F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Are you certain about defragmenting now? (Answer confirmed)

Are you certain about defragmenting now? (Answer confirmed)

Are you certain about defragmenting now? (Answer confirmed)

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
R
RulwenJr
Posting Freak
786
09-11-2016, 07:51 PM
#11
When using Windows 7 or newer, the system handles defragmentation automatically in the background, provided the disk defragmenter isn’t disabled or replaced. If your hard drive seems to be malfunctioning, consider using HD Sentinel or the HDTune Pros trial (I suggest the latter). Regularly run Chkdsk scans to check for issues. SSDs don’t benefit from defragmentation; they distribute data across the drive, which can shorten their lifespan if you do it.
R
RulwenJr
09-11-2016, 07:51 PM #11

When using Windows 7 or newer, the system handles defragmentation automatically in the background, provided the disk defragmenter isn’t disabled or replaced. If your hard drive seems to be malfunctioning, consider using HD Sentinel or the HDTune Pros trial (I suggest the latter). Regularly run Chkdsk scans to check for issues. SSDs don’t benefit from defragmentation; they distribute data across the drive, which can shorten their lifespan if you do it.

S
SlaRac0nte_
Member
217
09-11-2016, 09:14 PM
#12
I gotta contradict you there. With hard drives the rule is always "Don't fix what isn't broken" If a SMART monitoring tool such as Crystal Disk finds damaged sectors, THEN run chkdsk. If you run it when nothing is wrong, you are just wasting time and wearing the drive. (At least in my experience) I have seen chkdsk kill a drive that was on the edge so don't run it for nothing. Here is an analogy(you can decide how valid it is) You have a classic old reliable car(old toyota for example) and you want to make absolutely sure it doesn't "surprise" you with something breaking or falling off. So every month, you take off every bolt and re-tighten it to make absolutely sure that every bolt is always tight. At a glance this seems smart because you can be sure that no bolts will fall out randomly. However, all you are really doing is wearing down the threads and wasting your own time. It is completely unnecessary to constantly tighten those bolts unless you have good reason to believe something is loose. However, if you do think something is loose, you should absolutely make sure by tightening it. but otherwise, you are just fixing what isn't broken. I would say hard drives should be treated in the same way. Don't try and fix it if it isn't broken. But also don't neglect it if there is something needing to be fixed.
S
SlaRac0nte_
09-11-2016, 09:14 PM #12

I gotta contradict you there. With hard drives the rule is always "Don't fix what isn't broken" If a SMART monitoring tool such as Crystal Disk finds damaged sectors, THEN run chkdsk. If you run it when nothing is wrong, you are just wasting time and wearing the drive. (At least in my experience) I have seen chkdsk kill a drive that was on the edge so don't run it for nothing. Here is an analogy(you can decide how valid it is) You have a classic old reliable car(old toyota for example) and you want to make absolutely sure it doesn't "surprise" you with something breaking or falling off. So every month, you take off every bolt and re-tighten it to make absolutely sure that every bolt is always tight. At a glance this seems smart because you can be sure that no bolts will fall out randomly. However, all you are really doing is wearing down the threads and wasting your own time. It is completely unnecessary to constantly tighten those bolts unless you have good reason to believe something is loose. However, if you do think something is loose, you should absolutely make sure by tightening it. but otherwise, you are just fixing what isn't broken. I would say hard drives should be treated in the same way. Don't try and fix it if it isn't broken. But also don't neglect it if there is something needing to be fixed.

S
Shyrell
Member
130
09-12-2016, 04:47 PM
#13
I understand your point, but if he has data on the drive that won’t get corrupted, it’s worth considering. You’re right. My apology for missing that.
S
Shyrell
09-12-2016, 04:47 PM #13

I understand your point, but if he has data on the drive that won’t get corrupted, it’s worth considering. You’re right. My apology for missing that.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2