Can't push my CPU any further anymore??? (I used to be able to)
Can't push my CPU any further anymore??? (I used to be able to)
I had no idea how I resolved it... it just occurred without me trying since my BIOS doesn't support manual overclocking. I checked Core Temp and the temperature was around 63c to 65c during full load. (My highest throttling temperature with my FX CPU is 70c*)
Rogue Leader:
Sam_ramos_02 :
It seems confusing, but it used to function even when I wasn’t heavily overclocking and it suddenly worked :/
Your message doesn’t make much sense.
The highest temperature your CPU reached before throttling is 65°C measured with AMD overdrive, which is the proper method for checking temperatures on an FX CPU. If you kept running at that level constantly, whether or not you overclocked, you’d likely damage it.
It’s clear your Overclock isn’t working anymore, and the signs match exactly what I mentioned earlier.
I don’t think you grasp the problem...
If your bios doesn’t support manual overclocking, what steps are you taking to achieve it? What motherboard are you using? Also, the core temperature readings aren’t accurate—it seems the right software isn’t suitable for monitoring an FX. You should verify your thermal limits in Overdrive. Your CPU throttles at 65 and 70.5, with a maximum of 70°C before shutting down. If you continue to dismiss my concerns by claiming I don’t understand the problem, you’ll likely ask this elsewhere. I’ve spent most of my career working with AMD CPUs and know them well. You’re not giving enough details to properly diagnose or fix the issue.
Haha, why are you getting insulted for saying you don't get it? I was using AMD overdrive and it helped me overclock. The core temp stayed the same as before, just like when I used AMD overdrive. I double-checked both temperatures—never went above 65°C, because at 66 they'd make the fans really loud. Also, my PC is a prebuilt one (motherboard: ASUS M51BC).
TjMax for all FX CPUs reaches 62°C. Running it at 65°C would essentially damage the CPU for the duration it operates.
Core Temp is designed for Intel processors and may not be accurate for FX CPUs.
Sam_ramos_02 was asking about why someone was upset because he mentioned not understanding something. He explained that using AMD overdrive allowed him to overclock, and the temperatures stayed consistent—never exceeding 65°C, which would have been noticeable with louder fans. He also noted his prebuilt PC had an ASUS M51BC motherboard. He clarified that Overdrive only sets a thermal limit, meaning higher numbers are cooler while lower ones are hotter. He pointed out the thermal limit is based on the CPU's maximum temperature. He mentioned the motherboard has cooling fins and might be a 6+2 setup, but changing coolers could affect airflow. He suggested the issue might be CPU damage or VRM failure, possibly due to overheating, and that repeated failures could indicate this problem.
Karadjgne shared the max temperature for all FX CPUs at 62°C. Running it at 65°C would essentially destroy the CPU for the duration of operation. Core Temp was designed for Intel chips and may not be accurate for FX CPUs. Rogue Leader responded with additional details, clarifying that the Core Temp reading matched what was seen on AMD overdrive, staying below 65°C due to fan noise at that level. He also mentioned his system uses a prebuilt motherboard (ASUS M51BC) and noted that Overdrive is meant for testing purposes, not for regular overclocking. He pointed out the VRMs have cooling fins and suggests it might be a 6+2 setup, though changing coolers could affect airflow. He expressed concern about possible CPU damage or VRM failure, suggesting the issue might be temporary but could lead to long-term failure if repeated. He advised considering a different CPU model like Ryzen or Intel i5 if the current FX is causing bottlenecks.
Sam_ramos_02 :
So should I leave my cpu as it is, with no overclocking or what should I do about it.
(thinking of buying a ryzen or intel i5 because my fx is bottlenecking my 1050 a bit *70-80% gpu usage)
At this point if it works without Overclocking then live with it, but you're on borrowed time before that motherboard fails for good. There is not way to fix it.
I love my Ryzen 7, and the Ryzen 5's are great deals for the cores and performance you get. You will need the CPU, Motherboard, and DDR4 memory. That should be your next step.
Have you ever witnessed an hdd fail? It begins with just a tiny part of one sector. Gradually, most of that sector deteriorates. Then more sectors, then half a dozen, then twenty, and so on. Your cpu/mobo is no different; the chain has already begun and advanced enough that you can't surpass the original limits. Eventually, it will reach a stage where it can no longer cope, forcing you to underclock. It might take a month, six months, or even tomorrow.
If you've considered upgrading and rebuilding, I suggest giving that thought much more serious attention—this is definitely a time-sensitive decision.
Rogue Leader:
Sam_ramos_02 :
Should I keep the CPU as it is, without any overclocking, or should I consider upgrading to something like a Ryzen or Intel i5? My GPU is already straining the system with around 70-80% usage. If it runs smoothly without overclocking, I can live with that, but the motherboard might fail soon. There’s no real solution.
I really like my Ryzen 7, and the Ryzen 5 offers good value for performance. You’ll need the CPU, motherboard, and DDR4 RAM next.
https://ibb.co/imjHtG