All the feedback is overwhelming. I can't believe it.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next

Murica1776
Member

208

06-11-2017, 01:43 AM

This $120 chip is impressive. It performs similarly to a Dodge Neon SRT-4 or modern CPUs. In short, it matches the 7700k, outperforms the 9100f and mostly the 9400f, and edges out the 1600AF.

Murica1776

06-11-2017, 01:43 AM #1

This $120 chip is impressive. It performs similarly to a Dodge Neon SRT-4 or modern CPUs. In short, it matches the 7700k, outperforms the 9100f and mostly the 9400f, and edges out the 1600AF.

_Kibbu_
Member

07-02-2017, 09:35 AM

Great find! A midrange AMD chip without a dedicated GPU is a nice option.

_Kibbu_

07-02-2017, 09:35 AM #2

Great find! A midrange AMD chip without a dedicated GPU is a nice option.

cookiedough909
Posting Freak

782

07-02-2017, 12:48 PM

I could leave my 1600AE behind for this opportunity.

cookiedough909

07-02-2017, 12:48 PM #3

I could leave my 1600AE behind for this opportunity.

Redconfuser
Junior Member

07-04-2017, 06:01 AM

I don't like quad-core processors, but this one offers excellent value for its price.

Redconfuser

07-04-2017, 06:01 AM #4

I don't like quad-core processors, but this one offers excellent value for its price.

snoffy
Member

119

07-11-2017, 12:28 PM

The Ryzen 3300X really caught my attention. It’s impressive how tough it is to suggest alternatives like the i5-9400 or 9400F these days. How does it compare to the i5-9600 (non-K/KF)?

snoffy

07-11-2017, 12:28 PM #5

The Ryzen 3300X really caught my attention. It’s impressive how tough it is to suggest alternatives like the i5-9400 or 9400F these days. How does it compare to the i5-9600 (non-K/KF)?

imacat1
Junior Member

07-11-2017, 05:09 PM

It seems ideal for gamers. According to the benchmarks, it outperforms others in workstation tasks—perfect for content makers—but matches game performance closely. For those on a tighter budget, it's a solid choice.

imacat1

07-11-2017, 05:09 PM #6

DDotty2
Member

223

07-11-2017, 06:29 PM

It also highlights that 4/8 remains a functional gaming chip, meaning users with 7700K systems shouldn’t rush upgrading solely for additional cores.

DDotty2

07-11-2017, 06:29 PM #7

It also highlights that 4/8 remains a functional gaming chip, meaning users with 7700K systems shouldn’t rush upgrading solely for additional cores.

Marfel04
Junior Member

07-11-2017, 07:10 PM

a suitable replacement for the 1200/1300x/1400/1500x setup is definitely worthwhile.

Marfel04

07-11-2017, 07:10 PM #8

a suitable replacement for the 1200/1300x/1400/1500x setup is definitely worthwhile.

ahanlon26
Junior Member

07-13-2017, 11:57 PM

Certainly. In content creation scenarios, the 3300x with its four core/threads and higher clock speeds might be more advantageous than the 1600 AF with six cores and lower clock speeds.

ahanlon26

07-13-2017, 11:57 PM #9

Certainly. In content creation scenarios, the 3300x with its four core/threads and higher clock speeds might be more advantageous than the 1600 AF with six cores and lower clock speeds.

Anson1108
Member

102

07-17-2017, 07:24 PM

#10

Gaming continues to rise, just like the 1600AF

Anson1108

07-17-2017, 07:24 PM #10

Gaming continues to rise, just like the 1600AF

Pages (2): 1 2 Next