bank. You're wondering if adding an Ethernet switch IC and USB-to-Ethernet chips would be inefficient, especially since many gaming PCs already include built-in Ethernet controllers.

X
xSneik
Member
178
03-09-2016, 09:22 PM
#4
Sure, on fairly recent systems you could leverage 2.5Gb Ethernet (common on current boards) for fast data moves.
X
xSneik
03-09-2016, 09:22 PM #4

Sure, on fairly recent systems you could leverage 2.5Gb Ethernet (common on current boards) for fast data moves.

Y
ybemy
Member
227
03-17-2016, 11:56 AM
#5
Beyond that, USB-C cables have very short ranges, making it tough to connect multiple devices compared to Ethernet.
Y
ybemy
03-17-2016, 11:56 AM #5

Beyond that, USB-C cables have very short ranges, making it tough to connect multiple devices compared to Ethernet.

M
MrSubway1999
Member
111
03-17-2016, 07:49 PM
#6
I could use the BCM5387 from Broadcom and the RTL8156 from Realtek. I'm still organizing the layout, aiming to fit as much as possible into limited space. Without a battery, I'd need to rely on PoE+ for RJ45 or use a USB port to supply power. Edited January 11, 2022 by SientyHD
M
MrSubway1999
03-17-2016, 07:49 PM #6

I could use the BCM5387 from Broadcom and the RTL8156 from Realtek. I'm still organizing the layout, aiming to fit as much as possible into limited space. Without a battery, I'd need to rely on PoE+ for RJ45 or use a USB port to supply power. Edited January 11, 2022 by SientyHD

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
03-17-2016, 09:22 PM
#7
You're asking about the choice of USB controllers and switch chips. It seems you're considering alternatives like the RTL8111 for better performance.
C
carp3
03-17-2016, 09:22 PM #7

You're asking about the choice of USB controllers and switch chips. It seems you're considering alternatives like the RTL8111 for better performance.

I
itsTiqs
Member
54
03-19-2016, 09:18 PM
#8
The RTL8153 is a PCIe device, not USB. You're aiming to create a plug-and-play solution that accommodates various peripherals.
I
itsTiqs
03-19-2016, 09:18 PM #8

The RTL8153 is a PCIe device, not USB. You're aiming to create a plug-and-play solution that accommodates various peripherals.

N
Nairbnil
Junior Member
32
03-22-2016, 07:09 AM
#9
I realized there was a standard part number for RTL chips and it came to mind.
N
Nairbnil
03-22-2016, 07:09 AM #9

I realized there was a standard part number for RTL chips and it came to mind.

T
TurritaSC
Member
156
03-27-2016, 07:28 AM
#10
It seems the USB connection adds extra functionality beyond just Ethernet. While a standard Gigabit switch provides network access, USB offers direct device integration, power delivery, and sometimes file transfer capabilities that aren’t available through Ethernet alone.
T
TurritaSC
03-27-2016, 07:28 AM #10

It seems the USB connection adds extra functionality beyond just Ethernet. While a standard Gigabit switch provides network access, USB offers direct device integration, power delivery, and sometimes file transfer capabilities that aren’t available through Ethernet alone.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next