Consider upgrading to the latest version for improved features and security.
Consider upgrading to the latest version for improved features and security.
RDNA offers a solid design, while RDNA2 aims to enhance it further.
AMD clearly invests heavily in RDNA2 development, yet my experience with their graphics has been mixed. The video encoder on the green side stands out as a strong point, and the AI cores in the latest models are impressive.
I switched from an "8 core" FX CPU a year ago, and the improvement is significant. I often wish I had chosen the Intel Core i7 2600K instead. Upgrading made a big difference—my performance jumped from 22 FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey to over 100 FPS, though it also depends on my GPU.
Absolutely, I've used two different AMD GPUs. The first one failed completely, and I haven't managed to figure out why yet—it's just sitting in the closet. I won't blame them for that. However, I contacted AMD again this time because performance matters, and they've always been strong.
amd consistently managed the budget end of the stick, honestly. i’ve got a gsync monitor and don’t think rdna 2 will be especially strong, but i’m hoping it’ll push nvidia to improve its performance on a ti model.